Posted on 12/18/2010 3:11:51 PM PST by jazusamo
I think this rule, if implemented, would be stupid.
But all around the country, people are showering in open shower areas with homosexuals — most without their knowledge, I imagine. When I go to the gym, I don’t ask around to make sure there aren’t any gay people before I shower.
And of course, the guys in the military have been showering with the DADT gays for a while now. But it isn’t as disturbing when you don’t KNOW, I guess.
Funny how while some people have been working to try to figure out how to minimize the disruption caused by repeal, the real plan of the group seems to be to FORCE the disruption.
If I were black, I’d be pretty pissed at the argument made here. The whole point about racism being WRONG was that skin color is a MEANINGLESS DISTINCTION. But NOBODY can argue that sexual preference is MEANINGLESS. IF you threw a girl into the guy’s shower, most of the guys would be aroused, while they wouldn’t be with other guys.
Same with a homosexual, right? Isn’t that the whole reason we are being forced to do this, because homosexuals are, by their very nature, turned on by seeing naked men, and would be aroused by it, and attacted to the other men when seeing them naked?
In fact, it still seems to me that homosexuals should be kept out of the shower for THEIR OWN GOOD. They shouldn’t be unnecessarily aroused. In fact, repeal SHOULD have fixed THAT problem (while creating all the others). Before repeal, those homosexuals HAD to repress their homosexuality, and try not to get aroused in showers. But now they can just admit they are gay, and take showers separately.
(Note: You can’t have a “gay shower”, because that would be like putting dozens of self-attracted people together. That of course is the unnatural result of homosexuality: no way to divide into non-sexual groupings of greater than 2).
But, why don’t they force males and females to use the same showers?
*****************
Because they know it’s wrong and they also know DADT is wrong. It’s like rape. It’s about the power.
I know it’s not their plan, but it’s a viable solution.
Humans are part of Mother Nature...at least we’re born here.
just sayin’...
IOW all the negative consequences are correct.
this just proves homosexual behavior (practitioners) have no place in the military.
Good call, I hadn’t thought about that.
In anticipation of the repeal of Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell, in 2007, the Pentagon prepared a list of new or reinterpreted nomenclature and practices familiar to many older veterans. The gay EM who supplied Wikileaks sent us a copy just before his arrest. Some of the more interesting items are below.
All marching commands ending in “March” will now end in either “MINCE” or “SWISH,” at the option of the individual issuing the command;
The command “Right dress right,” will be replaced with “Right strapless evening gown, allrighty;”
Due to the distinct possibility that it may be misinterpreted, the command “To the Rear March” will be replaced with “OK, Fellas, Turn Around;”
Marching cadences employing “Jodie” will now replace that archaic appellation with the more metro-sexually appropriate “Brucie:”
The humorous but now out-dated phrase “Drop your c**ks and grab your socks” is to be replaced with “Drop your c**ks and grab the fella’s over there;”
A “Junk on the bunk” inspection will now allow a soldier’s “junk” to actually be displayed on his bunk;
If it will not interfere with “his” duties, a “Latrine Queen” may wear a pair of high heel pumps if they are OD in color;
The rank of “Private” will be replaced with “Newby.”
For those still smoking, as it could lead to serious unit cohesion break-down, the phrase “Field strip that butt” will no longer be used.
As we did deeper into the documents we were provided, we will add other changes.
PS: A bonus INVESTMENT TIP: Buy shares in firms that manufacture SOAP-ON-A-ROPE!
It has everything to do with weakening our military by lawsuits, threats of lawsuits, and creating uncomfortable situations within our uniformed services, and inviting good soldiers, sailors, airmen and marines to leave and be replaced by...(soldiers who will do what they are ordered to do when the order comes down to fire on American citizens who resist the government or the coming New World Order)...
(I filled in my opinion...)
This asinine discussion misses the entire point: people do not want to, and shouldn’t be required to shower with people who are sexually attracted to them. And no amount of denying can change the fact that that is just how it will be, just as if a bunch of straight guys were showering with the women service members.
Talk about a bunch of clueless, PC nitwits in charge of the US military.
If you have the skills, then there is always opportunities at $500-$600 per day + per diem food vouchers
There's always room for a motivated individual willing to do what others can't or will not do. Less PC and more autonomy.
Good point. It's all about which special interest gets to pick from the socialist money tree next in the name of 'fairness'
Give it 2-3 years - they will have PINK TANKS!!! Believe it! Wait till the Army has Gay Pride day! And hey, if the heteros must shower with the gays, why can’t the hetero men shower with the hetero females? HUH?
I have never heard of such faggotry.
Forgive me for being blunt, but it is “for both sexes”, not “for both genders”.
Liberalism/communism/socialism only survives by redefining words. Gender refers - see your dictionary - to the masculinity/femininity of words and has nothing to do with sex. Libs (=gov., media, education, unions, etc.) have given the word an incorrect definition. I refuse to go along with their redefinition/propaganda/brainwashing.
Don’t need to sit down, I’m past being shocked at my age. I only groan. Like the souls of the martyrs under the alter in Revelation, I can only cry, “How long, O Lord, how long?????”
Vote AGAINST any proposed draft! Such an “America” as THAT is not worth defending - indeed, it DESERVES to fall!
So I guess gates put all faggots on the panel?
Seems that a lot of open faggots will meet unfortunate accidents after hitting on normal people
Dumb question: What’s the difference: Gay men are interested in other men; straight men are interested in women; lesbians are interested in women and straight women are interested in men. Why shouldn’t all women be required to bunk with and shower with the men? Uncomfortable with showering with the opposite sex? How is that different than being uncomfortable with showering with someone who is interested in your sex? Argument: Most gays aren’t sexually aggressive toward straights. Well you could make the same argument about straights and the people they are sexually drawn too. Drop off in retention of women in the military well that’s sexism on the part of the women. That’s the argument that’s used if straights would laeve the military because they were forced to live with the gay community.
If we’re going to have sexual equality and non discrimination then it has to apply to all regardless of sex or sexual orientation.
Become aggressive or make the opposite uncomfortable if it’s a straight man and a straight woman it’s sexual harassment. If it’s a straight and a gay we know it’s going to be the straight’s fault in this PC society. The cases should be treated the same with the same standards.
Then he should be very ashamed, wonder why he isn’t?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.