Skip to comments.
No Labels: Liberalism Without Labels
Human Events ^
| 12/21/2010
| Tony Lee
Posted on 12/21/2010 6:51:57 AM PST by Voice of Reason88
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-32 next last
Its always a clear indication of a bankrupt ideology when it has to periodically change its labeling to fool people into supporting the same dumb ideas.
Now the fools on the Left are trying the No Labels Label gambit. Thankfully people are beginning to wake up to the scams from the Left and are rejecting them.
BTW, OPPRESSIVE is the best term to describe the authoritarian control freaks on the Left.
This instead of the misleading label Progressive they have applied to themselves. Not only implies that if you resist their agenda that you are against Progress {whatever the heck that means} but the definition of the word is so vague it could mean almost anything.
To: Voice of Reason88
2
posted on
12/21/2010 6:53:49 AM PST
by
reg45
To: Voice of Reason88
The commie label is beginning to stick.
Merry Christmas
3
posted on
12/21/2010 6:54:03 AM PST
by
bray
(Sarah Palin will destroy the Repub Party, hopefully!)
To: Voice of Reason88
Azzhole would be an appropriate label for anyone on the left.
4
posted on
12/21/2010 6:54:11 AM PST
by
maddog55
(OBAMA, You can't fix stupid...)
To: Voice of Reason88
The only people that avoid labels are those with something to hide. For all that McCarthy is blamed for, he understood this, and demanded that those with interests contrary to the country be dragged out into the light, kicking and screaming.
5
posted on
12/21/2010 6:55:59 AM PST
by
arderkrag
(Georgia is God's Country.)
To: Voice of Reason88
It's almost funny how the Left is preoccupied with appearances. It's Orwellian. They're "Liberals" (which, of course, is the opposite of what they are). No, now they're "Progressives." Now they are "No Labels."
As Rush Limbaugh observes: They can't be honest about who they are and what they stand for.
6
posted on
12/21/2010 6:56:25 AM PST
by
Savage Beast
("You can, in fact must, shout 'fire' in a crowded theatre. It just has to be the truth." J. Goldberg)
To: Voice of Reason88
Pedophiles & crack-whores don’t like labels either.
7
posted on
12/21/2010 6:56:32 AM PST
by
laotzu
To: Voice of Reason88
Never happen we know who they are and how they vote.
8
posted on
12/21/2010 6:57:52 AM PST
by
Rappini
("Pro deo et Patria.)
To: Voice of Reason88
Kinda like a Romulan or Klingon cloaking device.
9
posted on
12/21/2010 6:58:01 AM PST
by
Jack Hydrazine
(It's the end of the world as we know it and I feel fine!)
To: Voice of Reason88
I think everyone understands the left’s need to constantly re-label.
Labels, including those they adopt for themselves, eventually come to the point where they convey useful information about the ideology they are attached to.
That leftist ideology is abhorrent to the majority of people, to decent people who haven’t had their consciences seared.
10
posted on
12/21/2010 6:58:05 AM PST
by
MrB
(The difference between a (de)humanist and a Satanist is that the latter knows who he's working for.)
To: Voice of Reason88
A turd by any other name would stink as bad....................
11
posted on
12/21/2010 6:59:15 AM PST
by
Red Badger
(Whenever these vermin call you an “idiot”, you can be sure that you are doing to something right.)
To: bray; reg45
Commie and Socialist effectively mean the same thing.
Merry Christmas to you too.
12
posted on
12/21/2010 6:59:16 AM PST
by
Voice of Reason88
(One man with a gun can control 100 without one-Vladimir Lenin (The Statist view on guns))
To: Voice of Reason88
Very simply,the left are a virus.
Their label ‘names’ mutate but ultimately,they leave a path of destruction wherever they may roam.
To: Savage Beast
Slightly OT, but wouldnt big brother (or Big Bro) have loved the new e-readers like the kindle what better way to send something down the memory hole than simply change it on the fly.
14
posted on
12/21/2010 7:03:34 AM PST
by
Voice of Reason88
(One man with a gun can control 100 without one-Vladimir Lenin (The Statist view on guns))
To: MrB
I really hope thats true for the countrys sake.
15
posted on
12/21/2010 7:06:08 AM PST
by
Voice of Reason88
(One man with a gun can control 100 without one-Vladimir Lenin (The Statist view on guns))
To: Voice of Reason88
Ok, “Crypto Commie” then.
16
posted on
12/21/2010 7:07:01 AM PST
by
reg45
To: reg45
17
posted on
12/21/2010 7:11:25 AM PST
by
Voice of Reason88
(One man with a gun can control 100 without one-Vladimir Lenin (The Statist view on guns))
To: Voice of Reason88
Shitte stinks no matter what you call it!
18
posted on
12/21/2010 7:11:27 AM PST
by
devistate one four
( jihad is a 2 way street! Kimber CDP II .45 OOHRAH! TET68)
To: Voice of Reason88
“The party formerly known as Socialist” (tip o’ the hat to Prince)
19
posted on
12/21/2010 7:14:02 AM PST
by
jdsteel
(CONGRESS: I like the way the words "Palin for President" drive socialists absolutely crazy.)
To: Voice of Reason88
They figure it worked for ACORN.
20
posted on
12/21/2010 7:20:01 AM PST
by
Iron Munro
("Damn it, Jim! I'm a doctor not a race relations Czar in the Obama administration.")
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-32 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson