Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Senator Wyden Asks WTF Is Up With Homeland Security Domain Seizures
TorrentFreak ^ | 2/3/2011 | Ernesto

Posted on 02/03/2011 2:02:33 PM PST by Smogger

Following on from news of the third phase of ‘piracy’ and counterfeit related domain seizures in 7 months, US Senator Ron Wyden has asked the director of Homeland Security’s Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) to clarify some of the most pressing questions. If the domain seizures are to continue, the Obama administration has to be more open about the need for them and the process involved, he argues.

Earlier this week we broke the news that US authorities had started a third round of domain seizures. This time, it turned out that the actions were aimed at sports streaming sites. In total, 10 domain names belonging to 6 websites were handed over to the authorities.

As with previous seizures, the actions of the authorities were met with disbelief by the sites’ owners and their millions of visitors. The owner of Rojadirecta, one of the affected sites, questioned the legitimacy of the seizure since his site has twice been declared legal in Spain. In addition, many further questions were raised.

Today, we learned a little bit more about the justifications for the “Super Bowl Crackdown” after we obtained the affidavit that ICE agent Daniel Brazier sent to the US District Court. However, the request for a seizure warrant is very generic and leaves many questions unanswered.

Luckily, we’re not the only ones who want to find out more about the lack of due process and the need for domain seizures that comply with the DMCA. US Senator Ron Wyden asks the same questions.

In a letter addressed to ICE director John Morton he voiced his concerns, stating that the seizures are “alarmingly unprecedented” and that they could “stifle constitutionally protected speech.” In addition, Senator Wyden asks the following.

— 1. How does ICE and DoJ measure the effectiveness of Operation In our Sites and domain seizures more broadly — how does the government measure the benefits and costs of seizing domain names?

2. Of the nearly 100 domain names seized by the Obama Administration over the last 9 months, how many prosecutions were initiated, how many indictments obtained, and how were the operators of these domain names provided due process?

3. What is the process for selecting a domain name for seizure and, specifically, what criteria are used?

a. Does the Administration make any distinction between domain names that are operated overseas and those that are operated in the U.S.

b. Does the Administration consider whether a domain name operated overseas is in compliance with the domestic law from which the domain name is operated?

c. What standard does the Administration use to ensure that domains are not seized that also facilitate legitimate speech?

d. What standards does ICE use to ensure that it does not seize the domain names of websites the legal status of which could be subject to legitimate debate in a U.S. court of law; how does ICE ensure that seizures target on the true “bad actors?”

4. Does the Administration believe that hyperlinks to domain names that offer downloadable infringing content represent a distribution of infringing content, or do they represent speech?

5. Does the Administration believe that websites that facilitate discussion about where to find infringing content on the Internet represents speech or the distribution of infringed content? What if the discussion on these websites includes hyperlinks to websites that offer downloadable, infringing content?

6. What standard does DoJ expect foreign countries to use when determining whether to seize a domain name controlled in the U.S. for copyright infringement?

7. Did DoJ and ICE take into account the legality of before it seized its domain name? If so, did DoJ and ICE consult with the Department of State or the United States Trade Representative before seizing this site in order to consider how doing so is consistent with U.S. foreign policy and commercial objectives

8. In an affidavit written by Special Agent Andrew Reynolds, he uses his ability to download four specific songs on the domain name as justification for seizure of this domain name. According to press accounts, the songs in question were legally provided to the operator of the domain name for the purpose of distribution. Please explain the Administration’s justification for continued seizure of this domain name and its rationale for not providing this domain name operator, and others, due process.

9. Can you please provide to me a list of all the domain names seized by the Obama Administration since January of 2009 and provide the basis for their seizure?

10. Do ICE and DoJ keep a record of who meets with federal law enforcement about particular domain names? If not, would you consider keeping such a record and making it publicly available, to ensure transparency in government and that Operation in our Sites is not used to create competitive advantages in the marketplace?

TOPICS: Breaking News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: acta; batass; coica; domain; ice; internet; ronwyden; seizure; wyden
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-65 next last
To: Smogger

The three stooges look like geniuses compared to this bunch.

41 posted on 02/03/2011 6:21:37 PM PST by Rome2000 (OBAMA IS A COMMUNIST CRYPTO-MUSLIM)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The Comedian

Great, but the real concern is when it hits the fan, where will Shep get his lipstick?

42 posted on 02/03/2011 6:25:49 PM PST by Rome2000 (OBAMA IS A COMMUNIST CRYPTO-MUSLIM)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Smogger

I’m a bit confused on one point: What bearing does IP enforcement have on homeland security? Are we worried that Al Qaeda is pirating DVDs?

43 posted on 02/03/2011 6:45:19 PM PST by Redcloak (What's your zombie plan?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Smogger

I may not like how they went about it, but I applaud the move to shut down those sites. They were pirating sports and television feeds, other way to put it.

44 posted on 02/03/2011 7:05:19 PM PST by SideoutFred (B.O. really does)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Smogger


45 posted on 02/03/2011 7:09:35 PM PST by Batman11 (Sarah Palin: "Illegal immigrants are called illegal for a reason!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: snowrip

Issa is in the House, not the Senate.

46 posted on 02/03/2011 7:58:19 PM PST by ratsreek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: mojitojoe
Would they allow us to do what they are doing in Egypt?

A free American people don't need no steekin permit to protest our government.

47 posted on 02/03/2011 7:58:41 PM PST by April Lexington (Study the Constitution so you know what they are taking away!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: killermosquito

I think the major league sports leagues are preparing for paid streaming video services over the internet. If I recall correctly, Major League Baseball already has a subscription service to watch any game live for a full season at quite a reasonable price. So I expect that’s where this is going and probably within two years you’ll be able to watch all NFL games with relatively low-quality video on your computer at a low cost on I think they’ll keep the video resolution at a low level so as not to compete directly with HD video on the networks and by subscription from DirecTV.

I think that’s what this is all about: protecting the future revenue of sports leagues from streaming video. But you have to wonder what’s next. As far as I know, sports bars have been picking up satellite broadcasts of major league sports for decades without paying a dime to anyone. Is DHS going to show up at your local sports bar and shut the place down for illegally using satellite dishes to pick up all the games on Sunday? This is starting to go too far. There are enough laws on the federal books to make everyone in America a law-breaker of some kind. DHS has to use sound judgement about which laws really need to be actively enforced.

48 posted on 02/03/2011 8:52:15 PM PST by socialism_stinX (Why did California go bankrupt?...because of unfunded mandates, medicaid, and illegal immigration.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: pallis
This nation won’t be free again until this country rids itself of fascist police organizations that are above the law and the Constitution. To get to there, we will have to rid ourselves of the politicians who keep funding them. Conservative politicians need to get off the federal band wagon, and get back to looking after the liberties of their constituents.

I agree. "Due process" has become only words on a piece of paper. These fascists are running ramshod over our rights and liberties. Now Lieberman and Obama want to be able to shutdown the internet when they deem it necessary just like Mubarak did in Egypt.

49 posted on 02/03/2011 10:00:34 PM PST by apoliticalone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: SideoutFred

More power to them! Here is to hoping they far outnumber the “policing” feds.

50 posted on 02/03/2011 10:25:40 PM PST by Soothesayer9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Smogger

11. Why does ICE and DOJ consider this a more important priority for their time and resources than catching the illegals streaming across the border?

51 posted on 02/03/2011 10:31:41 PM PST by OrangeHoof (Washington, we Texans want a divorce!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Soothesayer9

I happen to be in the TV sports programming business. If they were stealing from your business, I don’t think you would feel the same way.

Stealing is stealing.

52 posted on 02/04/2011 2:24:02 AM PST by SideoutFred (B.O. really does)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Smogger
Good to know they have their priorities in order.

ICE Keeping Us Safe from NFL Feeds

Ice Agents Now NFL Who Dat Police At Super Bowl

ICE Agents Now NFL Trademark Police

53 posted on 02/04/2011 3:21:46 AM PST by OddLane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SideoutFred

Does the NFL have a pay for view site to watch the Super Bowl?

54 posted on 02/04/2011 3:46:21 AM PST by listenhillary (20 years in Reverend Wright's church is all I need to determine the "content of his character")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Smogger

Explain to me how streaming sports video sites are a danger to homeland security?

55 posted on 02/04/2011 5:07:45 AM PST by voicereason (A RINO is just a different shade of Democrat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: voicereason
Not sure, but it probably involves James Harrison.
56 posted on 02/04/2011 5:21:10 AM PST by OddLane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: TigersEye

“We needed another national security agency to protect us from websites that stream sports events?”

I guess copyright infringement = terrorism.
Which is not that far from criticizing economic/monetary policy = terrorism.
Or from subversive speech = terrorism.

57 posted on 02/04/2011 6:12:32 AM PST by sanchmo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Smogger
This is why the Dept. of Homeland Security should never have been created. In the right hands, we (probably) don't have too much to worry about. But, in the wrong hands as it is now, a rogue admin like this one will abuse their power without blinking an eye. I say we scrap every agency or little fiefdom that has been created in the government in the past 10 years and go back to what we had beforehand.
58 posted on 02/04/2011 9:51:41 AM PST by Major Matt Mason (Democrat Motto - "A lie will travel halfway around the world before the truth can put its pants on.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SideoutFred
"TV sports programming business"

A misnomer if there ever was one.

59 posted on 02/04/2011 1:59:21 PM PST by Soothesayer9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: sanchmo

I think you’re right. Meantime 60,000+ real terrorists set up shop throughout the land.

60 posted on 02/04/2011 2:06:17 PM PST by TigersEye (Who crashed the markets on 9/28/08 and why?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-65 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794 is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson