To: chessplayer
So? The people in the WTC were unarmed when they were murdered.
2 posted on
05/03/2011 5:35:23 PM PDT by
stboz
To: chessplayer
If he had been sleeping soundly, he should have been taken out.
3 posted on
05/03/2011 5:38:12 PM PDT by
dynachrome
("Our forefathers didn't bury their guns. They buried those that tried to take them.")
To: chessplayer
"How did we go from Bin Laden had a weapon and was using his wife as a human shield to Bin Laden was unarmed and didnt have a human shield in the span of 24 hours when theres apparently helmet-cam footage of the whole raid? It's called political spin, and the White House has their machine turned up to maximum rpm.
4 posted on
05/03/2011 5:40:00 PM PDT by
Windflier
(To anger a conservative, tell him a lie. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth.)
To: chessplayer
According to the photo they released, Obama and his aides watched the action live. So how they could not describe what happened accurately is a mystery. Makes one wonder if they were actually watching a movie.
5 posted on
05/03/2011 5:40:02 PM PDT by
Wolfstar
("If you would win a man to your cause, first convince him that you are his friend." Abraham Lincoln)
To: chessplayer
I told mu nephew today that before this was over they would have the Seals on trial.
If they do we need to tear down the courthouse.
Obama is trying to take credit, it’s time he took the heat also.
6 posted on
05/03/2011 5:40:22 PM PDT by
Venturer
To: chessplayer
“I knew from past intelligence that UBL was known to be armed, his hands where hidden from view, he did not respond to orders to show his hands and surrender. I believed my life and the lives of my fellow SEALs were in real and immediate danger.”
“And he just needed killin’.”
To: chessplayer
At least he was given the chance to surrender.
It sure would have been great to be a fly on the wall to see how long it was from the time he said "NO" until the time the bullet forced the issue.
8 posted on
05/03/2011 5:41:47 PM PDT by
Falcon4.0
To: chessplayer
Michael Savage made quite an issue today about this very issue. He asked if it makes sense Obama didn't reach for a weapon the moment he knew the compound was under assault. He also cited reports that there were no security forces on site and asked if that made sense.
In both cases, assuming the second is true, my response is "no".
In time a number of questions about this operation are sure to emerge. These are a start.
10 posted on
05/03/2011 5:54:11 PM PDT by
Robwin
To: chessplayer
In the article:
When Benson asked the first U.S. official whether bin Laden tried to grab a weapon or physically attack a commando, the official said only, He didnt hold up his hands and surrender.
That's sounds like justification to shoot to me!
To: chessplayer
Didnt they
watch the video before chatting with the press? That would be, like, professional dude, you know, and adult, and establishment, and like why would he want to be all stuff and checking on what he says like it's planned out and all when we elected him to end Bush's wars in Afghanistan, Iraq, and Libya, and to close Gitmo, and not waterboard because that doesn't work, and all?
12 posted on
05/03/2011 6:03:42 PM PDT by
Pollster1
(Natural born citizen of the USA, with the birth certificate to prove it)
To: chessplayer
There was a $25million bounty on OBL..
.....I want to know who cashed the check.
13 posted on
05/03/2011 6:29:37 PM PDT by
B.O. Plenty
(Give war a chance...)
To: chessplayer
I don’t care if he was watching “Jeopardy” and eating a nutty buddy and they shot him in the back. He’s gone just like a rodent.
19 posted on
05/03/2011 9:08:59 PM PDT by
Georgia Girl 2
(The only purpose of a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped.)
To: chessplayer
Thoght OBL ALWAYS had an AK-47 by his side?
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson