Posted on 03/24/2011 8:47:58 AM PDT by TaraP
But you will be marked as a 'homophobe' and looked at with suspicion by the 'tolerant' ones. In other words, your career in the military is at a roadblock.
The problem they are having is that morality and a code of conduct does not ***exist** in homosexuality, because at it’s core homosexuality is immoral...
They know how to enforce morality in heterosexuality because it comes from biblical standards and commandments...
How do you make something *Moral* that has always been abnormal and immoral in the fabric of society...
I am sure you are right, the commander’s order is going into your service jacket and you will carry that mark.
Imagine when you check in at your next duty station and you find out your commander/division officer is gay? You have marked yourself for special treatment until you are rotated out. That can be a hard 3-4 years of abusive treatment that you can’t do anything about.
Yes, it is a conflict, in being tolerant of this, they in fact end up promoting it due to the special status it is being given.
Yep, it is about destroying the USA in any way they can...
What happens if you say the word *Sissy* or *Queer* is that grounds for a court martial???
The rest of the platoon should resign their commission as a group. See # 26 and # 27 in the Communists goals for bringing down the United States. The document you will see is part of the Congressional Record from 1963. While the American people were being brainwashing by Communist operatives these insidious goals were being brought to fruition in American life. None of this was an accident, folks.
http://www.uhuh.com/nwo/communism/comgoals.htm
Wow..
Do you think the Military is truly aware of this?
life-imitates-Gomer Pyle....
Sorta gives making out at the NCO or Officers club a whole new meaning.
This is what the repeal of DADT was all about. Most people think its repeal was for "fairness," but they were wrong. The repeal was for EXTRA rights for homofags. Oopsie.
excellent
excellent
do ask, do tell
The Army training is that any policies have to be neutral. So, if it’s against a commander’s policy for no PDA while in uniform, then it’s supposed to apply to everybody. We’ll see how this actually works in practice, though.
You know how it works, the argument is “even if the policy is neutral, the effect of it isn’t”
Any officer writing them up would have to justify that they would write up a heterosexual couple as well. If they have been in the service for 30 years and only wrote up one other couple for the same thing, they will point out that this wasn’t enforced neutrally.
Exactly.
veteran of two services, served in iraq. when they passed this, i threw away all my shirts that said “army” on them. how sad that I am now ashamed of my country.
Puke.
You are saying “marching in civilian clothes” means “readily identifiable as a member of the military”?
They are flaunting their military associations. That hasn’t been permitted previously.
It gives the impression that the military supports something when it doesn’t.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.