Skip to comments.
Military brass do not applaud Obama’s mention of DADT repeal during SOTU
Daily Caller ^
| 1/26/11
| Matthew Boyle
Posted on 01/26/2011 4:21:33 AM PST by markomalley
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-30 last
To: stayathomemom
Even more interesting, he mentions them after Mooslems......
21
posted on
01/26/2011 6:22:59 AM PST
by
sniper63
(Did you plug the hole in the border yet daddy........)
To: thethirddegree; SECURE AMERICA
So you are all for limited governing and individual liberty, the promotion of freedom and basic inalienable human rights unless, what? That individual is gay?
Perverts? Send them off to do our fiercest fighting?
Shame on you.
22
posted on
01/26/2011 6:27:40 AM PST
by
dinodino
(Mrs. Dinodino)
To: dinodino
Actually it is an appropriate response given the misguided effort to keeping them off the front lines as some are suggesting...due to health concerns, blood, and % of AIDS/Hep rates among sodomites.
While it is reasonable and understandable that soldiers wouldn’t want to be exposed to the risk in battle situations, I think units composed strictly of infected blood carriers on the front line is far more reasonable than keeping them off the front line entirely.
I am completely against healthy straight fathers and potential family men(our countries future) fighting while sick sodomites come home untouched and protected from the battles our healthy young future risk their lives in....
To: markomalley
didnt give Ø any positive reaction either.Most troops don't support the repeal either.
24
posted on
01/26/2011 7:23:37 AM PST
by
Arrowhead1952
(America has two cancers - democrats and RINOS.)
To: Jet Jaguar; NorwegianViking; ExTexasRedhead; HollyB; FromLori; EricTheRed_VocalMinority; ...
25
posted on
01/26/2011 8:06:30 AM PST
by
Nachum
(The complete Obama list at www.nachumlist.com)
To: markomalley
Nobody would or should expect them to promote the sin of Sodomy by applauding it.
26
posted on
01/26/2011 8:17:46 AM PST
by
444Flyer
("The contest for ages has been to rescue liberty from the grasp of executive power." -Daniel Webster)
To: markomalley
They know the damage the repeal of DADT will do, have told him,but will he listen; NO.
27
posted on
01/26/2011 10:04:27 AM PST
by
SandRat
(Duty, Honor, Country! What else needs said?)
To: Manly Warrior
And yes, you are correct in your statement that the military brass in attendance do not display approval or disapproval of any policy, especially military policy.
To: dinodino
I understand your sentiment, but place "shame" where it belongs. The U.S. military has one mission and one mission only : to be the most efficient and effective fighting force on the face of the Earth. When we battle, we win, period. Anything that advances that cause is welcome. Anything that detracts from it is unwelcome. The decision to introduce open homosexuality into the military body is rooted purely in social politics. The Pres__ent has politicized the safety and defense of the nation because a subset of liberals need to "feel good" about themselves --- and the effectiveness and efficiency of the military be damned for it. That kind of selfishness is "shameful". Who else with the need to feel good about themselves should we allow to cripple the fighting force? How about the morbidly obese? They too have special health considerations and require certain special accommodations made for them in order to serve. If the liberals decide the obese need to feel good about themselves and have access to military service, would it be wise for our Pres__ent to welcome them in too? Clearly not. I grant you that a healthy respect for the sanctity of life ought to be encouraged. But I include with that the sanctity of life for those capable servicemen put in harms way with crippled military capabilities covering their flanks? They are worth far more to us than the hurt feelings of minute portion of the citizenry.
29
posted on
01/26/2011 11:28:21 AM PST
by
so_real
( "The Congress of the United States recommends and approves the Holy Bible for use in all schools.")
To: noinfringers2
Someone once said better than I can recollect that to be anything but a liberal when you are young is to have no heart—but to be anything but a conservative when you mature shows you have no brains. I tried to be a good “progressive” Democrat when I first left the Army. They looked more unified and willing to set aside personal opinion for the good of the Party. Then I saw how their rhetoric did not match reality.
These young sculls full of mush will get some experience and will perhaps regret being so blinded by the Obamanation. We
Americans seem to have a habit of trust- and when the enemy gives us back our scrap iron in bombs -then we get back up and set things right.
30
posted on
01/28/2011 5:07:58 AM PST
by
StonyBurk
(ring)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-30 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson