Just another silly liberal who can’t “win” in the arena of ideas and tries to use the force of The State to get her way.
He probably did. By using logic on her and causing her to yell.
If you want to ready what happened from eyewitness reports, read this: http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/270679/more-details-emerge-wisconsin-s-chokegate-christian-schneider
I read somewhere that she’d previously called the cops (or threatened to) because someone used a profanity.
Liberals...
That means no charges.
I agree with commenter Jenna
One person is not allowed to move aggressively into another person’s private space. Since Judge Bradley was the aggressor who moved into Judge Prosser’s private space, she was in the wrong and he had no obligation to move.
NUFF SAID!
Leak to left wing Liar and Comedy sites!!
Prosser’s first mistake was to beleive that he had an agreement with a Liberal. All the rest merely follows.
If he actually did choke some lefty judge, that would be an endearing quality as far as I’m concerned.
That lying bitch Bradley didn’t press charges for the same reason Weiner didn’t file a police report when somebody “hacked” his account.
Can Scott Walker nominate Prosser as Chief Justice, replacing this bitch?
This could get interesting...
From the Milwaukee Journal-Sentinel online: http://www.jsonline.com/news/statepolitics/124605454.html
“Two agencies are investigating a claim by Supreme Court Justice Ann Walsh Bradley that Justice David Prosser put her in a chokehold earlier this month - an allegation Gov. Scott Walker on Monday called extremely serious.”
and...”The separate investigations are being run by the Dane County Sheriff’s Office and the Wisconsin Judicial Commission, which oversees the state’s judicial ethics code.”
and...”The (judicial) commission conducts investigations in secret. If it concludes a judge has violated the judicial ethics code, it issues a formal complaint. The matter is then heard by a special panel of three appeals court judges.
The judicial panel then makes a recommendation to the Supreme Court on whether it believes the judge violated the ethics code and, if so, what punishment should be imposed. The Supreme Court would then render its ruling; it has the power to reprimand judges, censure them, suspend them without pay or remove them from office.”
In other words, if Bradley and/or Abrahamson violated judicial ethics as determined by 1) the commission, and 2) the 3-judge panel, and 3) the remaining members of the supreme court, the offenders could be removed from office, apparently immediately following the ruling by the supreme court.
This could well happen given the present political environment in Wisconsin, with Republicans controlling both arms of the legislature, the supreme court and the governorship. And you know what? It should happen. Enough of liberal lying, slandering, and winning at all costs.
Abrahamson and Bradley should be impeached. Lying to the public about a supposed crime of another justice is certainly not “good behavior,” which is the standard judges are held to while on the bench.
Has she pressed charges or notified the police of attempted murder or choking?
Did she call the police or just leak the incident to a blg?
The problem will cure itself
.