Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Facing Closure, U.S.'s Largest Sleeping Bag Maker Seeks Relief From Free Trade Loophole
FOX News ^ | December 18, 2010 | Stephen Clark

Posted on 12/19/2010 6:38:36 PM PST by 1rudeboy

The country's largest manufacturer of sleeping bags says new competition from Bangladesh could force it out of business if the U.S. does not level the playing field.

Exxel Outdoors Inc., which employs nearly 70 workers in its Alabama factory and makes about 2 million sleeping bags per year, has been pressing the Obama administration to lift an exemption that lets Bangladesh import sleeping bags into the country without paying a 9 percent tariff.

"You can't leave an American manufacturer at a competitive disadvantage with a foreign worker," Harry Kazazian, chief executive of the company, told FoxNews.com.

But that's apparently what the Obama administration has done, turning down the company's request in an initial ruling and forcing Exxel to submit another request.

The office of the U.S. Trade Representative, which is reviewing Exxel's request, told FoxNews.com that its review will conclude in the spring and that President Obama would have to sign off on any changes to the list of duty-free products – changes that would go into effect before July 1.

"We take Exxel's concerns seriously," the office said in a statement.

Exxel is also seeking help from Congress.

Sen. Jeff Sessions, R-Ala., has tried to slap a tariff on Bangladesh sleeping bags but he has been unable to sway his fellow lawmakers to change the U.S. Generalized System of Preferences, or GSP, which determines which products third-world countries can import duty free.

(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events; US: Alabama
KEYWORDS: 111th; camping; manufacturing; nafta
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 181 next last
To: pnh102
Just something else the Demo-wits are guilty of. NAFTA, Obama, Reid, Pelosi, health care reform....etc, etc, etc. It goes on and on and on. Why don't we just substitute Obama with Putin. At least Putin has a set of balls and uses them to take care of his country.
21 posted on 12/19/2010 6:55:32 PM PST by Nitehawk0325 (I have the right to remain silent, but I lack the ability...........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: 1rudeboy

It’s easy for American companies to compete with Bangladesh labor. Just hire cheap illegals from Mexico to replace higher-wage Americans. Oh, wait...


22 posted on 12/19/2010 6:55:52 PM PST by Bernard Marx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dragnet2

This is not a thread about the U.S. government spending too much money. It is a thread about trade. Government spending threads pop up now and then, you should keep an eye out for one.


23 posted on 12/19/2010 6:57:19 PM PST by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: dragnet2

He was a little crazy, but Ross Perot was right about the inequities of “fair” trading with third world economies. Eighteen years later, we are still experiencing that sucking sound. We manufacture virtually nothing any more and Americans soon will not be able to afford even the crap made in commie countries because they are jobless.


24 posted on 12/19/2010 6:58:19 PM PST by Comparative Advantage
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: 1rudeboy

Well, this problem might be correcting itself, at least to some small degree. Garment workers in Bangladesh have been protesting in an attempt to win increases in their minimum wage from $24.00 per month to $72.00 per month. Of course, the employers consider that figure highly unreasonable and say than can’t increase wages beyond $30.00 per month.

http://www.just-style.com/analysis/caution-is-key-when-buying-from-bangladesh_id108126.aspx


25 posted on 12/19/2010 6:58:27 PM PST by Will88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

Bangladesh is not a member of NAFTA.


26 posted on 12/19/2010 6:58:33 PM PST by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 1rudeboy

If there’s a legitimate grievance, it’s up to his Administration to petition the WTO that this company is dumping bags. If that’s the case we can impose tariffs.


27 posted on 12/19/2010 7:04:13 PM PST by rbosque (12 year Freeper!!! Combat Economist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 1rudeboy

Obama isn’t interested in saving American businesses or jobs.
Especially in red states.

Anyway - they only employ 70 workers.

Michelle Obama has more people than that waiting on her and tending her garden.

/sarcasm/


28 posted on 12/19/2010 7:04:17 PM PST by Iron Munro ("Only criminals, dictators and democrats fear armed citizens.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cringing Negativism Network

It’s not free trade. It’s Globalist crony crapitalism.


29 posted on 12/19/2010 7:05:21 PM PST by little jeremiah (Courage is not simply one of virtues, but the form of every virtue at the testing point.CSLewis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: 1rudeboy

Free trade is great as long as it’s somebody else’s job. Cheap shirts and jeans at Target, hey, I’ve bought those. One by one, the companies keep sending our jobs overseas, because its pays for each company and its shareholders. Then you add it all up and you get a recession that not one bank or manufacturer is responsible for, and, of course, the politicians are never responsible for anything. 10% unemployment (20% effective), and I don’t shop at Target anymore.


30 posted on 12/19/2010 7:06:11 PM PST by Revolting cat! (Let us prey!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dragnet2
Tens of millions of Americans are out of work, the U.S. debt has reached 14 trillion and our economy is sliding into the abyss...

Lol, totally true, but the resident pretend free traders are either unable, or unwilling to find any connection whatsoever between the increased government spending on programs for the poor and low wage earners (which contribute to the US budget deficit), and the export and outsourcing of US jobs, and the trade deficit.

31 posted on 12/19/2010 7:06:20 PM PST by Will88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: rbosque
The U.S. government can use a number of different WTO-approved mechanisms to reduce or block imports from another country. If it finds that a country has been selling goods at “less than fair value,” it can pursue a dumping investigation. If it finds that a country has been illicitly subsidizing its exports, it can take up a countervailing duty case. Those are the two most common approaches, and each involves a two-stage investigation. First, the U.S. International Trade Commission (USITC) determines whether the domestic industry has been injured. Second, the Commerce Department assesses the extent of the exporting country’s violation—the dumping margin or the size of the subsidy. In the end, tariffs may be applied.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2644863/posts.


32 posted on 12/19/2010 7:08:53 PM PST by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: 1rudeboy

I camp out a lot, never heard of them... what do they make?


33 posted on 12/19/2010 7:09:12 PM PST by JWinNC (www.anailinhisplace.net)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Will88

Advisor: Mr. President, the People have no bread.

Obama: Then let them eat cake.


34 posted on 12/19/2010 7:11:27 PM PST by OldArmy52 (Obama & the "Dem Party" have proved America is ready for Fascism/Socialism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: little jeremiah
It’s not free trade. It’s Globalist crony crapitalism.

I decided in advance only to comment on the most egregious examples of failing to read the article, because I correctly guessed that many would not. The reason Exxel is getting screwed is because some politicians got together and tried to boost some poor countries. So it's not "crony capitalism" at all, but rather "good intentions run amok." The government is quite good at it.

35 posted on 12/19/2010 7:11:58 PM PST by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: 1rudeboy

If they really employ only 70 workers and make 2 million a year, there is only .07 of an hour of labor in each bag. It would seem like labor costs would not not be a big problem.


36 posted on 12/19/2010 7:12:12 PM PST by proxy_user
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 1rudeboy

The gummint has been very good fighting monopolies, regulating Wall Street, banks, even if it is always behind the curve (Madoff could’ve been caught 10 years earlier.) But it has done nothing about the export of U.S. jobs, the outsourcing, not a fogging thing. I can’t imagine any other country tolerating such a situation. Do the Germans, the French outsource their jobs to India? Yeah, you bet, globalist Bush’s and Bush’s fault!


37 posted on 12/19/2010 7:13:32 PM PST by Revolting cat! (Let us prey!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Will88
Lol, totally true, but the resident pretend free traders are either unable, or unwilling to find any connection whatsoever between the increased government spending on programs for the poor and low wage earners (which contribute to the US budget deficit), and the export and outsourcing of US jobs, and the trade deficit.

Much like the resident blowhard protectionists don't just come clean and admit that they want Uncle Sugar to run every aspect of their lives in exchange for a steady paycheck.

38 posted on 12/19/2010 7:14:27 PM PST by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: 1rudeboy
Much like the resident blowhard protectionists don't just come clean and admit that they want Uncle Sugar to run every aspect of their lives in exchange for a steady paycheck.

Lol, a typical, inane non-answer.

39 posted on 12/19/2010 7:16:46 PM PST by Will88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Will88

And you react precisely like a woman. Need a hug? Would you feel better if the government ran health care?


40 posted on 12/19/2010 7:18:19 PM PST by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 181 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson