Never Lose Faith!!
Keep FR Strong
By Becoming A Monthly Donor!!
Sponsoring FReepers are contributing
$10 Each time a New Monthly Donor signs up!
Get more bang for your FR buck!
Click Here To Sign Up Now!
Posted on 11/01/2011 1:17:42 PM PDT by IbJensen
Appearing the other night on the Catholic network EWTN, I was asked by Raymond Arroyo what should be done about Muslim students at Catholic University demanding that the school provide them with prayer rooms, from which crucifixes and all other Catholic symbols that they found offensive had been removed.
After a nanosecond I replied, "Kick 'em out!"
Let them go to George Washington, the university on the other side of town.
Indeed, had Muslim students shown so little loyalty to a school that welcomed them, and of whose Catholicism they were aware when they entered, expulsion would have been justified.
Looking further into the matter, that was a rush to judgment.
For it seems that not a single Muslim student at CUA had gone to the District of Columbia Office of Human Rights to file a complaint.
That complaint was the work of John Banzhaf, a professor at GW, perennial litigant, and longtime contender for the title of National Pest.
In provocative language, Banzhaf told Fox News, "It shouldn't be too difficult to set aside a small room where Muslims can pray without having to stare up and be looked down upon by a cross of Jesus.
"They do have to pray five times a day, and to be sitting there trying to do Muslim prayers with a big cross looking down or a picture or Jesus or a picture of the pope is not very conducive to their religion."
Banzhaf claimed Muslim students had been offended by a suggestion that they meditate in campus chapels "and at the cathedral that looms over the entire campus -- the Basilica of the National Shrine of the Immaculate Conception."
Yet it is Banzhaf who appears to be the one with a real problem with Jesus, the shrine and Catholicism, not the Muslim students whose numbers at CUA have doubled in five years.
Moreover, Muslims, while disbelieving that Jesus is the Son of God, regard him as the greatest of the prophets before Muhammad, and they revere Mary, the mother of Jesus.
Banzhaf has also filed a complaint with the Office of Human Rights that Catholic University discriminates against women.
How so? CUA President John Garvey had decided to put men and women students into separate dormitories, a crime against humanity.
The Office of Human rights has said that its investigation of Banzhaf's complaints will require six months.
What does this episode tell us?
That there are anti-Catholic bigots whose stock-in-trade is exploiting civil rights laws to smear the church and her institutions, and drive wedges between Catholics and other faiths.
Second, if the Office of Human Rights has nothing better to do than spending six months investigating these nonsensical charges, it ought to be abolished. Give the taxpayers back the money these bureaucrats are wasting, and let them go and, as Ronald Reagan used to say, "test the magic of the marketplace."
Catholic University, after all, is a private religious institution that, under the First Amendment, is as free to pick its students and set its rules as is Bob Jones University in South Carolina or Yeshiva in New York or Brigham Young in Utah.
The episode also reveals how the cause of civil rights has been trivialized and exploited.
The 1964 Civil Rights Act outlawed segregation by restaurants and corporations. The 1965 Voting Rights Act struck down state impediments to black access to the ballot. The 1968 act forbade discrimination in the purchase and sale of housing.
While these laws restricted the freedom of state officials, restaurateurs, bar owners, hotel operators and homeowners, that was the price we as a people agreed to pay to end segregation. But civil rights and human rights laws are today being used to compel Christian institutions to conform to anti-Christian agendas that violate their basic principles.
In the district, a new law ordering all city contractors to recognize gay marriages impelled the archdiocese to terminate its 80-year foster-care program, rather than let children be adopted by homosexuals. And the people of Washington were denied a vote on homosexual marriage by a District of Columbia judge who ruled that permitting a referendum on gay marriage would violate the district's Human Rights Act.
Nationally, the church is resisting an Obamacare mandate that forces Catholic hospitals to provide patients with abortifacients such as the FDA-approved Ella and Plan B, the morning-after pill.
Dr. Ron Crews, executive director of the 2,000-member Chaplain Alliance for Religious Liberty, has denounced a Pentagon decision to permit military chapels to be used for homosexual marriages, a violation, says Crews, of the federal Defense of Marriage Act.
"By dishonestly sanctioning the use of federal facilities for 'counterfeit marriages,' that federal law and the vast majority of Americans have rejected, the Pentagon has launched a direct assault on the fundamental unit of society -- husband and wife."
Culture wars, rooted in irreconcilable conflicts about God and man, right and wrong, are disintegrating the moral community we once were -- and will likely never be again.
Something wicked this way comes, and that would be full-blown State persecution. We must take solace in the knowledge that the blood of martyrs nourishes the Church (and she's in desperate need of nourishing). As Pope Pius XII magnificently expressed it, the Church is "empurpled by the sacred blood of martyrs".
Catholic University, it seems to me, should have the same right as the Supreme Court of the US — that is: to refuse to consider cases brought about by people who have “no standing”. It seems to me that a prof at a competing University has NO STANDING! End of story.
Catholic Ping
Please freepmail me if you want on/off this list
I agree-Christianity is increasingly under attack not only in sterile academia— but in the Courts as well.We were taught in Pastoral Ministries 101 back in the 80’s that if a division is noted the best time to resolve it is as soon as possible.
Problem is this division began about 1940 when the supreme Court declared in Cantwell v. Conn. they could use a misconstruction of the 14th Amendment to apply to the States what from 1791 until 1940 had always applied only to the Federal govt. Ten years before my birth this began. In the sixties the minor division became a major breach/slippery slope. And with all the metaphysical refinements and tests of logical skill practiced by a Court cut free of its mooring (in 72 it was the Lemon test—in 84 it was the endorsement test ) Had we the people not been distracted—or asleep we may be in better position than we seem to be.
But such seems par for the course for Americans— we prefer to recline until it affects us personal then we raise up and whup A.
I believe that in this situation much depends on whether CUA receives any federal funding. If they do, then they essentially have to give up most rights to act in accordance with the Catholic faith, and must instead obey federal nondiscrimination laws. That’s one reason Hillsdale doesn’t even accept federal student loans in payment for tuition and fees—that gives them independence to act as they like, as a private institution.
“It seems to me that a prof at a competing University has NO STANDING! End of story.”
I agree. Unfortunately, if they are recieving any federal funding, they have made a deal with the devil and I figure the government could force them to capitulate.
Is this just happenstance, or is someone or some organization funding their tuition?
This is great if they are receiving a truly universal education, but not so good if they are just learning how to be better sleeper agents.
Our judges are drunk on power, and you are right, it came with Cantwell.
This guy wanted a twofer. Catholics to hate Muslims and Muslims to hate Catholics. Arroyo should have checked this out before asking a question.
When the occupant of the White House won’t see a Catholic or a Christian, we know we are in big trouble.
Pray for a big sweep in 2012!
ping
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.