Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Russia to De-Orbit International Space Station (De-Orbit=Demolish)
Yahoo News ^ | 7/27/2011 | Yahoo News

Posted on 07/27/2011 4:21:24 PM PDT by Dallas59

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-52 last
To: Dallas59

Good riddance.


41 posted on 07/27/2011 9:28:18 PM PDT by Royal Wulff
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Revolting cat!

42 posted on 07/27/2011 9:57:49 PM PDT by JoeProBono (A closed mouth gathers no feet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: count-your-change
It might be compared to a man driving his Rolls Royce for a few years and then dumping it into the ocean.

 

... or like launching the the huge external fuel tank right up to the edge of a stable orbit, and tossing it back into the atmosphere so it would burn up rather than keep it in space to use as future building materials. The short-sightedness of government would be astounding if it weren't so horribly obvious that it is purposeful. They have no intention of ever allowing a true habitat to be built in space.

43 posted on 07/27/2011 10:10:10 PM PDT by zeugma (The only thing in the social security trust fund is your children and grandchildren's sweat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: americanophile

Still much less than what NY city spent on social services in that same period.


44 posted on 07/27/2011 10:20:26 PM PDT by <1/1,000,000th%
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: <1/1,000,000th%

In other words, everyone spent money on a bunch of crap.


45 posted on 07/27/2011 10:24:44 PM PDT by americanophile ("this absurd theology of an immoral Bedouin, is a rotting corpse which poisons our lives" - Ataturk)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Blood of Tyrants

>> If it is abandoned and not to be used again, it would be irresponsible to allow it to possibly fall on a populated area.

Target practice.


46 posted on 07/27/2011 10:27:37 PM PDT by Gene Eric (May our dreams converge for a free and prosperous nation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: jpsb

2011 LAUNCH SCHEDULE

http://www.sinodefence.com/

Rab


47 posted on 07/27/2011 10:33:08 PM PDT by Rabin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Ole Okie

How to nudge her into higher orbit really should have been thought of a few years ago. The latest adaptations were extensive, and done just within the past few years.

What a monumental waste. But that´s what barry does. Destroy. The man´s never built anything in his life. Likely not even a model plane! I believe destruction is in his soul.

God, please don´t let him go jihadi on us. Amen.


48 posted on 07/27/2011 11:03:30 PM PDT by onedoug (If)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Travis McGee

Sadly, you’re right.

We’re very close to the last step too.


49 posted on 07/27/2011 11:24:15 PM PDT by DoughtyOne ($1.8 tril yearly deficits = $18 tril in ten years. So now we're proposing $4 tril in cuts? Really?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: conservativeimage.com

It’s worse than that.

We very likely paid 80 to 90% of the total costs, then named it the international space station. We just put the last parts on it in 2010. Within months we can’t even get there to defend it.

Russia could deorbit the station today if they wanted too, and we couldn’t do squat about it.

We’ve had 40 years to design and build the replacement of the shuttle, and we’re headed towards developing an Apolo level capsule.

Wow...


50 posted on 07/27/2011 11:33:06 PM PDT by DoughtyOne ($1.8 tril yearly deficits = $18 tril in ten years. So now we're proposing $4 tril in cuts? Really?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: jonrick46

I agree with your comments. You’ve touched on several issues and I see them the same way you do.

The one thing you missed was that we have been laying off our scientific talent.

Putting that team together took time. We won’t be doing it again and that is a perpetual loss for the nation.


51 posted on 07/27/2011 11:40:55 PM PDT by DoughtyOne ($1.8 tril yearly deficits = $18 tril in ten years. So now we're proposing $4 tril in cuts? Really?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: DTA

Bookmark! Should be watched by all Freepers.


52 posted on 07/28/2011 2:49:14 AM PDT by jonrick46 (2012 can't come soon enough.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-52 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson