Posted on 04/06/2011 3:18:51 AM PDT by Virginia Ridgerunner
Finding a way to "live within the budget" does nothing to scale back the Leviathan bent on crushing us.
Not into day dreaming, I do real facts, numbers, and what is possible. This is just the same old newt glide path dress up with lipstick.
Interesting. I asked you what you proposed. But you answered my question with a question.
Where are all these alleged facts?
Graph in post 16, can you read a graph, spending at a slower rate, is the Ryan budget. Country still goes broke and the can is kicked down the road. You are welcome to support it all you wish.
I hate to agree but I do... and I have prepared. I was a Boy Scout and loved it... they taught me to be prepared. I have always followed that creed.
LLS
A motto that will never fail you.
LLS
Read my post 48... gotta run... customers you know.
LLS
Whaaa? You could make the very same “points” opposing ANY plan. What do you suggest - realistically?
You are correct, more republicans support continued spending than reducing the government. In the back rooms they are slapping the democrats backs and saying just help use fool the rubs and everything will be ok.
This glide path stuff is not going to win the next election.
The plan looks ok, but does it address natural disasters? More wars? Longer and longer time overseas fighting the current THREE wars we are into? Illegal immigration and all the benefits we provide to any and all who crawl over our fences to set up housekeeping in the U.S.?
It has some good points — don’t get me wrong. And we have to start somewhere. But I’m going to write Ryan and ask him to address the above issues as well.
But you said his plan is no different than Ozero’s.
I say that’s false. So, I asked for more information. I guess you’re not up to it.
For my part, Ryan’s plan spends less - far less. So it’s the best alternative right now IMO -
Other arguments can be made - but Ryan’s budget is far better than anything else I’ve seen.
Again, if you have a better alternative, let’s hear it.
My question is “what do YOU support instead?”
You have no answer.
Your unrealistic approach is worthless.
Q.E.D.
Absolutely.
LLS
I’m glad Sarah is supporting Ryan’s budget. Obama doesn’t even have a budget to speak of, and the Democrats in Congress are pretending to make minor cuts in order to look like they are trying. The fact is, we need to look at the budget in a mature and credible way, with an eye towards the increasing debt and all the problems that will bring to the USA. Sarah’s endorsement is great to see, and goes a long way towards convincing me that this is a good start.
I think his budget is inspired by Governor Palin’s own performance in Alaska
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.