Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

How bin Laden Catapulted One Man Into War [Al Qaeda in Iraq!]
Wall Street Journal Online ^ | May 3, 2011 | John Bussey

Posted on 05/03/2011 12:39:14 PM PDT by Enchante

Fast forward to a day in Anbar Province, Iraq. Mr. Pottinger, now an intelligence officer supporting an infantry battalion, is standing over the body of a high level al Qaeda operative that his unit has just killed. It was an intense and lengthy manhunt. Mr. Pottinger is rifling through the man’s pockets, looking for additional documentation. Nearby is the mangled body of the man’s guard, who moments before detonated a suicide vest in a last, and failed, effort to kill the attackers.

“I was standing over this guy’s corpse, looking down at him and thinking of all of the resources we had devoted to killing him....

(Excerpt) Read more at blogs.wsj.com ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: alqaeda; binladen; bush; cia; intel; iraq; marines; military; obama; osama; osamabinladenkilled; terrorism; wot
article is primarily about one man's experiences and changing views on how to fight Al Qaeda, but I was particularly struck by the passage about killing a "high level Al Qaeda operative" in Iraq...... since we have so often been assured that Iraq had nothing nothing nothing to do with fighting Al Qaeda or the War on Terror......

and a WaPo article has asserted that the first crucial lead which led to Bin Laden's courier and to Bin Laden himself was from another high-level Al Qaeda operative captured in...... IRAQ.

Whatever else one thinks about Iraq, we killed lots of Al Qaeda there, used it as flypaper to attract and kill terrorists from all over, and got invaluable intel which eventually led us to Bin Laden himself. Libs will CONTINUE to try to ignore, downplay, and/or mis-represent the facts of the past 10-20 years. We must get the most complete and accurate info circulated asap.

1 posted on 05/03/2011 12:39:20 PM PDT by Enchante
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Enchante
It's undeniable that there were more Al-Qaeda in Iraq after we invaded than before we invaded, but that's only part of the big picture.

No less than Donald Rumsfeld questioned if we were creating more terrorists than we were killing.

The new regime in Washington, D.C. is almost indistinguishable in its policies from the previous one, or is benefitting from those policies. Responsibility imposes a more honest appraisal of what can or can't be done, sometimes the only choice is between bad and worse.
2 posted on 05/03/2011 1:52:33 PM PDT by kenavi ("Anything that can't stand up to ribbing isn't worth much to begin with." Eric Idle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Enchante

Many of us knew of these connections from the very beginning. Articles on FR made it clear that Saddam had been working with and supporting Al Queda from the start of its war against us. Even the Aspirin factory Clinton blew up had Iraqi connections.


3 posted on 05/03/2011 5:21:31 PM PDT by arrogantsob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kenavi

What has always been undeniable is the close connection Saddam had with terrorists of every stripe including Al Queda. His intelligence agents were intimately involved with OBL’s group (whatever its name at a particular time) from his emergence as an enemy of the US.


4 posted on 05/03/2011 5:24:28 PM PDT by arrogantsob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson