So, if the government gives them money, they will turn around and spend it. Theyve got to.
No, they don't. Heard this the other night because my V-chip failed for the very first time. Gotta get a new one.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-29 last
To: Libloather
Wow, think how much the economy would be stimulated if ALL OF US were drawing unemployment benefits.
30 posted on
12/02/2010 4:32:45 PM PST by
randita
To: Libloather
Twenty-six weeks is six months. If you can’t find ANY JOB in six months, what is the probability of you finding employment after your benefits expire? Probabily better than still receiving unemployment checks, which gets people accustomed to not working and not looking for work.
To: Libloather
"The single most effective policy for creating jobs: unemployment benefits"![](http://i48.photobucket.com/albums/f204/kent18/jfp.jpg)
34 posted on
12/02/2010 4:45:01 PM PST by
KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle
("If you're not fiscally AND socially conservative, you're not conservative!" - Jim Robinson, 9-1-10)
To: Libloather
Well let’s think about this. How many people does it take to process the application for benefits, two, three, ten? Depends on the gubmint. How many apps can a gubmint grunt process in a day? And what’s his salary? as opposed to...how much grab can a gub grunt grant?
You know, she could be onto something! If we employ more people to give people money, than we have people getting money, we have more employment!
There’s just one hitch. Where will the gubmint get the loot to pay the caseworkers at unemployment?
Rachel, do you know?
Does anybody?
(all FReeper hands go up)
Er...Mr. Galt, where are you going? We’re not finished here!
To: Libloather
So, all this time the libtards have been telling us trickle down economics doesn't work what they really meant is that it only works if the government does the trickling on us.
39 posted on
12/02/2010 4:57:13 PM PST by
crazyhorse691
(Now that the libs are in power dissent is not only unpatriotic, but, it is also racist.)
To: Libloather
I did a bio once on Maddow and discovered she was a Stanford grad and a Rhodes Scholar (attended Oxford). This puzzled me a great deal. How can a person graduate from a top line university and be so incredible stupid and foolish. The only explanation I can come up with is that liberalism destroys the cognitive functions of the brain. She may have had a degree of intellectual prowess early in her life but when she crossed over to the dark side of liberalism, it destroyed any sense of reality. As the Radio talk show host Michael Savage says all the time; Liberalism is a Mental Disorder. Maddow has this disorder in spades.
40 posted on
12/02/2010 5:03:26 PM PST by
truthguy
(Good intentions are not enough.)
To: Libloather
Also in the same report:
The nonpartisan CBO endorsed alchemy as a way to increase gold holdings and shrink debt, consulting Miss Cleo to determine lucky Lotto numbers that could magnify the alchemy profits, and finally to employ perpetual motion and cold fusion as ways to use green technology to put people to work and reduce CO2.
.
42 posted on
12/02/2010 5:16:08 PM PST by
Seaplaner
(Never give in. Never give in. Never...except to convictions of honour and good sense. W. Churchill)
To: Libloather
Well, if unemployment benefits are so beneficial to the economy I suggest that Madcow do her part to help Barry and the Democrat Party and quit her job.
46 posted on
12/02/2010 11:42:35 PM PST by
VeniVidiVici
(What's black and white and red all over? HINT: Think White House)
To: Libloather
I suggest firing Madcow and see how that benefits the economy. It just might, proving her right in a fashion.
47 posted on
12/03/2010 9:12:19 AM PST by
junta
(S.C.U.M. = State Controlled Unreliable Media)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-29 last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson