Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

GOP lawmakers threaten to repeal Net neutrality
www.politico.com ^ | 12-21-2010 | By TONY ROMM

Posted on 12/21/2010 3:42:42 PM PST by NoLibZone

Less than an hour after the Federal Communications Commission approved net neutrality rules, Republican lawmakers began staking their claim in the next potential leg of the debate: repeal.

The first calls to roll back the FCC's new net neutrality order came Tuesday from the House's most senior Republicans: House GOP Leader John Boehner of Ohio and Whip Eric Cantor of Virginia, as well as the incoming leaders of the chamber's top tech and telecom committees.

The members each threatened to limit the agency's funds or restrict its jurisdiction in the aftermath of the FCC’s vote, with Boehner proclaiming the "new House majority will work to reverse this unnecessary and harmful federal government power grab next year."

Rep. Fred Upton (R-Mich.), soon-to-be chair of the House Energy and Commerce Committee, later elaborated to reporters Tuesday afternoon that he plans to bring all five commissioners before the panel to discuss net neutrality at "the first hearing out of the box" next year. He even signaled the possibility that Republicans may pursue repeal through the Congressional Review Act — an avenue that allows members to reject agency rules without threat of filibuster, provided they can secure a majority support against net neutrality.

Joining Upton's calls for strict scrutiny and eventual repeal were Reps. Greg Walden (R-Ore.), Lee Terry (R-Neb.) and Marsha Blackburn (R-Tenn.). Walden, who will soon lead the House's top tech subcommittee, stressed the need to rebuff any FCC "power grab that'd allow the commission to regulate" other areas of broadband. Blackburn also floated the possibility of blocking agency funds for use on net neutrality, adding: "You will see activism on each of these levels."

Congressional furor follows Tuesday’s 3-2, party-line vote on Genachowski's plan to adopt basic net neutrality protections for broadband networks. The order will prohibit Internet service providers such as AT&T, Verizon and Comcast from blocking access to lawful content and websites. It also prohibits traditional wired broadband providers from unreasonably discriminating against any traffic, though there will be no similar rule in place for wireless providers.

Following the vote, the chairman said he was ready to take on any criticism.

"We adopted today a strong and balanced order that has widespread support and that focuses on the importance of Internet freedom," he said. "It's a strong and balanced order and I look forward to speaking about it with anyone who is interested.”

Some Democrats hail the FCC's vote on Tuesday as the next step in ensuring that high-speed Internet networks remain open. Supporters included Sens. Jay Rockefeller of West Virginia, Mark Warner of Virgnia, Rep. Ed Markey of Massachusetts and Doris Matsui of California.

President Barack Obama also backed the FCC, saying the decision is “an important component of our overall strategy to advance American innovation, economic growth and job creation.”

But those statements of approval may not be enough to stave off critics already interested in undoing Genachowski's work as early as next month.

Other Republican leaders also sounded off Tuesday against the FCC's net neutrality order — including Senate Republican Leader Mitch McConnell of Kentucky, who first signaled during a floor speech that he and others in his party would "push back against new rules and regulations." Sen. Kay Bailey Hutchison (R-Texas), ranking member on her chamber's Commerce Committee, signaled she would revive her efforts to derail the FCC's latest move.

Terry, meanwhile, told POLITICO the vote "certainly sets our agenda for the Energy and Commerce Committee," as he and others, including Upton, plan to discuss their next steps very soon.

"The first thing we'll do is call Julius up and have him explain himself, we need to study the proposal, and then we'll draft legislation to undo it," he said in an interview.

"We'll use everything available to us — so yes, we'll use Appropriations, we'll use the legislative process," he continued. "This is really a war against Congress. ... this is a power grab by an agency almost to unheard of levels. So we have a constitutional obligation to fight this order to the death."

Rep. Cliff Stearns (R-Fla.), who will lead the Energy and Commerce oversight subcommittee, also joined his GOP colleagues in vowing to heavily scrutinize the agency if it ever moved forward with Genachowski's proposal.

"I will exercise strong oversight on the FCC on this and other issues," Stearns said in a statement Tuesday.

"Also, working with Chairman Walden, we will outline that Internet regulation is out of the FCC's jurisdiction and that regulation will hamper economic growth and job creation," he added, noting he too would pursue a resolution of disapproval next year.

Read more: http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1210/46685.html#ixzz18n9TsoOU

Read more: http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1210/46685.html#ixzz18n9KIx39


TOPICS: Breaking News; Constitution/Conservatism
KEYWORDS: 0bamacare; 0bonazism; 0pansyqueer; 0panzinomics; 111th; bhofcc; dems4mediacontrol; fairnessdoctrine; fcc; freepress; google; internet; netneutrality; soros; spookydude; telecom
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-139 next last

1 posted on 12/21/2010 3:42:51 PM PST by NoLibZone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: NoLibZone
The members each threatened to limit the agency's funds or restrict its jurisdiction in the aftermath of the FCC’s vote,...

Skinning a cat with attitude!

2 posted on 12/21/2010 3:45:24 PM PST by EGPWS (Trust in God, question everyone else)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NoLibZone
"Less than an hour after the Federal Communications Commission approved net neutrality rules..."

Good on them.

3 posted on 12/21/2010 3:45:33 PM PST by NoLibZone (Homosexuals oppose diversity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NoLibZone

Threaten?

Like it’s a bad thing?


4 posted on 12/21/2010 3:45:57 PM PST by hattend (The meaning of the 2010 election was rebuke, reject, and repeal. - Sarah Palin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NoLibZone

C’mon now. Where’s all the GOP haters? Cmon? Where’s the “spineless” comments?


5 posted on 12/21/2010 3:46:14 PM PST by sam_paine (X .................................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NoLibZone
President Barack Obama also backed the FCC, saying the decision is “an important component of our overall strategy

Nuff said......

6 posted on 12/21/2010 3:48:31 PM PST by LaineyDee (Don't mess with Texas wimmen!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NoLibZone

They better!!!!


7 posted on 12/21/2010 3:49:35 PM PST by SandRat (Duty, Honor, Country! What else needs said?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sam_paine

GOP “threatens” is like Obama sending a stern letter.
I’ll believe a repeal when I see it.
Meanwhile,
Countdown to throwing out the spineless and RINOs in 2012.


8 posted on 12/21/2010 3:50:18 PM PST by Aroostook25
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: sam_paine

It hasn’t gotten tot he Senate yet. Senate GOP is where spineless resides.


9 posted on 12/21/2010 3:51:06 PM PST by jospehm20
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: NoLibZone
I am confused. Will someone please enlighten me why it is bad to force such carriers as Comcast to not censor the content of web sites they carry, i.e., refuse to carry the web sites? I can understand the furor over porn on the Internet but to ban some web site because of its political views or ethnic makeup or religious views or, etc., etc. does not make sense to me.

I can also understand shutting down web sites that steal property such as songs and stories. But much beyond that seems to be to be in realm of free speech and should not be discriminated against.

Am I reading the comments all wrong?

Thank you

10 posted on 12/21/2010 3:51:09 PM PST by ProudFossil
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sam_paine
C’mon now. Where’s all the GOP haters? Cmon? Where’s the “spineless” comments?

Talk is cheap. I'll reserve judgement until they actually do something concrete.

11 posted on 12/21/2010 3:51:33 PM PST by Cementjungle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: NoLibZone

They can threaten all they want. Until both houses of congress pass it, and 0bama signs it, or doesn’t and it becomes law - it don’t mean shinola.


12 posted on 12/21/2010 3:51:34 PM PST by Keith in Iowa (FR Class of 1998 | TV News is an oxymoron. | MSNBC = Moonbats Spouting Nothing But Crap.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NoLibZone
President Barack Obama also backed the FCC, saying the decision is “an important component of our overall strategy to advance American innovation, economic growth and job creation.”

???

Restrict freedom and create jobs...yeah that will work.

These people have no shame.

13 posted on 12/21/2010 3:51:34 PM PST by EGPWS (Trust in God, question everyone else)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sam_paine

There’s much evidence in the past to support those comments.

Let’s see if this talk translates to completed action.


14 posted on 12/21/2010 3:52:29 PM PST by F15Eagle (1 John 5:4-5, 4:15, 5:13; John 3:17-18, 6:69, 11:25, 14:6, 20:31; Rom10:8-11; 1 Tim 2:5; Titus 3:4-5)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: NoLibZone

Can you explain why this is a good thing? I don’t really want Comcast and AT&T deciding what sites I can visit or what I can download. Isn’t net neutrality what we have now?


15 posted on 12/21/2010 3:54:32 PM PST by Ha Ha Thats Very Logical
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: NoLibZone

Rep. Greg Walden (R-Ore.)

FINALLY! God has smiled upon Oregon, and SENSE appears from this state I live in!

I need to go play the lottery.


16 posted on 12/21/2010 3:54:51 PM PST by Danae (Anail nathrach, orth' bhais's bethad, do chel denmha)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibLieSlayer

Well, Boehner said he is going to do something about this.

Is it all hat and no cattle? You be the judge. I just don’t know.

The fact that they are GOP doesn’t make me feel a whole lot better.

I want actions that result in severe action, not just talk.


17 posted on 12/21/2010 3:55:44 PM PST by dforest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ProudFossil

Because it is yet another industry the government thinks it has the right to control.

No, it doesn’t have the right.


18 posted on 12/21/2010 3:56:28 PM PST by Danae (Anail nathrach, orth' bhais's bethad, do chel denmha)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: NoLibZone

GOP lawmakers threaten to repeal Net neutrality”

I pray that they repeal this one. I could not believe my ears this morning listening to the radio. Last time govt. got involved in anything it was just a mess.


19 posted on 12/21/2010 3:57:34 PM PST by Ancient Drive (DRINK COFFEE! - Do Stupid Things Faster with More Energy!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ProudFossil
Will someone please enlighten me why it is bad to force such carriers as Comcast to not censor the content of web sites they carry, i.e., refuse to carry the web sites?

I am still fence-sitting too. I don't know which I would trust less -- the FCC or the Cable company. I do know the cable company throttles internet speed, and their claims to deliver certain speeds are preferenced with the coniditonal, "up to XYZ Mbps".


20 posted on 12/21/2010 3:58:03 PM PST by TomGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: NoLibZone
There is no threatening. Do it!
21 posted on 12/21/2010 3:58:14 PM PST by Two Thirds Vote Aye (I was saying 'I hope he fails' before Rush was.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NoLibZone

They’ll do no such thing. They’ll pass some irrelevant crap that they’ll claim fixes the problem when the way to really fix the problem is stop funding the FCC until they yell mercy.


22 posted on 12/21/2010 3:59:48 PM PST by tobyhill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NoLibZone

One more thing, how do you repeal something that was never made a law?

We ain’t stupid.


23 posted on 12/21/2010 4:00:03 PM PST by dforest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ProudFossil

I’ve thought about this issue and I think that it basically boils down to who do you fear less: ISP’s or the government?

I don’t fully trust ISP’s but I trust them more than I trust the government.


24 posted on 12/21/2010 4:00:32 PM PST by Weird Tolkienish Figure
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Ha Ha Thats Very Logical; ProudFossil

To say that ‘net neutrality’ is a good thing is to postulate that government wants more free speech and that free enterprise is trying to squelch speech.

All of recorded history does not support that postulate


25 posted on 12/21/2010 4:00:55 PM PST by abb ("What ISN'T in the news is often more important than what IS." Ed Biersmith, 1942 -)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: NoLibZone

Yea, there is a backbone in the Republican Party! Good for them and the American people want to see A LOT more of this next year. Drag those power hungry agency bureaucrats / tyrants before Congress and slash their budgets so they can’t do as much damage.


26 posted on 12/21/2010 4:01:12 PM PST by Reagan is King
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NoLibZone

One more thing, how do you repeal something that was never made a law? I would suggest arresting and taking those who participate in defying the Constitution to be tried and made to pay a price.


27 posted on 12/21/2010 4:02:33 PM PST by dforest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EGPWS

Using attitude to skin the cat?
Skinning a cat that has attitude?
IMHO the cat should be fed to a dog with attitude.


28 posted on 12/21/2010 4:04:39 PM PST by HiTech RedNeck (I am in America but not of America (per bible: am in the world but not of it))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: jospehm20
It hasn’t gotten to the Senate yet. Senate GOP is where spineless resides.

Within 5 minutes after the ruling was announced I fired off faxes to Snowe and Collins asking them what actions they were going to support to undo this. If I ever get an answer I'm sure it will be nonsensical mush.

29 posted on 12/21/2010 4:05:17 PM PST by NewHampshireDuo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Two Thirds Vote Aye
My guess is it will be like their threats of filibusters...then they never do it.
30 posted on 12/21/2010 4:05:50 PM PST by WOBBLY BOB ( "I don't want the majority if we don't stand for something"- Jim Demint)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: NoLibZone

YAY!

GETTING SOME BACKBONE!!!


31 posted on 12/21/2010 4:05:57 PM PST by Infidel Heather (In God I trust, not the Government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Weird Tolkienish Figure
It shouldn't be a matter of trusting ISPs, but the government has certainly shown they'e not to be trusted.

If ISPs are free of government management controls, ISPs will be free to provide whatever it is the customer wants. If people don't like throttling, or whatever fad comes around next year, so long as customers can go to a provider who'll give 'em what they want and are willing to pay for, that'll be better, and spells F R E E D O M!

HF

32 posted on 12/21/2010 4:06:07 PM PST by holden
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: NoLibZone

“Good on them.”

Some of them heard us after the last election.


33 posted on 12/21/2010 4:07:17 PM PST by Sun (Pray that God sends us good leaders. Please say a prayer now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: NoLibZone
The members each threatened to limit the agency's funds

Cut those funds to the bone and make them reverse this decision.

34 posted on 12/21/2010 4:10:21 PM PST by jazusamo (His [Obama's] political base---the young, the left and the thoughtless: Thomas Sowell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NoLibZone
The members each threatened to limit the agency's funds or restrict its jurisdiction in the aftermath of the FCC’s vote, with Boehner proclaiming the "new House majority will work to reverse this unnecessary and harmful federal government power grab next year."

Sounds great, but the GOP is always great with the tough talk. Let's see what happens when they get control of the House and media attention is onto the next story. My prediction is they'll do nothing and hope the public forgets.

35 posted on 12/21/2010 4:10:55 PM PST by YankeeReb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NoLibZone

Repeal everything leftist, asap! Even better.


36 posted on 12/21/2010 4:11:52 PM PST by johnthebaptistmoore (If leftist legislation that's already in place really can't be ended by non-leftists, then what?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NoLibZone

I won’t hold my breath.


37 posted on 12/21/2010 4:12:21 PM PST by Professional Engineer (Conservative States of America has a nice ring to it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NoLibZone
defund and do away with the FCC.

What can happen?

People will start using MF'er MORE than now ?

38 posted on 12/21/2010 4:12:32 PM PST by knarf (Who's Holi ? - Christ I know, you obviously don't - let me tell you about him - Romans 10:13)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TomGuy
I am still fence-sitting too. I don't know which I would trust less -- the FCC or the Cable company.

1. Are you aware of any circumstance in which a common carrier has abused their position in this regard? I'm not. The FCC is proposing a solution for which there is no problem.

2. Are you aware that a federal judge has already decided against the FCC having any authority to undertake this step? Yet, they are doing it anyway. What does that suggest?

3. Nonetheless, in ostensibly blocking the power of the common carriers to conduct censorship, the FCC has accrued the power for itself. Why would they want that, do you suppose?

Hugo Chavez has only talked about taking this action in Venezuela. The FCC just beat him to it.

This. Is. A. Power. Grab.

Nothing less.

39 posted on 12/21/2010 4:17:46 PM PST by okie01 (THE MAINSTREAM MEDIA: Ignorance on Parade)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Keith in Iowa

It is not a law, it is a ruling by the FCC.


40 posted on 12/21/2010 4:18:31 PM PST by Red_Devil 232 (VietVet - USMC All Ready On The Right? All Ready On The Left? All Ready On The Firing Line!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: sam_paine
C’mon now. Where’s all the GOP haters? Cmon? Where’s the “spineless” comments?

Don't celebrate yet, let them do it first :)
41 posted on 12/21/2010 4:23:00 PM PST by battousai (Conservatives are racist? YES, I hate stupid white liberals.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: NoLibZone

Also I love how Politico tries to white was this power grab as a good thing just trying to keep the interwebs open for everyone, and how they only quote republicans as being against it. Yet the courts and the current congress have overwhelmingly ruled against it.


42 posted on 12/21/2010 4:24:39 PM PST by battousai (Conservatives are racist? YES, I hate stupid white liberals.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NoLibZone

Sure, just as the GOP rallied together and stopped the START treaty!

/sarc


43 posted on 12/21/2010 4:26:12 PM PST by lazypadawan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NoLibZone

Sounds like someone has started taking their “Low T” pills!

Go get’em! And let’s start with a zero-based budget for FCC, make them justify everything they’re doing and I’ll bet you could cut the size of that agency to a fraction of what it is and still deliver the services, such as spectrum licensing and enforcement that people see as necessary and worth paying for. Cut the rest.


44 posted on 12/21/2010 4:26:35 PM PST by bigbob (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NoLibZone

I can already see 2012 dem election adds saying something like: GOP supports porn.. GOP doesn’t protect our kids.. I think it’s a setup on these low rent terms.


45 posted on 12/21/2010 4:27:02 PM PST by Track9 (Make War!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

“Boehner Says FCC’s Internet Regulation Would Kill Jobs, Undermine Economy
Tuesday, December 21, 2010
By Melanie Hunter-Omar

snip

“Today’s action by the FCC will hurt our economy, stifle private-sector job creation, and undermine the entrepreneurship and innovation of Internet-related American employers,” Boehner said in a statement.

The FCC voted 3-2 for the new rules, known as “net neutrality,”
snip
“The American people are asking ‘Where are the jobs?’ They aren’t asking for yet another government takeover that imposes more job-killing federal regulations and puts bureaucrats in charge of the Internet,” Boehner added.

Boehner pledged that the House would work to reverse the FCC’s action.

“Federal bureaucrats should not be in the business of regulating the Internet, and the new House majority will work to reverse this unnecessary and harmful federal government power grab next year.”

more http://www.cnsnews.com/news/article/boehner-says-fcc-s-internet-regulation-w


46 posted on 12/21/2010 4:27:22 PM PST by Sun (Pray that God sends us good leaders. Please say a prayer now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Red_Devil 232

>>>It is not a law, it is a ruling by the FCC.

Duh. I know that. Congress can pass legislation removing the FCC’s jurisdiction, they can de-fund... and they can talk out their collective arse until their all blue in the face - results matter.


47 posted on 12/21/2010 4:30:40 PM PST by Keith in Iowa (FR Class of 1998 | TV News is an oxymoron. | MSNBC = Moonbats Spouting Nothing But Crap.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: sam_paine

C’mon now. Where’s all the GOP haters? Cmon? Where’s the “spineless” comments?


Definitely not “being secured at the border”....though, probally being groped by a TSA agent.


48 posted on 12/21/2010 4:32:50 PM PST by UCFRoadWarrior (Whenever something is "Global"...it means its bad for America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: ProudFossil

This is a power grab which the left hopes to use to shut down conservative talk radio and web sites like Free Republic. Remember...the left doesn’t believe in free speech...they are fascist/commies...pure and simple. They are building a structure here to use to shut down opposition. Google it or visit Mark Levin’s site.


49 posted on 12/21/2010 4:33:40 PM PST by penelopesire (Let The Congressional Hearings Begin!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: NoLibZone

Sadly...this is somewhat of an empty threat from the Republicans. Not all Pubbies mind you, but until the leadership adopts a more conservative attitude, they will just be a different shade of Democrat.


50 posted on 12/21/2010 4:37:48 PM PST by voicereason (I Don't Need SEX...I Get Screwed By Democrats Everyday!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-139 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson