Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Anthony Weiner’s road back may be long (fits sex addiction)
Politico ^ | 06-13-2011 | Erica Lovely

Posted on 06/14/2011 4:32:22 AM PDT by bronxville

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-27 last
To: philman_36

“Sex addiction” my eye.

It’s a lack of character.


21 posted on 06/14/2011 8:02:43 AM PDT by MrB (The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter knows whom he's working for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: CitizenM
I am sorry you misunderstood.
I'm sorry you were not more concise.
22 posted on 06/14/2011 8:04:19 AM PDT by philman_36 (Pride breakfasted with plenty, dined with poverty, and supped with infamy. Benjamin Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: philman_36

What is the matter that you have to be so picky and catty? Do you have a chip on your shoulder about something today? We Freepers need to stick together and not be so critical of each other and things that are not the important issue. Obviously no one else felt that I was not concise as no one else responded as you did. Being kind to one another is what makes this site great. It does not take a lot to be kind and courteous. It takes more to be difficult and snotty. I will truly hope that your day is pleasant for you.


23 posted on 06/14/2011 9:12:09 AM PDT by CitizenM (If we ever forget that we're one nation under GOD, then we will be a nation gone under.-Ronald Re)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: CitizenM
What is the matter that you have to be so picky and catty?
I'm "picky" because the words you use set the tone of the conversation. You sought to, IMO, control the language being used to shape and form perceptions. That's propaganda!
You were sloughing this off as "a disability" even though you later said that's not what you meant. My "problem", if it can be considered one, is that you shouldn't have used that phraseology to begin with if that wasn't what you meant.
As to being "catty", that is your own interpretation of my responses.

Do you have a chip on your shoulder about something today?
Nope.

24 posted on 06/14/2011 9:34:45 AM PDT by philman_36 (Pride breakfasted with plenty, dined with poverty, and supped with infamy. Benjamin Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: MrB
It’s a lack of character.
Amongst other things.
25 posted on 06/14/2011 9:35:57 AM PDT by philman_36 (Pride breakfasted with plenty, dined with poverty, and supped with infamy. Benjamin Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: philman_36
Think what you like. You are like the Dems who won't believe the truth. You know what I meant, and I didn't try to slough off any unintended meaning. I know the difference in a disability per a government decision, and simply saying someone has an emotional disability because their emotional/mental state is disabled from reacting normally. Obviously that is your problem if you can't see that I meant no legal term. My son is blind...that is a disability in the eyes of the law, and I know the legal definition, thank you.

If the term I used bothers you so much that it incurs such anger from you perhaps you are emotionally challenged. No one else had ANY problem understanding the point and meaning of what I said and how I stated it. This is not a contest for a Pulitzer prize. We write quickly and we do not have to be edited.

You knew exactly what I meant and you are making a mountain out of a mole hill when, the real issue here, is that I was explaining the character and traits of a narcissist. You lost the value of that in your rush to pick on one word that you claim threw you off (and obviously over the cliff). Get over it.

26 posted on 06/14/2011 12:03:19 PM PDT by CitizenM (If we ever forget that we're one nation under GOD, then we will be a nation gone under.-Ronald Re)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: CitizenM
Think what you like.
It isn't a matter of me thinking what I will. It's simply reading through your reply on the surface and understanding what you were attempting to do.

You are like the Dems who won't believe the truth.
You are like Dems in that they twist the truth for convenience's sake.

27 posted on 06/14/2011 2:27:06 PM PDT by philman_36 (Pride breakfasted with plenty, dined with poverty, and supped with infamy. Benjamin Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-27 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson