Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Report: Seizing of Pirate Chiefs Questioned in Killings of Four Americans (FBI screw up?)
Fox News ^ | February 24, 2011

Posted on 02/24/2011 9:27:43 AM PST by Pan_Yan

...

The New York Times reports that an FBI hostage-rescue negotiator aboard the U.S.S. Sterett came to believe the two Somalis were not serious when they boarded the vessel. Once those men were taken into custody, U.S. officials told the pirates on the yacht -- called the Quest -- to send over someone they could negotiate with.

The events that immediately followed have been sharply contested and raises questions about the decision to detain the pirate leaders, the Times reports.

American officials said the pirates on the yacht seemed relieved — even “exceptionally calm” — when they were told their senior commander was cooling his heels in a Navy brig.

...

(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: bibles; fbi; piracy; pirates; somalia; somalipirates
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-90 next last
To: Jim Noble

At the Virginia ratification debate Patrick Henry spoke on “due process” for terrorists:

“He was an enemy to the human name. Those who declare war against the human race may be struck out of existence as soon as they are apprehended. He was not executed according to those beautiful legal ceremonies which are pointed out by the laws in criminal cases. The enormity of his crimes did not entitle him to it. I am truly a friend to legal forms and methods; but, sir, the occasion warranted the measure.
A pirate, an outlaw, or a common enemy to all mankind, may be put to death at any time. It is justified by the laws of nature and nations. “


21 posted on 02/24/2011 9:57:08 AM PST by mrsmith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Pan_Yan

I did not know the FBI is now an international police force. Nice to know /sarc Clinton and his fools started a lot of this, IMO, but Obama takes everything to a whole new level. We should just say that we will kill pirates no matter what, even if the hostages die. Then, what would be the point of kidnapping them?


22 posted on 02/24/2011 9:57:32 AM PST by PghBaldy (Like the Ft Hood Killer, James Earl Ray was just stressed when he killed MLK Jr.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lormand

Why don’t we put a bunch of Navy Seals on boats that look like easy targets and send them into that area? They could draw the pirates in and blow them out of the water.


23 posted on 02/24/2011 9:58:07 AM PST by peeps36 (America is being destroyed by filthy traitors in the political establishment)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: DesertRhino

If Obama’s to blame - then he needs to say how he will fix it for the next time.
If FBI’s to blame - then they need to say how they will do differently for the next time.
If pirates are to be blamed - well, .... how will they do it next time...
Because it will be a next time...Somebody better fix this...


24 posted on 02/24/2011 9:58:58 AM PST by savage woman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: OldDeckHand
A couple hundred years ago we had problems with pirates. Then we hung or killed everyone of them caught. After a while, pirates that deemed the chance of dying not worth the chance of success gave up the pirate life. No more pirates. It would work now. Once their pirate buddies seen the pirate boats leave and never return they would also give up. No quarter for pirates. Sink them on sight. Might lose some hostages, but after a while people who are potential hostages would understand the rick of entering an area where they may become hostages. Poof, no more hostages.
25 posted on 02/24/2011 10:00:04 AM PST by lynn4303
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: OldDeckHand

Bringing the FBI to the indian ocean makes a much sense as calling a navy officer to a bank heist. They are no good,,, furthermore, they’ll turn on their host and prosecute them if they feel the need. Useless,,,


26 posted on 02/24/2011 10:00:20 AM PST by DesertRhino (I was standing with a rifle, waiting for soviet paratroopers, but communists just ran for office)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Pan_Yan
The New York Times reports

That says it all, typical anti-U.S. bias from the press. Those poor little pirates./sarcasm

27 posted on 02/24/2011 10:01:22 AM PST by Texas Fossil (Government, even in its best state is but a necessary evil; in its worst state an intolerable one)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: forgotten man
That would be a waste of ammunition. A rope tied to an anchor would be sufficient.

Anchors are MUCH more costly than bullets! But the rope is pretty cheap- and reusable! Hang 'em.

28 posted on 02/24/2011 10:01:39 AM PST by JimRed (Excising a cancer before it kills us waters the Tree of Liberty! TERM LIMITS, NOW AND FOREVER!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: forgotten man
That would be a waste of ammunition. A rope tied to an anchor would be sufficient.

Anchors are MUCH more costly than bullets! But the rope is pretty cheap- and reusable! Hang 'em.

29 posted on 02/24/2011 10:01:55 AM PST by JimRed (Excising a cancer before it kills us waters the Tree of Liberty! TERM LIMITS, NOW AND FOREVER!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: T-Bird45

Bingo.


30 posted on 02/24/2011 10:02:11 AM PST by Mr. Lucky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Jim Noble

I fully agree that the military of every branch generally has a screwed-up ROE that is preventing true victory. I believe my point is corollary to a screwed-up ROE by having FBI involved and compounded by DOD lawyers using the ROE as a cudgel over military commanders. A properly employed military force that is given mission-type orders (”Bad guys! Sic-em!”) will achieve results. Best example: SOF in early Afghanistan engagements.


31 posted on 02/24/2011 10:03:27 AM PST by T-Bird45 (It feels like the seventies, and it shouldn't.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: bvw
correct. the fault is with the idiots that concoct a policy that makes no sense and gets people killed
32 posted on 02/24/2011 10:04:03 AM PST by paul51 (11 September 2001 - Never forget)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: PghBaldy
"I did not know the FBI is now an international police force."

The FBI is not an international police force, but the FBI does have agents stationed in dozens, perhaps more than a 100 countries. Over 50 of our embassies has an FBI legal attaché office, staffed with at least one FBI agent. We have agents embedded with dozens of allied police organizations, and those agents work on police investigations that deal either directly with American citizen victims and/or criminals, or crimes against American-owned interests abroad.

The FBI is not a global police force, but it is an American federal police force with a global footprint.

33 posted on 02/24/2011 10:06:21 AM PST by OldDeckHand (So long as we have SEIU, who needs al-Qaeda?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: JimRed

Throw them overboard “Sharks have to eat too!”.; to paraphrase Josie Wales.


34 posted on 02/24/2011 10:07:50 AM PST by GOYAKLA (Flush Congress in 2010 & 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: DesertRhino
"Bringing the FBI to the indian ocean makes a much sense as calling a navy officer to a bank heist."

Sure it does. The UN Navy does not have assets trained to deal with hostage negotiation. That is a the job of a federal law enforcement agency. If not the FBI, then it would likely fall to NCIS.

35 posted on 02/24/2011 10:10:09 AM PST by OldDeckHand (So long as we have SEIU, who needs al-Qaeda?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: OldDeckHand
I wouldn't agree with that, at all. They are quite clearly your run-of-the-mill criminals. They aren't pirating to advance some 14th Century religious belief, or to protest against some political policy. They're pirating for cash, which is the motive of virtually every criminal.

Whether it's kidnapping for ransom in Columbia, stagecoach robberies on the great American frontier, or piracy on the Indian ocean, those crimes are all perpetrated by criminals, not people with a political agenda.

Might be useful to expand your horizons a bit and start doing a little due dilligence before spouting off with such inanities.

It has LONG been known that the Pirates in Somalia are either Islamic Jihadists themselves or supporters thereto.

See: http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=31458

36 posted on 02/24/2011 10:13:06 AM PST by Conservative Vermont Vet ((One of ONLY 37 Conservatives in the People's Republic of Vermont. Socialists and Progressives All))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: T-Bird45

“Mission-type orders”

Like: “Sweep the seas for England!”


37 posted on 02/24/2011 10:15:11 AM PST by Jim Noble (House GOP: If you can't stand the heat, get out of the kitchen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: lynn4303
"A couple hundred years ago we had problems with pirates. No more pirates."

There have been pirates since there has been commercial maritime activity. Contrary to apparent popular opinion, our "pirate problem" has never gone away. Piracy has existed, and continued to exist LONG after the Barbary Wars, even in those very same waters.

I don't think you realize what the size of the body of water we're talking about is. The pirates operate far beyond literal waters, extending their reach to an area that far surpasses the size of the United States. Our Navy is just not that big.

No one is saying that pirates shouldn't be dealt with harshly, but to opine that we're going to sacrifice the hostages in the name of the greater good, is farcical. Pirates are criminals. There is a role for us federal police agencies, like the FBI hear, especially when there's an active-hostage crisis.

38 posted on 02/24/2011 10:17:47 AM PST by OldDeckHand (So long as we have SEIU, who needs al-Qaeda?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: peeps36

I think the British used a similiar technique against the U-Boats in WWI. They were called Q-Boats. They were freighters with hidden guns that blew away German subs on the surface.


39 posted on 02/24/2011 10:19:49 AM PST by forgotten man (forgotten man)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Conservative Vermont Vet
"It has LONG been known that the Pirates in Somalia are either Islamic Jihadists themselves or supporters thereto."

Oh wow, you read that on blog, no less. I spent 25-years in navy law enforcement. My "horizons" are expanded just fine. Thanks anyways.

I don't care what god the Somali Pirates pray to, just like I don't care what god the Colombian drug lords, or wild west bandits prayed to. They, like the pirates, are engaging in a purely for-profit criminal enterprise.

40 posted on 02/24/2011 10:21:37 AM PST by OldDeckHand (So long as we have SEIU, who needs al-Qaeda?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-90 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson