Would someone send this E.T. home.....
Posted on 06/27/2011 10:07:09 AM PDT by Sprite518
UFOs Over London BBC Radio 1 Building Right - took over a week to get it....but finally managed to get these critters on camera on a clear day, and even get a close-up. It seems to be attracting quite a crowd now when they appear. Can anyone explain what on earth these lights are please?
(Excerpt) Read more at youtube.com ...
“A separate video posted by the same user, alymc01, is believed to have been shot from inside the offices of a visual effects company called The Mill. The firm creates special effects for the film industry.”
Fake.
Crowd fake too. Yawn.
Oh well it was exciting for a few minutes... Okay sold...
Ah-ooooooo, U-FOs of London...
Well that’s pretty good visual effects.
Bigfoot is the pilot of Flying Saucers.
So how do you do that with a computer? What’s the program they are using?
Except for the purple disk that gets between the decorative trim and soffit of the adjacent building and the camera. That "UFO" would have to be no more than about 10 feet from the camera to be real. And about four inches in diameter. And translucent.
Nice rolling shutter effect! Really enhances the realism.
I’m not sure they’re using software to make the disks. Those could be some sort of lens flare effect. The fuzzy-looking things that are floating by could be done by software; I could write code to insert them using my own computer. I’m sure there are numerous video editing and effects packages that can be used to do this as well.
If they had been using software to make the disks, I don’t think they would have let the purple one in the foreground slip in there.
Did not see the “purple trim” on the adjacent building. Tell me at how many seconds in the video can you see this purple trim. I don’t see it.
I’m not following your 10 ft from the camera and 4 inches in diameter point either? Sorry.. It looks like it’s way beyond 10 feet.
I thought it was the chupacabra.
Would someone send this E.T. home.....
Well, you have been educated. It is Bigfoot. The fact that they pilot Flying Saucers explains why no Bigfoot body has ever been found. When one dies others pick up the body and take it to their home planet- Bolok!
LMAO!
I especially like the phony Blair Witch Project camera shake.
It sure looks real to me (not).
Now I can’t get that out of my head. LOL!
I aim to please. ;-)
That’s one of the most annoying videos I’ve ever watched. And yea, it’s fake; can’t believe anything coming out of England, much less London these days; they’re all bored out their skulls looking to pull pranks to stay awake long enough to collect this month’s dole. Besides that, you’ve got to know that info coming from a country where a “Yield” sign says “Give Way” is a bit “dodgy”, if you will.
So when a camera shakes then that means its fake? If it would have stayed firm (like a movie), then you would have believed it.
No.
Don’t take this the wrong way, but you have never taken a course in logic, have you...
Well, if you read my post #10 carefully, you will see that I made no reference to "purple trim" on a building, or anywhere. I don't know who was talking about "purple trim," but it wasn't me.
What I did refer to was a "purple disk that gets between the decorative trim and soffit of the adjacent building and the camera."
You can find this for yourself, if you look at the video between 1:15 and 1:23. At 1:15, the video lingers on what at first appears to be a white disk, but soon is revealed to be a lens flare caused by the direct rays of the sun which are fairly close to the optical axis of the camera's lens. What reveals it to be a lens flare is the achromatic fringing on its opposite sides; a little more reddish on its left edge, and a little more bluish on its right edge.
Then, just for a moment, at 1:22, you can see a reddish-purple disk, so foreshortened that it appears to be a line, just under the letter "A" on the sign at the left side of the frame. That's the "purple disk" I referred to in my post #10.
Actually I have and it’s why I said what I said.
Sorry if I got your panties in a wad by pointing out the obvious flaw in your logic.
Muslim flight training.
There is no flaw in Zeppo's logic whatsoever.
On the other hand, to call your reasoning "wrong" would be to give it more merit than it deserves.
Yes and sorry about the wording.
Okay I did see what you are talking about. Thanks for pointing that out. Hmmmm don’t know what to think, but you are probably correct. Thanks.
LOL!
some “flotsam and jetsam” in the air!!!!
Londonstan?
Are we sure it wasn’t the 12th Mahdi?
Okay let’s follow the logic
All “A” + “B” = “C”
If homemade video with camera(A) plus shaking video(B) means (=) fake (C).
Complete nonsense because the premiss is flawed. Zeppo is assuming all A plus all B equals C.
LOL.. Got that right!
You have made at least two errors of logic.
The first one was when you mistakenly concluded that my original statement was equivalent to asserting that, "So when a camera shakes then that means its fake?"
Not correct.
Then you compounded the problem by mistakenly concluding, "If it would have stayed firm (like a movie), then you would have believed it", which is a fallacy that roughly follows in the pattern of denying the antecedent
BTW, no panties, no wad...
You’re in way over your head here.
The nonsense on this thread is 100% generated by you. Starting with your BS about the “purple trim.”
Good grief. If you think you’re going to convince me, or anyone, that you have anything to say or any point to make by dressing it up as a fake mathematical equation, or logical syllogism, or whatever in the name of Sam Hill that is, why, you just go ahead and knock yourself out.
Have you ever heard of the movie Avatar?
Does the expression Computer-Generated Image (CGI) ring a bell?
Regards,
Okay here is your post,
“I especially like the phony Blair Witch Project camera shake.”
then you said,
“The first one was when you mistakenly concluded that my original statement was equivalent to asserting that, when a camera shakes then that means its fake”.
Okay well I’m still waiting other than “not correct” with no response other than that.
Please elaborate what you mean by “phony Blair Witch Project camera shake”?
Guess you have never heard of sarcasm???
The purpose of an antecedent(like sarcasm ) is to expose how flawed your premiss and logic is in your original point.
You obviously have anger management issues. You need help.
Many things are "obvious" to those who can't distinguish between fantasy and reality.
Like I said you have anger management issues.
If you were talking about Santa Clause or the Tooth Fairy, then I could not get as mad as you do. Seriously you need help.
If you were talking about Santa Clause or the Tooth Fairy, then I could not get as mad as you do. Seriously you need help.
Are you a psychiatrist?
I mean, in addition to being a person who has "taken a course in logic."
This is suppose to be a (break from the news) thread as I originally posted.
Now instead of just having fun with it.. You have your panties all in a wad. Just wondering is there anything you can do that does not get you upset? If so, then I suggest to do more of it. Lighten up good grief!
Are you a psychiatrist, yes or no?
The important thing here is that no video is acceptable as evidence of anything unless analyzed by a trustworthy expert. Even then, the expert is quite unlikely be able to identify what is shown on the video beyond the fact that the image has not been created by fakery.
Second, lights flitting about the sky are not evidence of intelligent control of an object. They are certainly not evidence of passenger-carrying “ships”. They are simply unexplained lights flitting about the sky. Maybe they are living creatures. Maybe they are tricks (the most likely explanation by a factor of billions or trillions on the probability scale).
And then, you get asked one little yes/no question, and all of a sudden: silence.
Probably your best response. Logical. LOL.
Intriguing video, but I have given up trusting my eyes these days. Todays video/imaging tech is too advanced to rely on what you see, unless we’re talking about the many recent birth certificates lol. Obviously authentic documents. /s
LOL! Ain’t that the truth! Thanks for the laugh.
It’s called you have issues and it’s why I am not responding. It is a fun post thread and nothing more. Save your energy for something serious.
At any just figured I would say this since you can’t get an OBVIOUS hint. So when I do not respond to future posts from you... You will now understand.
You're so full of advice for other people. It's touching.
You still haven't answered my question.
Well, actually, you have.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.