Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

5 Reasons High Fructose Corn Syrup Will Kill You

Posted on 05/22/2011 11:11:23 AM PDT by DannyTN

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-154 next last
To: DannyTN

You can have my corn syrup when you pry it from my cold, sticky fingers.
21 posted on 05/22/2011 11:36:23 AM PDT by Repeal The 17th (Proud to be a (small) monthly donor.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: savagesusie

I’m not about to take seriously anything Europe does.


22 posted on 05/22/2011 11:36:42 AM PDT by caww
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: DannyTN
I have concerns about HFCS but after reading this liberal style trash-rant I have fewer.

23 posted on 05/22/2011 11:38:05 AM PDT by I see my hands (Embrace misanthropy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Repeal The 17th

Right! and fast food french fries suck! I stopped eating them long ago and make my own now...delicious!


24 posted on 05/22/2011 11:38:13 AM PDT by caww
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: DannyTN

BUMP


25 posted on 05/22/2011 11:38:33 AM PDT by FreeMaine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Repeal The 17th

I understand Karo is not the same as the HFCS we’re talking about. Different manufacturing process.


26 posted on 05/22/2011 11:38:33 AM PDT by DannyTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Repeal The 17th

Right! and fast food french fries suck! I stopped eating them long ago and make my own now...delicious!


27 posted on 05/22/2011 11:40:08 AM PDT by caww
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Repeal The 17th

Right! and fast food french fries suck! I stopped eating them long ago and make my own now...delicious!


28 posted on 05/22/2011 11:40:18 AM PDT by caww
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: DannyTN

I blame gym teachers. If they did their jobs rather then throw out a few balls, more kids would get the required exercise they need to stay fit and this becomes irrelevant.


29 posted on 05/22/2011 11:40:27 AM PDT by EQAndyBuzz (Who is John Galt?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: caww

sorry for the triple post...don’t know what happened.


30 posted on 05/22/2011 11:41:32 AM PDT by caww
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: DannyTN

Drink water instead of soda pop - stands to reason a) you’ll be better off and b) you’ll save money.


31 posted on 05/22/2011 11:41:38 AM PDT by 2 Kool 2 Be 4-Gotten (Welcome to the USA - where every day is Backwards Day!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DannyTN

Regardless of the possible health hazards, HFCS exists solely because of government subsidies. High tariffs on imported sugar and subsidies of sugar beet farmers make price of sugar in the US far above the world market price, thus manufacturers quickly turned to HFCS as a cheaper substitute. Members of Congress from corn growing states embraced HFCS as a new market for corn and got generous campaign donations from ADM. Now the government’s push for corn ethanol has raised corn prices increasing not only food costs but also the price of HFCS so sugar is making a comeback. I seek out products that use sugar and the new “retro” Pepsi products actually taste better... like they used to before HFCS.


32 posted on 05/22/2011 11:42:44 AM PDT by The Great RJ (1`1)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: savagesusie
Why would Europeans do such a thing as restrict corn syrup additives without scientific reasons.

Europe doesn't have a huge corn lobby.

33 posted on 05/22/2011 11:42:53 AM PDT by randita
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: DannyTN

Crapola.


34 posted on 05/22/2011 11:43:40 AM PDT by ozzymandus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: randita
Europe doesn't have a huge corn lobby.

Nor a high tax on sugar ...

35 posted on 05/22/2011 11:44:01 AM PDT by SeeSac
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Marie Antoinette

Pinylingadingdong.


36 posted on 05/22/2011 11:44:30 AM PDT by Big Giant Head (Two years no AV, no viruses, computer runs great!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blueyon; DannyTN

White table sugar (sucrose), in small quantities, is beneficial, I believe. I’m basing that on sugar’s historical use as a medicine and an effective vehicle for other medications, and on my own personal experience. Nothing is better as a beverage, when sick with influenza, than slow sips of a sucrose-sweetened soda.


37 posted on 05/22/2011 11:48:19 AM PDT by thecodont
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Repeal The 17th

I remember my mom using corn syrup to make formula in the 50s. I figure that was different from the HFCS.


38 posted on 05/22/2011 11:50:32 AM PDT by libbylu ( Sarah Palin has more intestinal fortitude than 535 congress critters)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: DannyTN

The body can not distinguish between sugar from cane or sugar from corn. The body reacts exactly the same way to all sugars, by releasing insulin to digest the sugar.


39 posted on 05/22/2011 11:50:32 AM PDT by repub4ever1 (Capitalism is not perfect, but it beats all other systems hands down.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: randita

The story:

The U.S. government has devotedly jacked up American sugar prices far above world market prices since the close of the War of 1812. The sugar industry is one of America’s oldest infant industries — yet it dodders with the same uncompetitiveness that it showed during the second term of James Madison. Few cases better illustrate how trade policy can be completely immune to economic sense.

The U.S. imposed high tariffs on sugar in 1816 in order to placate the growers in the newly acquired Louisiana territory. In the 1820s, sugar plantation owners complained that growing sugar in the United States was “warring with nature” because the U.S. climate was unsuited to sugar production. Naturally, the plantation owners believed that all Americans should be conscripted into the “war.” Protectionists warned that if sugar tariffs were lifted, then the value of slaves working on the sugar plantations would collapse — thus causing a general fall in slave values throughout the South.

More:

http://www.fff.org/freedom/0498d.asp


40 posted on 05/22/2011 11:51:08 AM PDT by SeeSac
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-154 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson