Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Michele Bachmann brushes off Newsweek cover (But Editor Tina Brown says picture is appropriate)
Hotair ^ | 08/09/2011 | Tina Korbe

Posted on 08/09/2011 11:01:36 AM PDT by SeekAndFind

The president of the National Organization of Women actually rose to Rep. Michele Bachmann’s defense yesterday (didn’t see that coming!), while Newsweek editor Tina Brown tried to justify the “Crazy Eyes” cover that inspired so much conservative commentary yesterday. But one person seem disinclined to talk about the cover one way or another and that was Bachmann herself. As of yesterday afternoon, Bachmann still hadn’t seen the picture and she didn’t seem to care too much to talk about it when she could be talking about her campaign and her ideas for the country:

Brown claims the cover is OK because “Bachmann’s intensity is galvanizing voters in Iowa right now and Newsweek’s cover captures that.” But, of course, “rage” carries rather different connotations than “intensity.”

Still, Brown certainly has the “galvanizing voters” part right. According to a Monday Rasmussen Reports poll, Bachmann still leads Iowa (over Romney). Plus, Iowa talk radio host Steve Deace predicts Bachmann will easily win the Ames straw poll this Saturday. “If she stands her ground [in the debate this week] then the mystery isn’t whether or not she’ll win, but by how much,” Deace has said.

The entire episode illustrates just how beautifully Bachmann’s campaign has grown up. After the Great Migraine Scandal of Summer 2011, Bachmann’s campaign seemed the slightest bit testy, somewhat defensive (remember the rumors that one of her staffers “roughed up” a reporter who dared to ask about her headaches?). Bachmann came out on top eventually, with a thoughtfully worded statement and the brilliant release of a note from her doctor — but, in this instance, it took Bachmann just one afternoon and a few cheerful words to teach Newsweek its relative irrelevance.

CLICK ABOVE LINK FOR THE VIDEO



TOPICS: Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2008electionbias; 2012electionbias; bachmannbashing; dnctalkingpoints; enemedia; goebbelswouldbeproud; mediawar; michelebachmann; misogynism; newsweak; newsweek; pravdamedia; tinabrown; yellowjournalism; zogbyism
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-42 next last
To: trumandogz

Every photo that appears on a magazine cover is touched up. It will be cropped, the contrast adjusted, the focus sharpened or diffused depending on the look the editors want, etc. Photoshop or some other more purpose specific software was used on this one too. The question is whether or not the expression was intentionally altered to defame the candidate.


21 posted on 08/09/2011 11:22:49 AM PDT by SoCal Pubbie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

She doesn’t look the slightest bit enraged to me.

Their cover featuring Sarah Palin in her Wonderbra was much better though.


22 posted on 08/09/2011 11:25:29 AM PDT by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
Tina also thought this was appropriate:
23 posted on 08/09/2011 11:25:48 AM PDT by hecht (TAKE BACK OUR NATION AND OUR NATIONAL ANTHEM)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

I really don’t see what is wrong with this picture. Looks OK to me. Looking at the camera might be better than looking over the camera, but she looks fine in any case.


24 posted on 08/09/2011 11:28:46 AM PDT by Kirkwood (Zombie Hunter Hobbit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Buckeye McFrog
RE: Their cover featuring Sarah Palin in her Wonderbra was much better though.

You mean this??

25 posted on 08/09/2011 11:30:34 AM PDT by SeekAndFind (u)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Anyone with a brain can see they doctored the pic like they did Palin’s. I heard that NOW spoke up against this.

FUMSM!


26 posted on 08/09/2011 11:44:53 AM PDT by Dubya-M-DeesWent2SyriaStupid! (S&P wasn't worried about us not lifting the debt ceiling - they are worried about the spending)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

They tried to make her look like the “Runaway Bride” in my opinion. MSM are a bunch of ghoul bastards and hell bitches in my opinion. Anyone who believes their bullshit more than once is an idiot.


27 posted on 08/09/2011 11:49:42 AM PDT by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

I bet Sarah had insisted on a legally binding approval of final print-ready covers.......INSIST ON IT PEOPLE!


28 posted on 08/09/2011 11:51:21 AM PDT by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

I don’t see what the problem is with the photo, but then again I think she always looks awesome.


29 posted on 08/09/2011 11:52:32 AM PDT by Kleon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

I swear - Newsweek is becoming a left-wing version of MAD magazine.


30 posted on 08/09/2011 11:52:32 AM PDT by Zhang Fei (Let us pray that peace be now restored to the world and that God will preserve it always.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

They can not run on Obama accomplishment so the politics of destruction isi all they have. whoever the nominee is , this is just the beginning.


31 posted on 08/09/2011 11:53:08 AM PDT by lexington minuteman 1775
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Newsweek is still in business?

Who knew!


32 posted on 08/09/2011 12:06:30 PM PDT by Uncle Miltie (Gore Lauds Romney on Climate Position; 0bamaCare was based on RomneyCare.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

33 posted on 08/09/2011 12:07:39 PM PDT by Uncle Miltie (Gore Lauds Romney on Climate Position; 0bamaCare was based on RomneyCare.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: arkady_renko

Speaking of crazies! She certainly doesn’t need that association.


34 posted on 08/09/2011 12:09:29 PM PDT by Wallop the Cat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
That doesn’t look so bad; they could have subtitled it “Two Good Reasons for Sarah Palin…”
35 posted on 08/09/2011 12:14:28 PM PDT by cartan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: mad_as_he$$

Guy needs a life

Needs a boot in his ass....

.


36 posted on 08/09/2011 12:17:36 PM PDT by flatfish
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: trumandogz

“If I follow them around with a high speed camera long enough, I’ll come up with whatever instantaneous facial expression I need

Many cell phones have video capability. 20 seconds could provide any number of weird images.


37 posted on 08/09/2011 12:41:54 PM PDT by chainsaw (I'd hate to be a democrat running against Sarah Palin.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

Comment #38 Removed by Moderator

To: Yehuda
Here's the un-retouched head shot of the Newsweek editor.

Tina Brown

39 posted on 08/09/2011 3:58:15 PM PDT by freedom_forge (http://libertyphysics.wordpress.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
Atlantic's photographer pulled this same partisan propaganda crap with McCain in 2008.

Lib Photographer Admits Making McCain Look Sinister for Mag Cover (newsbusters.org ^ | September 13, 2008 | Noel Sheppard)

She quickly posted her own additional manipulated photos of McCain to her website and vented her hatred of the GOP candidate.

The Atlantic should have Googled Jill Greenberg before hiring her (Michelle Malkin.com ^ | September 15, 2008 | Michelle Malkin)

40 posted on 08/09/2011 6:13:44 PM PDT by a fool in paradise (The liberal press applauded when the NY Times hacked Newt Gingrich's phone calls.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-42 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson