Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Ancesthntr
The idea behind Wickard is so fundamentally at odds with the concept of a limited federal government that I simply cannot understand why it hasn’t already been overturned. The case stood for the proposition that a farmer cannot even grow food for his own family on his own farm, because of the fact that by doing so he will reduce demand for the food produced by other farmers (including some across state lines), thereby upsetting some 5-year master plan dictated by the Politburo errrr, Department of Agriculture.

And yet GWB, who professed to want "original intent" SC justices sent his Justice Department lawyers before the Supreme Court to argue to uphold it in the Raisch case.....

12 posted on 12/03/2010 7:35:03 AM PST by tacticalogic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]


To: tacticalogic; Ancesthntr
...the Raisch case...

Was that the case where Wickard was cited by (Roberts?, Alito?) in the majority opinion? Do I just recall incorrectly?

15 posted on 12/03/2010 7:45:00 AM PST by MileHi ( "It's coming down to patriots vs the politicians." - ovrtaxt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson