Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Why I Oppose the Tax Deal (DeMint)
Senate Conservatives.com E-mail ^ | December 10, 2010 | Jim DeMint

Posted on 12/10/2010 8:36:41 AM PST by SharpRightTurn

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-44 next last
DeMint's reasons for opposing the McConnell-Zero tax-extension deal.

I would add that since several of the weak sisters/RINOs (Maine Bobsie twins, Scott Brown, etc.) have said they will fold on other issues (repeal of DADT) once the tax deal is settled, it would be in the best interest of conservatives to see that this tax deal--and therefore repeal of DADT, Nightmare Act, etc.--all go down in flames and let the new, more conservative Congress deal with it.

1 posted on 12/10/2010 8:36:44 AM PST by SharpRightTurn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SharpRightTurn

See if this linkie works better:

http://campaign.r20.constantcontact.com:80/render?llr=cdcltncab&v=001Q54IKSLlf4FHwLaJ6XneQPJ8uu8Yi9ajN8QbBQfibjLuHSm0VKKsZ4GIdIClCzy6VJ-m4b5yMaPb8mfTlgKNGECr0HVDO13pEKInNyHW-6e58nfq9mD79v-d3i6VjiSCsoS69oCWFXu0-MTcqqHzYQfw0F5SyFP-YQQWL2om_iE3pcwLwaO-SaaGjhNRkqhuqM97D3QVqr73vadFtx6gU2xFHhzf32RGhJBCUYbmypBRGOpsbSdebVa1Z6q0br-S589D2glb-SvtngUiCCGw0u0GNof0JFrBw6zgjM3pCus%3D


2 posted on 12/10/2010 8:38:59 AM PST by SharpRightTurn (White, black, and red all over--America's affirmative action, metrosexual president.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SharpRightTurn

I completely agree. Stretch it out to final minute. The RINOs and RINETTEs will indeed cave on the other issues.


3 posted on 12/10/2010 8:40:33 AM PST by ScottinVA (The West needs to act NOW to aggressively treat its metastasizing islaminoma!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SharpRightTurn

The Republicans need to tell people that the top 10% of those EVIL RICH (”Wealthiest among us”) already pay about 90% of all the taxes

please can some one tell me where i can find the exact figures?

WE ARE STILL LETTING THE DEMOCRAPS AND THE MEDIA CONTROL THE LANGUAGE OF THIS ARGUMENT!!!!!!!!!


4 posted on 12/10/2010 8:43:32 AM PST by Mr. K ('Profiling' is much worse than grabbing your balls)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SharpRightTurn

Sharp Right Turn is perfectly correct. I accord with SRT.


5 posted on 12/10/2010 8:43:36 AM PST by magna carta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SharpRightTurn

I agree. Let the new congress handle this.


6 posted on 12/10/2010 8:54:12 AM PST by RedMDer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SharpRightTurn

Finally, the bill now includes dozens of earmarks for special interests, including ethanol subsidies, tax breaks for film and television producers, give aways for Puerto Rican rum manufacturers, favors for auto racing track owners, and a hand out for businesses in American Samoa.

Sooooo sick of this crap.


7 posted on 12/10/2010 8:54:17 AM PST by sheana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SharpRightTurn

“The bill...increases the death tax...One economic study shows that this tax increase alone will kill over 800,000 jobs over the next ten years.”

—Just great- a job killing bill loaded with pork that raises taxes and gives Obama a chance to look “bi-partisan”. Is there any other way the Establishment GOP could bungle this?

Thanks for speaking out against this, Senator DeMint.


8 posted on 12/10/2010 8:54:25 AM PST by Qbert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. K

http://www.ntu.org/tax-basics/who-pays-income-taxes.html


9 posted on 12/10/2010 8:54:43 AM PST by cowtowney
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: SharpRightTurn
I appreciate the efforts made by my party's leaders to negotiate this deal but I believe Americans deserve much better. This deal should be rejected and then fixed. We can easily extend these tax rates without increasing spending once the new crop of Republican senators, including Pat Toomey, Marco Rubio, Rand Paul, Mike Lee, and Ron Johnson, are sworn in. The President has already conceded that taxes cannot go up and we'll have more Republicans in Congress in a few weeks to fight for a better deal.

This is a cogent analysis. That said, it seems that even if this deal goes through, the same process of fixing it quickly once the new Congress is seated can occur. IOW, I'm not sure DeMint's tactics are exactly necessary to end up with his preferred result.

The other point that occurs to me is that maybe this was a deal made with the strong intuition that it was going to fall apart of its own accord anyway. Mitch McConnell and Boehner can count votes as well as anyone, and I seriously doubt the blowback Obama is (and, for that matter, they themselves are) receiving is a big surprise to them.

Looking at it this way,

(1) the GOP has put the Rats in the position of raising taxes (if they scuttle the deal);

(2) obtained the President's many and clear statements that he agrees with the principle that tax increases HURT the economy and tax cuts HELP the economy;

(3) revealed in graphic terms the Rats' absolute bloodlust for RAISING TAXES at all costs, even at the cost of tearing down The One; and

(4) invited the Tea Party movement to pay attention and stay engaged in holding the GOP accountable (from the other end of the stick, providing congresscritters with continuing high-profile infusions of political capital).

