Let me make this perfectly clear.....if mcpain is for it, I am against it...just as simple as that
Isn’t it ironic that the same week that there is a debate about whether to get involved helping the rebels in Libya we had an Islamic Kosovo national open fire on our military men in Germany, killing two in the name of jihad—??
Ironic because of course Clinton and Blair entered the Kosovo fracas in the 1990s on the side of the Muzzies and helped them win, beefing up al Qaeda among other horrible results, and proving as it did in Germany the other day that when it comes to the Muzzies, no good deed (by us) goes unpunished (by them).
Oh well. McCain has gone ignored before. Hopefully again.
As soon as I read the title of thought you, then noticed that you posted this so no need to ping. Came in to feel all of the love for mccrazy lol.
This idiot is such an embarrassment to republicans.
How about we name how we feel about McCain as McCain Truth Syndrome, aka MTS?
Since McRino is another one of Soros lap dogs...this isn’t too much of a surprise...Soros is pushing the NWO and the Kings and Dictators in the ME must go...
A no-fly zone and a Democrat President? 8 years of Saddam shooting at our pilots in a no-fly zone still doesn’t set good with this American. Start and finish in a few days or stay out.
Uh... no you liberal traitorous jerk face.
LLS
I’m sorry did Congress already give the ok to go to war in Libya while I was asleep or something?
We should give McCain his own plane, and tell him to have at it. In addition to flying it himself, he can also use his own money for the fuel, maintenance, and he can arm it up too.
John: Step 1, sit down. Step 2, shut up. Step 3, think before you next open your mouth. Step 4, After thinking, shut up anyway.
Only if it meant the Congress debating a Declaration of War over the Pan Am bombing (which it should have done in the first place).
Absent that Juan, sit down and STFU you liberal RINO.
IF we weren’t tied down with two major theater war efforts..
IF we had a clear line of influence on who would take over, post-Gaddafi..
IF we were willing to commit fully to a favorable outcome..
Then, maybe so. But those conditions don’t exist, so NO!
I’ve been torn on this one from the start. I despise Gaddafi, but he’s the known entity in a very volatile place. We know how to keep him contained.
If he’s overthrown, however... the possibility of a hardline, Iranian-style regime coming to power there is very real.
In a turbulent world, with a horrendously weak “leader” in the WH, with too much American firepower tied down in other regions, the (very unfortunate, but) “best” bet is leaving Gaddafi where he is.