Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

I'll venture a guess the accident rate for in-your-face homosexuals in the military will high.
1 posted on 12/18/2010 3:11:57 PM PST by jazusamo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-59 last
To: jazusamo

just what an army in combat needs to be dealing with.

This is beyond ignorant...it is grossly immoral.


83 posted on 12/18/2010 4:29:13 PM PST by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain & proud of it: Truly Supporting the Troops means praying for their Victory!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jazusamo
The working group’s Nov. 30 report—“Report of the Comprehensive Review of the Issues Associated with a Repeal of ‘Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell’”--concluded that permitting men to use separate showers, bathrooms and bunking facilities from women of the opposite gender would “stigmatize” the women and be “reminiscent of ‘separate but equal’ facilities for blacks prior to the 1960s.” Just replaced 4 words, and it makes just as much sense. But oddly, if you tried to argue this, these people would certainly tell you that forcing women to shower with the men would stigmatize the women, and push them out of the military.

Of course, forcing homosexuals to shower with heterosexuals doesn't have the same effect on the homosexuals, because the homosexuals know the men aren't leering at them, like the homosexuals are leering at the men. It's a one-way attraction, which makes it precisely the kind of unbalanced interaction that "don't ask, don't tell" minimized.

So now, not only to homosexuals get to openly declare their sexual proclivities, but the heterosexuals will be forced to parade naked in front of the homosexuals. The gays will say that this is only fair -- but where are those same people arguing that the female soldiers should be forced to parade naked in front of the men?

84 posted on 12/18/2010 4:31:45 PM PST by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jazusamo
delenda est...
86 posted on 12/18/2010 4:33:05 PM PST by Chode (American Hedonist - *DTOM* -ww- NO Pity for the LAZY)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jazusamo

So at the base gym, is there going to be 4 shower rooms? The 2 extra being one for lesbians and the other for gay men? Or do they throw the lesbians and gay males together?

And 4 public restrooms too?

Inquiring minds want to know.


90 posted on 12/18/2010 4:40:26 PM PST by Red Steel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jazusamo

They created another victim class that will run crying to the CO every time they get their fellings hurt. I am glad I no longer have to serve in the military our politicians have made it a joke.


92 posted on 12/18/2010 4:43:29 PM PST by Americanexpat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jazusamo

They don’t have to build seperate facilities. Gay men can shower with women and lesbians can shower with men. The same with bunks.


93 posted on 12/18/2010 4:46:23 PM PST by McGavin999 ("I was there when we had the numbers, but didn't have the principles"-Jim DeMint)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: All

IOW all the negative consequences are correct.

this just proves homosexual behavior (practitioners) have no place in the military.


106 posted on 12/18/2010 5:21:19 PM PST by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jazusamo

In anticipation of the repeal of Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell, in 2007, the Pentagon prepared a list of new or reinterpreted nomenclature and practices familiar to many older veterans. The gay EM who supplied Wikileaks sent us a copy just before his arrest. Some of the more interesting items are below.

All marching commands ending in “March” will now end in either “MINCE” or “SWISH,” at the option of the individual issuing the command;

The command “Right dress right,” will be replaced with “Right strapless evening gown, allrighty;”

Due to the distinct possibility that it may be misinterpreted, the command “To the Rear March” will be replaced with “OK, Fellas, Turn Around;”

Marching cadences employing “Jodie” will now replace that archaic appellation with the more metro-sexually appropriate “Brucie:”

The humorous but now out-dated phrase “Drop your c**ks and grab your socks” is to be replaced with “Drop your c**ks and grab the fella’s over there;”

A “Junk on the bunk” inspection will now allow a soldier’s “junk” to actually be displayed on his bunk;

If it will not interfere with “his” duties, a “Latrine Queen” may wear a pair of high heel pumps if they are OD in color;

The rank of “Private” will be replaced with “Newby.”

For those still smoking, as it could lead to serious unit cohesion break-down, the phrase “Field strip that butt” will no longer be used.

As we did deeper into the documents we were provided, we will add other changes.

PS: A bonus INVESTMENT TIP: Buy shares in firms that manufacture SOAP-ON-A-ROPE!


108 posted on 12/18/2010 5:33:48 PM PST by Dick Bachert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jazusamo

This asinine discussion misses the entire point: people do not want to, and shouldn’t be required to shower with people who are sexually attracted to them. And no amount of denying can change the fact that that is just how it will be, just as if a bunch of straight guys were showering with the women service members.

Talk about a bunch of clueless, PC nitwits in charge of the US military.


110 posted on 12/18/2010 5:36:11 PM PST by Will88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jazusamo

Give it 2-3 years - they will have PINK TANKS!!! Believe it! Wait till the Army has Gay Pride day! And hey, if the heteros must shower with the gays, why can’t the hetero men shower with the hetero females? HUH?


113 posted on 12/18/2010 6:31:41 PM PST by 2harddrive
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jazusamo

So I guess gates put all faggots on the panel?

Seems that a lot of open faggots will meet unfortunate accidents after hitting on normal people


118 posted on 12/18/2010 6:48:39 PM PST by John O (God Save America (Please))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jazusamo

Dumb question: What’s the difference: Gay men are interested in other men; straight men are interested in women; lesbians are interested in women and straight women are interested in men. Why shouldn’t all women be required to bunk with and shower with the men? Uncomfortable with showering with the opposite sex? How is that different than being uncomfortable with showering with someone who is interested in your sex? Argument: Most gays aren’t sexually aggressive toward straights. Well you could make the same argument about straights and the people they are sexually drawn too. Drop off in retention of women in the military well that’s sexism on the part of the women. That’s the argument that’s used if straights would laeve the military because they were forced to live with the gay community.

If we’re going to have sexual equality and non discrimination then it has to apply to all regardless of sex or sexual orientation.

Become aggressive or make the opposite uncomfortable if it’s a straight man and a straight woman it’s sexual harassment. If it’s a straight and a gay we know it’s going to be the straight’s fault in this PC society. The cases should be treated the same with the same standards.


119 posted on 12/18/2010 6:49:29 PM PST by airedale
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jazusamo

No offense but if they back forcing gays and straights to use the same showers, they have no rational argument for separating men and women having to use separate showers either.


121 posted on 12/18/2010 6:59:13 PM PST by Secret Agent Man (I'd like to tell you, but then I'd have to kill you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jazusamo

The military must allow soldiers and officers to leave honorably if they don’t want to be part of the United States Faggot Forces.


122 posted on 12/18/2010 7:00:18 PM PST by Secret Agent Man (I'd like to tell you, but then I'd have to kill you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jazusamo

we must pressure all our republican reps and senators to back a law (and then a Constitutional Amendment) to end the two+ months lame duck session period, and have newly elected members take their seats immediately after the elections are declared valid. Or within a day or two of being declared the winner. We need to end lame duck sessions. I would also be in favor of this for the presidency as well.

This was done for logistical delays from over 230 years ago. We do not have such problems today, news and results are quickly available and travel is much faster. This is one part of the Constitution we can change without destroying original intent.


123 posted on 12/18/2010 7:05:26 PM PST by Secret Agent Man (I'd like to tell you, but then I'd have to kill you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jazusamo

Why would any normal person want to serve in Obama’s military? It’s going to turn into a freak show.


126 posted on 12/18/2010 8:15:24 PM PST by Some Fat Guy in L.A. (Wanna learn humility? Become a Pittsburgh Pirates fan!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jazusamo

I have had it with these perverts, homosexuals AND the ones in the Govt that insist on pushing this perversion, as well as others, every where they want. This is a disgrace. Period!

I am so sorry to ALL the honorable men and women who make up our military. Your country has disgraced you, again.


127 posted on 12/18/2010 8:30:15 PM PST by gidget7 ("When a man assumes a public trust, he should consider himself as public property." Thomas Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jazusamo

The obvious solution:

MEN LGBT WOMEN


128 posted on 12/18/2010 8:32:17 PM PST by faucetman (Just the facts ma'am, just the facts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jazusamo

You just had to know that our wonderful social engineers (the democrats) would eventually get around to messing up one of the last things that worked right in this country (the military). They just can’t keep their hands off anything that works well.....sure gives creedence to those on the far right who think they were out to deliberately destroy this country. It appears that they are out to do just that....destroy our country and all it stands for. The shocking thing is that we are all standing by just watching.


129 posted on 12/18/2010 9:51:56 PM PST by krogers58
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-59 last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson