Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Christine O'Donnell Establishes 'ChristinePAC,' Plans to 'Bring the Battle' to Her Opponents
ABC News ^ | February 8, 2011 | THE NOTE (Gregory Simmons)

Posted on 02/08/2011 5:52:26 PM PST by Moseley

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-44 last
To: Moseley

Gee, I don’t watch TV, sue me. I presented only what I had heard, mention that I don’t necessarily believe the spin and you attack me. There really is no reason for me to research O’Donnell as I could never vote for her, and time is at a premium. A simple link to an article, or link to a written response from her campaign would have been better than spiteful words.


41 posted on 02/09/2011 2:33:59 PM PST by runninglips (government debt = slavery of the masses)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: runninglips

There maybe something there and then again the FEC may well drop any efforts. I don’t know where the investigations stand at this point.

She did raise somewhere around $7 million and spent most of it or so it’s claimed. I’ve not looked at the FEC filings.

However some of the charges seem to center around using some of the money to pay rent/mortgage or whatever on the domicle where she was staying. That is or isn’t permitted under the FEC rules depending upon who you are listening to.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20101229/ap_on_re_us/us_o_donnell_investigation

snip.....
Although O’Donnell’s campaign has denied wrongdoing, she has acknowledged she paid part of her rent at times with campaign money, arguing that her house doubled as a campaign headquarters.

Federal law prohibits candidates from spending campaign money for personal benefit. FEC rules state that this prohibition applies to the use of campaign money for a candidate’s mortgage or rent “even if part of the residence is being used by the campaign,” although O’Donnell’s campaign maintained that it was told otherwise by someone at the agency.

end snip.


42 posted on 02/09/2011 3:05:47 PM PST by deport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: deport

Thanks for the reply, it sounds like a “petty crime” to me. Others do worse, most do similar things.


43 posted on 02/09/2011 4:04:43 PM PST by runninglips (government debt = slavery of the masses)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: deport
Although O’Donnell’s campaign has denied wrongdoing, she has acknowledged she paid part of her rent at times with campaign money, arguing that her house doubled as a campaign headquarters.

That is absolutely FALSE. O'Donnell has DENIED paying ANY part of her rent with campaign money. (I realize, of course, that it is NOT YOUR fault that the news media reports it inaccurately. I am not jumping on you, only informing.)

O'Donnell's campaign has paid for a headquarters, which you can see is a real office environment:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qfzbGVJ2tCE

O'Donnell then paid the campaign, not the other way around, to use part of that location as her LEGAL residence. She actually lives somewhere else, which she does not disclose for privacy.


44 posted on 02/17/2011 7:48:23 AM PST by Moseley (http://www.MeetChristineODonnell.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-44 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson