Posted on 01/20/2011 9:30:31 AM PST by brityank
Until accepting a certain percentage of "developmentally disabled" and "economically disadvantaged" students becomes a condition for reimbursement of those vouchers.
And an "approved curriculum."
Vouchers suck. Lame-o idea for cheapskates.
Let the state and the do-gooders in the NEA handle that
.
Obama Administration Targets 'Disparate Impact' of Discipline
Federal officials are getting the word out that addressing racial disparities in school discipline is a high priority, and they plan to use disparate-impact analysis in enforcing school discipline casesa legal course of action that some civil rights lawyers contend was neglected under the administration of President George W. Bush.
Regrettably, students of color are receiving different and harsher disciplinary punishments than whites for the same or similar infractions, and they are disproportionately impacted by zero-tolerance policiesa fact that only serves to exacerbate already deeply entrenched disparities in many communities, Thomas E. Perez, the assistant attorney general for civil rights at the U.S. Department of Justice, recently said at a conference on school discipline and civil rights, according to a transcript of his speech.
And just wait til the federal judges see who is and isn't getting in under these vouchers.
Come on, there hasn't been a right to freedom of association in this country in 40 years and it's ten times worse if you take the king's schilling
Those aren't the conditions yet . Get the private schools hooked on the money and then change the rules.
Just like they hooked the hospitals on Medicare money and then passed a law stating they couldn't refuse anyone emergency room care with no reimbursement provisions.
You sure are trusting of the government's camel nose poking into the tent. How's that worked for us so far?
.
I can picture the lawsuits now. Do you really think the government will allow private schools to turn troublemaking urban blacks away en masse?
But if they accepted the money, they would haev to obey the state in acceptance.
You eliminate tenure and there won't be a single Christian Conservative left in the system. It is unwise to assume a principal is anything other than a leftist, otherwise they don't get their job.
or as they operated in DC .... Scott has brough the former head of the DC school district on board
AND close the Department of Education
.
.
The petitions for the courts are probably already written up and stuffed away in an ACLU filing cabinet, just needing names to fill in the blanks.
I'm sure you meant to say, "not conditions NOW."
Why vouchers? Why not a tax credit?
While I'm sure tax credits wouldn't eliminate the chance of govt meddling down the line, it would be much harder to get away with.
But they soak everyone for the schools now and those that use the schools and roads and such already get a huge tax credit ... it's the Homestead Exemption - one of the most unfair tax exemptions on the books
the people who vote on the tax increases are exempt form the increase by the Homestead Exemption but they are the ones who reap the benefits of the spending
.
There already is, and I pay dearly for it.
.
Thanks again; seems that Charlotte Iserbyt’s article shows us just why we have so many problems convincing conservatives as well as liberals how to fix the problems of our country.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.