Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Michael van der Galien; All
“birthers” who continue to deny that Obama was born in America

This is a lie. We continue to deny that sufficient evidence has been supplied to support the assertion that Barry was born anywhere, let alone in the USA.

And BTW, the upcoming forgery will be brilliant.


Frowning takes 68 muscles.
Smiling takes 6.
Pulling this trigger takes 2.
I'm lazy.

76 posted on 12/28/2010 2:01:27 PM PST by The Comedian (Government: Saving people from freedom since time immemorial.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: The Comedian
ATTEMPTED TO POST THE COMMENT BELOW TO BLOGGER'S SITE WITH NO SUCCESS. DID ANYONE HEAR THE ANTI-BIRTHER SCREEDS ONCE AGAIN SPEWED BY MICHAEL MEDVED AND HUGH HEWITT YESTERDAY? THIS ISSUE COMES DOWN TO A POLITICAL CALCULATION FOR THEM. THIS IS WHY THEY ARE SO VOCIFEROUS IN THEIR RHETORIC. THE FACT THAT GOV. ABERCROMBIE, AN OBOT OF THE HIGHEST ORDER, HAS DECIDED TO AGGRESSIVELY GO DOWN THE ANTI-BIRTHER PATH CONFOUNDS THEIR MACHIAVELLIAN ASSUMPTIONS. AT LEAST FIVE STATES ARE CONSIDERING LEGISLATION WHICH WOULD MAKE IT IMPOSSIBLE FOR OBAMA TO QUALIFY FOR THE 2012 PRESIDENTIAL BALLOT, A FACT NOT LOST ON OBAMA AND HIS MINIONS.

Needless to say, I disagree with you regarding Obama’s constitutional eligibility. Without indulging in rancor and invective that marked both Michael Medved’s (are you a ‘MedHead?’) and Hugh Hewitt's radio shows yesterday in their ad hominem attacks on ‘birthers,’ I would posit the following questions and welcome your response:
1) What is the status of the Posey bill (H.R. 1503) that would require future presidential candidates in 2012 and beyond to provide a copy of their original birth certificate?

2) Do you anticipate House hearings on the Lakin court martial? I believe the Republican-controlled House could achieve a political coup by subpoenaing Lakin (shackles, jumpsuit and all) who is currently incarcerated in Ft. Leavenworth. Would such testimony damage or enhance Republican electoral prospects in 2012 and beyond?

3) Bills have been introduced in several state legislatures that would require presidential candidates to document that they were born in the United States, as well as the legal status of their parents thus meeting the ‘natural born’ requirement under Article II, Section 1, Clause 5. (A proxy document such as the vaunted ‘certification of live birth’ or a classified ad in a local newspaper won't cut it.) Such legislation passed the Arizona House in April but was not taken up by the Senate in time. Do you think that these pending bills will gain traction in the coming months? If so, would not Mr. Obama be forced to stand down for re-election in 2012 because his purported ‘certification of live birth’ will have been deemed inadequate?
Gov. Abercrombie's birther gambit is in concert with Obama and his inner circle. They know that only a handful of states denying Obama a place on their presidential ballots would end his presidency. Abercrombie mistakenly thinks that he has sufficient powers of persuasion to avert such a political train wreck. I am less concerned about Abercrombie and more concerned about ‘conservatives’ like you and Medved who trash the constitution. Unless and until the U.S. Supreme Court speaks definitively and decisively on what ‘natural born’ means, I wll never consider Obama to be a legitimate president. But as your ideological mentor David Horowitz wrote in December 2008, that horse has left the barn. Perhaps what the American people have to look forward to is an Obama presidential library at which his vital, academic and other personal records might finally see the light of day. I'm not holding my breath!

77 posted on 12/28/2010 2:27:12 PM PST by jdoug666 (KENYAN OBAMA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson