Tenth Amendment Center launches Tenther Radio

The US Report ^ | June 22, 2011 | Kay Day

[Crush]

The Tenth Amendment Center will launch a weekly show on TRX: Tenther Radio on Wednesday, June 22 beginning at 8 p.m. Eastern, 5 p.m. Pacific. Author and scholar Thomas E. Woods, Jr., will be a guest on the inaugural show. To listen go to the Tenther Radio website and click the play button.

Dr. Woods is a New York Times bestselling author who is a senior fellow of the Ludwig von Mises Institute. He holds a bachelor's degree in history from Harvard and his master's, M.Phil., and Ph.D. from Columbia University.

Woods’ book Nullification: How to Resist Federal Tyranny in the 21st Century re-introduced a concept dating to our founding fathers, that states had the right to basically opt out of federal legislation that infringed on powers reserved to the states. Woods has written numerous other books as well.

For example, states that pass medical marijuana laws are exercising a de facto form of nullification. States that do not want to participate in the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act are in effect attempting to nullify that extremely flawed legislation many call ObamaCare. Historically, states used nullification of the Federal Fugitive Slave Act—secession by Southern states was a rebuttal to that nullification.

The Tenth Amendment Center has made Americans aware of a lesser known amendment as far as the general population goes. However, in principles of personal freedom, the Tenth is just as important as any other amendment.

Woods is one of a number of scholars at the forefront of a classical liberal—the closest philosophy would be that we now call...

[steelyourfaith]

ping

[Silentgypsy]

Very interesting. Thanks for posting!

[Migraine]

Of all the awkward labels, “Tenther” has to be the worst.

How about something that rolls off the tongue, like “Radio Ten”. Or “First and Ten” (extolling Free Speech, Religion, Assembly, Petitioning the gov’t; PLUS the primacy of the states). Anything but “Tenther”.

[phockthis]

I believe this is the key to taking back our country...

Corpus Juris Secundum

The rights of the People are secured against tyranny by the judicial power of the grand jury. A grand jury that truly possesses the judicial power emanating from the People will act in harmony with the following rules from the Corpus Juris Secundum Vol. 38:
The grand jury is of ancient origin.
The grand jury is summoned to serve the court.

The grand jury is an arm of the court, but is not the court itself.
The grand jury is under the general supervision and control of the court, at least “to the extent that it is organized.” 38 C.J.S. Grand Juries, Section 1, p. 981, note 26.
The grand jury is not under the control of the court to the same extent as the petit jury.
“It is generally conceded that, after it is duly organized, the larger part of its functions is to be performed by it as a separate and independent body acting apart from the court.” Ibid., p. 981, note 34.
“It must act free from influence, fear, favor, affection, reward, or hope thereof, preceding from, or without the court.” U.S. v. Olmstead, D.C. Wash. 7 F.2nd 758[2].
Some cases hold that the grand jury is independent of the court and is separate, distinct and “may act independently of the court.” Ibid. Notes 35-413, p. 981, 982.
The grand jury is usually officered by a foreman. Ibid., p. 1009
The foreman is the presiding officer of the inquest. Ibid., p. 1010 note 74.
“The ordinary conception of the powers and duties of a grand jury is to guard the rights and liberties of the people, in the preservation of morals and social order.” Ibid., p. 1027, note 79.
The court cannot limit the grand jury in its legitimate investigation. Ibid., p. 1028, note 95.
“Members of the grand jury may bring to the attention of their members any crimes known to any of them even though no complaint is presented by any prosecuting officer.” Ibid., p. 1028, note 98.
It is the duty of the grand jury to inquire into all offenses within its jurisdiction. Ibid., p. 1029, note 5.
It cannot be a blanket inquiry to bring to light supposed grievances for the purpose of criticizing an officer or department of the government. Ibid., p. 1030, note 21.
“...a grand jury has plenary inquisitorial powers, without any instruction or authority from the court, and may, on its own motion, originate charges against offenders, regardless of how the information on which it acts is brought to its attention. Ibid., p. 1031, note 35.
“...It is empowered to institute and initiate, as well as to manage and control, such investigation, without any interference or hindrance from the court or prosecuting attorney.” Ibid., p. 1032, note 37, 38.
The manner of conducting a hearing before a grand jury depends in a large measure on the good judgment of the grand jury. Ibid., p. 1037, note 96.
It is improper for the prosecuting attorney to participate in the deliberations of the grand jury, to express opinions on questions of fact, or as to the weight and sufficiency of evidence, make arguments, or in any way influence or direct the grand jury in its findings. Ibid., p. 1042, notes 91-96.
The grand jury cannot appoint its own attorney to supplant the advice and council of the prosecuting attorney, but an attorney may be summoned to appear before the grand jury in the capacity as an expert witness(es). Ibid., p. 1046, note 26, 27.
A stenographer can be present and take down testimony and information. Ibid., p. 1046-47.
The grand jury can call witnesses before it. Ibid., p. 1049.
Grand juries are protected in the discharge of their duties during the whole of their proceedings. Ibid., p. 1065, notes 60, 61.