Film at 11:00.

10 posted on 12/10/2010 8:55:02 AM PST by fightinJAG (Americans: the only people in the world protesting AGAINST government "benefits.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SharpRightTurn
I'm sorry, but any proposal to reduce significantly reduce the deficit that does not include both tax increases and spending cuts is just grandstanding.

Which is mostly what were are now getting for both sides.

11 posted on 12/10/2010 8:55:25 AM PST by M. Dodge Thomas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Qbert

This ‘negotiation’ just proves that the Republicans in leadership positions have learned nothing. I expected no less.


12 posted on 12/10/2010 8:55:30 AM PST by sheana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: sheana

Agreed.


13 posted on 12/10/2010 8:56:19 AM PST by fightinJAG (Americans: the only people in the world protesting AGAINST government "benefits.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: SharpRightTurn

I agree it would be best to let this die and let the new congress deal with it, when they have a stronger hand to play with.


14 posted on 12/10/2010 8:56:23 AM PST by fuzzybutt (Democrat Lawyers are the root of all evil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SharpRightTurn

McConnel cut a secret backroom deal with his socialist friends in the WH and now wants Americans to follow his own socialist agenda.

He needs to be marked with defeat his next election cycle.


15 posted on 12/10/2010 9:01:07 AM PST by stockpirate (David Horowitz Democratic Party has been "seized by a religious cult" of the left!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SharpRightTurn

There are at least two good reasons for speaking out like this.

1. It uses up more time and leaves less time to pass lame duck monstrosities.

2. You don’t have a two-party fight over a bill by letting one party demand more while the other party just demands what is already in the bill. That will inevitably lead to the party demanding more getting more. If the Dems demand more, then the Republicans must match them, demand for demand, until they settle on a compromise. In recent times, the Republicans have been very bad at that, with the Dems making all the demands and the Republicans giving in to them.

3. I too am worried by the two-year extension. If we cannot make it permanent, which should certainly be our bargaining position, then we need to make it at least THREE YEARS, or else we’ll end up, at best, with another lame duck session in 2012 with Obama on the way out and having nothing to lose. In that position, why on earth would he do anything to help the Republicans or the country?


16 posted on 12/10/2010 9:01:34 AM PST by Cicero (Marcus Tullius.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SharpRightTurn
To me DeMint is the true defacto leader of the Senate, certainly the one giving the best voice to the conservative cause. While I would do just about anything to see Obama fail (he really doesn't need my help), its not that that gets me all wound up. It's the debt load being foisted on my children and grandchildren.

I can remember when people were up in arms over a deficit of about ten billion dollars (which, at the time, did seem like an incredible amount of money). Today, we talk in terms of hundreds of billions like it was nothing. The new vocabulary is about trillions. Who can actually even fathom what a trillion dollars is?

17 posted on 12/10/2010 9:01:53 AM PST by The Citizen Soldier (Obama: All turban, no camels.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Mr. K

http://www.ntu.org/tax-basics/who-pays-income-taxes.html


18 posted on 12/10/2010 9:02:18 AM PST by cowtowney
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: sheana

David Freddoso writes:

“Remember all of those special interest tax breaks in the 2008 TARP bill?

- Film and Television Productions (Sec. 502)
- Wooden Arrows designed for use by children (Sec. 503)
- Virgin Island and Puerto Rican Rum (Section 308)
- American Samoa (Sec. 309)
- Mine Rescue Teams (Sec. 310)
- Mine Safety Equipment (Sec. 311)
- Domestic Production Activities in Puerto Rico (Sec. 312)
- Indian Tribes (Sec. 314, 315)
- Railroads (Sec. 316)
- Auto Racing Tracks (317)
- District of Columbia (Sec. 322)
- Wool Research (Sec. 325)

Many of them are back. Although I’m not sure yet whether the “research credit” is for “wool research.”

-Research credit.
-Indian employment tax credit.
-New markets tax credit.
-Railroad track maintenance credit.
-Mine rescue team training credit.
-7-year recovery period for motorsports entertainment complexes.
-Accelerated depreciation for business property on an Indian reservation.
-Election to expense mine safety equipment.
-Special expensing rules for certain film and television productions.
-Expensing of environmental remediation costs.
-Deduction allowable with respect to income attributable to domestic production activities in Puerto Rico.
-Tax incentives for investment in the District of Columbia.
-Temporary increase in limit on cover over of rum excise taxes to Puerto Rico and the Virgin Islands.
-American Samoa economic development credit.”

http://washingtonexaminer.com/blogs/beltway-confidential/2010/12/oh-christmas-tree-tarp-special-interest-provisions-reappear-bipar


19 posted on 12/10/2010 9:03:09 AM PST by Qbert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Qbert

The establishment GOP is not bungling this issue, they are also socialists and this is exactly what they wantm


20 posted on 12/10/2010 9:06:26 AM PST by stockpirate (David Horowitz Democratic Party has been "seized by a religious cult" of the left!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-44 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson