Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Jan Brewer vetoes Arizona’s “Birther bill” [Any Arizonans willing and able to explain?]
Hot Air ^ | April 18, 2011 | ALLAHPUNDIT

Posted on 04/18/2011 7:24:39 PM PDT by RobinMasters

Not the only veto she issued tonight, either. She also rejected a bill that would have allowed people to carry guns on state college campuses on grounds that it was “poorly written.” Not a total surprise given the political climate in the state after Gabby Giffords’s shooting, but a mild surprise given the grassroots conservative cred Brewer built for herself by championing Arizona’s immigration law.

This one’s a genuine surprise, though.

Arizona Gov. Jan Brewer on Monday vetoed a bill to require President Barack Obama and other presidential candidates to prove their U.S. citizenship before their names can appear on the state’s ballot…

“I do not support designating one person [i.e. the secretary of state] as the gatekeeper to the ballot for a candidate, which could lead to arbitrary or politically motivated decisions,” said Brewer, who was secretary of state until she became governor in 2009.

“In addition, I never imagined being presented with a bill that could require candidates for president of the greatest and most powerful nation on Earth to submit their ‘early baptismal circumcision certificates’ among other records to the Arizona secretary of state,” she said. “This is a bridge too far.

I’m guessing there’s some local political angle that explains this, but I can’t figure out what it is and some furious googling reveals nothing. Any Arizonans willing and able to explain? She just started her new term so electoral politics is immaterial. Is there some core agenda item that she needs Democratic help to pass? Or is she trying to build goodwill with Obama for better cooperation on immigration? Or, just maybe, did she genuinely believe that the bill was stupid and embarrassing to Arizona? All theories welcome.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: certifigate; janbrewerbirtherbill
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-94 next last
To: Cementjungle

Not so quick to slam, any one checked out this legislation, it could well be junk construct. Gotten to, not, Jan is a pretty sharp kid.

Rabin


21 posted on 04/18/2011 7:38:16 PM PDT by Rabin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Cementjungle

Politics is dirty - RAT politics is TRASH!!!


22 posted on 04/18/2011 7:39:49 PM PDT by Mr. Wright
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: RobinMasters

This may sound like a little bit of stretch, but here it goes.
Maybe the thinking among those republicans is that Obama is very defeatable. If he is knocked out of the race we may have Hillary to deal with come Nov. 2012 and a re energized Democrat party. With the Republicans in control of the House Obama is handicapped as to what he can do so lets wait him out.


23 posted on 04/18/2011 7:41:16 PM PDT by MCF
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Flying right

I know. In this day and age how difficult would be to get a certified birth certificate. Or at least make the law ambiguous enough to allow the Sec. of State to be able to determine if the “source’ of information is adequate.


24 posted on 04/18/2011 7:41:16 PM PDT by Vermont Lt (How long before the Mall becomes Tahifir Sq?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Jim 0216

I’m thinking the same thing. It seems it would only need a small modification to allow for a panel to approve or deny versus a single person.

I do wonder why the dems overwhelmingly supported it unless they salivated at the idea of a future Dem SoS abusing this privilege.


25 posted on 04/18/2011 7:41:19 PM PDT by mnehring
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Inyo-Mono

Disappointing but if only ONE state adopts such a law the jig is up for Urkel.


26 posted on 04/18/2011 7:41:31 PM PDT by arrogantsob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: RobinMasters
I hope they vote again and pass her veto. Sitting here open jawed. . . Just can't believe this. Here I sent the AZ law to all my Idaho legislators. . a lot of people working on eligibility in their states. Thanks a lot Jan. . .
27 posted on 04/18/2011 7:41:59 PM PDT by Art in Idaho (Conservatism is the only hope for Western Civilization.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RobinMasters
As good as she has been for our state, this just proves once and for all the US CONSTITUTION MEANS NOTHING IN 2011

No one dare challenge the black man.
28 posted on 04/18/2011 7:43:32 PM PDT by Cheerio (Barry Hussein Soetoro-0bama=The Complete Destruction of American Capitalism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RobinMasters

I’m not from AZ, but from what I understand, her veto was based on the language of the bill.

The one thing we don’t need is another bill passed that is labeled one thing, but does another.

Like the ‘internet neutrality’ bill.

The devil is in the details.


29 posted on 04/18/2011 7:46:35 PM PDT by UCANSEE2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RobinMasters

Sounds like it was a pretty worthless bill anyway. It allowed several other forms of easily faked “proof”.


30 posted on 04/18/2011 7:47:01 PM PDT by cripplecreek (Remember the River Raisin! (look it up))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mnehring

If in committee or panel, I think it should somehow still be voted on by the state legislature at the time because it’s a pretty big deal: calling an act or a candidate unqualified constitutionally. Almost certain to be challenged by the Feds, so the state should be solid in its resolution I think.


31 posted on 04/18/2011 7:47:14 PM PDT by Jim 0216
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Vermont Lt

Right! And, a boy is circumsized some 8 days after he is born. This is no proof that he was born where he was circumsized. Ditto for baptisms.


32 posted on 04/18/2011 7:48:07 PM PDT by Flying right
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Edgar3

Also think she has been spoken to. She has been at the White House a few times.


33 posted on 04/18/2011 7:49:23 PM PDT by mojo114 (Pray for our military)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: RobinMasters
Jan Brewer is not a conservative. She supported McCain. Her poll numbers were low until the AZ immigration bill was passed and sent to her desk. By signing it, she guaranteed her victory as governor.

I wonder if she will sign the birth certificate bill that has been passed by the AZ legislature. I have my doubts. McCain is probably counseling against it.

34 posted on 04/18/2011 7:50:52 PM PDT by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: digger48

That’s what I figured. The bill is garbage that basically ignores the Constitutional requirement to be NBC and essentially creates a bunch more loopholes out of easily forged documents.


35 posted on 04/18/2011 7:52:21 PM PDT by TigersEye (Who crashed the markets on 9/15/08 and why?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Rabin

Jan is as dumb as a sack of rocks. McCain is the puppeteer.


36 posted on 04/18/2011 7:53:22 PM PDT by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: scooby321

Trump is going to have something to say about this.

Pop some corn.


37 posted on 04/18/2011 7:53:45 PM PDT by quantim (Victory is not relative, it is absolute.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: RobinMasters

Very,very disappointed with Gov. Brewer.


38 posted on 04/18/2011 7:55:24 PM PDT by Cyman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: digger48

The bill uses the same language and document requirements as someone who applies for a US passport. This is not a flawed bill. Obama would have to present his long form birth certificate or other document listed. The fix is in.


39 posted on 04/18/2011 7:56:07 PM PDT by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: RobinMasters

well, i’m so glad people can now get on the ballot for president of the united states without having to provide eligibility requirements

i think i’ll start a campaign to get mittens, the international cat of mystery, onto the ballot


40 posted on 04/18/2011 7:59:33 PM PDT by sten (fighting tyranny never goes out of style)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-94 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson