Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

That Stupid Palin, Getting Her History Right
American Catholic ^ | June 4, 2011 A.D. | Paul Zummo

Posted on 06/04/2011 9:01:24 AM PDT by GonzoII

That Stupid Palin, Getting Her History Right

Published Saturday, June 4, 2011 A.D. | By Paul Zummo

I guess there’s a new kerfuffle related to Sarah Palin. This video was linked at NRO “without comment” by Andrew Stiles. It’s more evidence that she’s some kind of historical illiterate, or something, as she supposedly claims that Paul Revere rode to warn the Brits.

YouTube Preview Image

Admittedly Palin’s wording is incredibly garbled and she did not give a very articulate response. Here’s the thing: her comments are completely accurate. Here’s a letter written by Paul Revere himself:

“I observed a Wood at a Small distance, & made for that. When I got there, out Started Six officers, on Horse back,and orderd me to dismount;-one of them, who appeared to have the command, examined me, where I came from,& what my Name Was? I told him. it was Revere, he asked if it was Paul? I told him yes He asked me if I was an express? I answered in the afirmative. He demanded what time I left Boston? I told him; and aded, that their troops had catched aground in passing the River, and that There would be five hundred Americans there in a short time, for I had alarmed the Country all the way up. He imediately rode towards those who stoppd us, when all five of them came down upon a full gallop; one of them, whom I afterwards found to be Major Mitchel, of the 5th Regiment, Clapped his pistol to my head, called me by name, & told me he was going to ask me some questions, & if I did not give him true answers, he would blow my brains out. He then asked me similar questions to those above. He then orderd me to mount my Horse, after searching me for arms.”

Again, though spoken in mangled English, Palin’s comments are pretty much right on the money. Revere was in fact warning the British, but more as a way of bragging.

But hey, it’s so much easier to call Sarah Palin an idiot than bother with facts.



TOPICS: News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 1ifbyland2ifbysea; cultofpalin; israelbissell; onenation; palin; palinkoolaidfactory; palinrevere; paulrevere; samuelprescott; sarahpalin; williamdawes
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-45 next last
"Again, though spoken in mangled English, Palin’s comments are pretty much right on the money. Revere was in fact warning the British, but more as a way of bragging"
1 posted on 06/04/2011 9:01:27 AM PDT by GonzoII
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: GonzoII
Sarah Louise Palin

Born February 11, 1964 in Sandpoint, ID (Meets the Jus Soli Requirement)

Parents were
Charles R Heath, born in ID
Sarah Sheeran, born in WI

Both parents were US Citizens at the time of her birth (Meets the Jus Sanguinis Requirement)

Sarah Palin is a NATURAL BORN CITIZEN

Barry Soetoro aka Barack Hussein Obama isn't!

67:12

2 posted on 06/04/2011 9:05:12 AM PDT by ASA Vet (Natural-born citizens, are those born in the country, of parents who are citizens. De Vattel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GonzoII

Well, HAY,

I often write mangled sentences.

So what?


3 posted on 06/04/2011 9:05:12 AM PDT by onyx (If you truly support Sarah Palin and want to be on her busy ping list, let me know!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GonzoII

bttt


4 posted on 06/04/2011 9:05:21 AM PDT by Matchett-PI (In the latter times the man [or woman] of virtue appears vile. --Tao Te Ching)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: onyx

I hate freep forum, no edit function :( I type very fast and hit post before proof reading all the time :)


5 posted on 06/04/2011 9:08:52 AM PDT by 4rcane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: GonzoII
Whats the big deal anyway

Revere was loooong before we even had close to 57 of our states and that's a loooong time ago to remember.

6 posted on 06/04/2011 9:11:06 AM PDT by EGPWS (Trust in God, question everyone else)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 4rcane

LOL. I rarely, if ever proof read!


7 posted on 06/04/2011 9:12:00 AM PDT by onyx (Quaker)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: GonzoII
The Leftists-created Orwellian Brave New World we live in:

"Progressives" cause regression and degeneration.

The "Intellectual Elite" actually embrace and adhere to the irrational.

8 posted on 06/04/2011 9:12:26 AM PDT by PapaNew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GonzoII

And here references to the bells:

History of the Battle of Lexington, on the Morning of the 19th April 1775
BY ELIAS PHINNEY
“They (British soldiers)de-tained him (Revere), with the other three prisoners from Lexington, till near three o’clock in the morning, when, finding no prospect of escape, Revere, in his turn, attempted to frighten them, by telling them, in a very triumphant tone of voice, “Gentlemen, you have missed your aim. I left Boston after your troops had landed at Lechmere’s Point, and if I had not been certain, that the people, to the distance of fifty miles into the country, had been notified of your movements, I would have risked one shot, before you should have taken me.” Another told them, “The bell’s ringing, the country is alarmed, and you are all dead men.” This appeared, in some measure, to alarm the officers.”

pages 18,19
http://www.archive.org/stream/historyofbattleo01phin/historyofbattleo01phin_djvu.txt

NOTE: THERE ARE TWO STATEMENTS INCLUDED IN THE BOOK, ONE BY Nathan Monroe(Munroe sic) and one by Amos Lock who give evidience of the ALARM BELLS RINGING.


9 posted on 06/04/2011 9:13:21 AM PDT by BilLies (r)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GonzoII

What exactly did she say that was wrong?


10 posted on 06/04/2011 9:15:11 AM PDT by Ditter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GonzoII

What’s funny/sad is that liberals have so dumbed down public education, most Obama voters don’t know or even care who Paul Revere was.


11 posted on 06/04/2011 9:18:26 AM PDT by Cringing Negativism Network (BUY AMERICAN. The job you save will be your son's, or your daughter's)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GonzoII

My! That’s the worst “pic” of her I’ve ever seen! They must have combed through a video very carefully, looking for the worst frame to freeze!


12 posted on 06/04/2011 9:30:05 AM PDT by Dr. Bogus Pachysandra ( Ya can't pick up a turd by the clean end!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GonzoII

Admittedly Palin’s wording is incredibly garbled and she did not give a very articulate response.****************

Setting all that aside for just a moment, the more important question now becomes...How do you say it in Austrian?


13 posted on 06/04/2011 9:31:43 AM PDT by bereanway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Bogus Pachysandra
My! That’s the worst “pic” of her I’ve ever seen! They must have combed through a video very carefully, looking for the worst frame to freeze!

Sarah is like family; no matter how "bad" a photo makes her look, it always brings a smile to my face.

14 posted on 06/04/2011 9:38:55 AM PDT by Publius6961 (you don't need a president-for-life if you've got a bureaucracy-for-life.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Bogus Pachysandra
My! That’s the worst “pic” of her I’ve ever seen! They must have combed through a video very carefully, looking for the worst frame to freeze!

If that's how good she looks at her worst, other women can just give up now. She is truly beautiful, and I think she wears glasses to soften the impact. Even the loathsome Alec Baldwin said she was "hot" when he met her in person on SNL. Tina Fey looked like a crone beside her.

15 posted on 06/04/2011 9:43:05 AM PDT by Albion Wilde (Thank you, Dubya and U.S. military. You did not falter. You did not fail.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: zot; Interesting Times

palin ping


16 posted on 06/04/2011 9:43:57 AM PDT by GreyFriar (Spearhead - 3rd Armored Division 75-78 & 83-87)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #17 Removed by Moderator

To: GonzoII

Hey, Palin was focusing on “warning the British” because that’s what she and the Tea Party are doing: they warning the establishment that they’ve rallied the patriots and that they (the establishment) had better get with the program demanded by the people. It’s a subtle point because who knows that, in addition to rallying the patriots, Revere, when caught by the British, told them that they had better watch out. I, myself, didn’t know it before this item.


18 posted on 06/04/2011 9:47:17 AM PDT by Redmen4ever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: onyx; 4rcane

What’s proof reading? /sarc


19 posted on 06/04/2011 9:50:54 AM PDT by WVKayaker (Praise God from Whom all blessings flow!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Ditter

Nothing. Once again she made fools of those who bash her. I have to wonder if she intentionally laid that trap. It would not surprise me. She brilliantly turns their mendacity against them. Again and again.


20 posted on 06/04/2011 9:58:35 AM PDT by Josephat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-45 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson