Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

(Flashback) The Club for Growth opposes Congressman Hunter
Free Republic ^ | October 30, 2006 | Andrew Roth

Posted on 11/22/2010 8:55:22 PM PST by Josh Painter

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-42 next last
To: pissant

Free Trade is preferable to Protectionism every day of the week and twice on Sunday.

Hunter has just a good a chance of becoming President as his father did NONE. You want to talk about a farce that was the Hunter campaign.


21 posted on 11/22/2010 9:32:41 PM PST by arrogantsob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Georgia Girl 2

Yeah, let the politicians make even more decisions about the economy that is the ticket. Give them even more power over the markets isn’t that the conservative dream?


22 posted on 11/22/2010 9:34:37 PM PST by arrogantsob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Josh Painter

Is Duncan Hunter, Sr., seriously, considering running for POTUS in ‘12? Is this the main reason for posting this, or not? I, still, like him, despite all of the reasons why many other people don’t like him.


23 posted on 11/22/2010 9:35:55 PM PST by johnthebaptistmoore (If leftist legislation that's already in place really can't be ended by non-leftists, then what?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rockitz

Free trade is no myth and what you are objecting too isn’t even free trade but managed trade. Tariffs are the means for politicians to seize even MORE power over our economic life something we should resist like the plague.


24 posted on 11/22/2010 9:36:48 PM PST by arrogantsob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: arrogantsob

Almost as bad as McCain’s stalking horse, Fred.


25 posted on 11/22/2010 9:39:42 PM PST by pissant (THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: arrogantsob

So why do you support free trade over protectionism?


26 posted on 11/22/2010 9:41:57 PM PST by wastedyears (Being "mad as hell" just won't cut it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: CharlesWayneCT

“When I see posts like this, I think of this sad song from the TV show “Dollhouse”:
Remains - (Burn down my home)”

Was there a song for Hannibal Lechter’s cannabalism?


27 posted on 11/22/2010 9:42:23 PM PST by Kent C
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: pissant

Resistance is futile. You will be assimilated.


28 posted on 11/22/2010 9:51:14 PM PST by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: johnthebaptistmoore

No, the reason for posting this is to expose pissy’s blatant hypocrisy. He insists on dredging up posts from years ago and referencing leftist news sources to bash Palin.

As long as he keeps doing that, I’ll respond in kind. If he would stop, I would stop, and we could go on to more productive discussions. But I have no reason to believe he would stop. There’s no cure for PDS.


29 posted on 11/22/2010 10:05:15 PM PST by Josh Painter ("May we always be happy, and may our enemies know it." - Sarah Palin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Josh Painter

Not to change the subject, but we’ve beaten “free trade” to death.

So what’s wrong with “No Child Left Behind”? I’m usually against top-down micro-management, but when we have a politicized educational establishment and a teachers gone wild workforce, I’d call “No Child Left Behind” a valiant effort at stopping a runaway train.

Unfortunately, our Dept of Education was already an insane asylum when “No Child Left Behind” was conceived, and no cure is possible. So let’s use the remainder of the “education” budget to put the education administrators on a one way cruise ship to any continent that will accept them. Global Warming makes Antarctica the perfect destination.


30 posted on 11/22/2010 10:11:53 PM PST by haroldeveryman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Josh Painter; pissant

pissant is a troll. Pity, but he’s crossed the line and the Sarah Palin hatred isn’t welcome. Can’t attack her current policies -— policies of her own, so this “flashback stuff from McCain’s run” is the stuff of hateful losers.

Good job, Josh!


31 posted on 11/22/2010 10:18:02 PM PST by onyx (If you truly support Sarah Palin and want on her busy ping list, let me know!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: onyx

Yep. It’s always a good job when you find an open borders outfit like CFG to lambaste Hunter. ROFL


32 posted on 11/22/2010 10:26:10 PM PST by pissant (THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: onyx

BTW, her current amnesty policy sounds exactly like her old one.


33 posted on 11/22/2010 10:30:11 PM PST by pissant (THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Josh Painter

Protectionist Porkers don’t get my vote.....


34 posted on 11/22/2010 10:44:20 PM PST by Sonny M ("oderint dum metuant")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Josh Painter; pissant

PDS? Pissant Derangement Syndrome...


35 posted on 11/22/2010 11:07:42 PM PST by FTJM
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Josh Painter

Club for Growth didn’t like the most conservative in the race? Next thing you’ll tell me is that CPAC is pushing for gay rights.


36 posted on 11/22/2010 11:08:11 PM PST by Kevmo (Has Obama resigned yet?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wastedyears

Free Trade allows the market to more efficiently allocate scarce resources. When politicians decide relative prices and how and where goods are supplied it results in less for everyone.

Communist decision-making processes ruin the markets and increase the power of the political class. Protectionism uses the same principles where the Central Committee (Congressional Committees) decide on tariff rates and which industries are to be favored and also disfavored.

There has never been a totally Free Trade system in effect anywhere or at any time but that is the goal which should be aimed at by governments.

I would except certain defense industries from the application of Free Trade principles but that is for a political purpose i.e. national security.


37 posted on 11/22/2010 11:24:49 PM PST by arrogantsob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: pissant

Was that remark intended to have some meaning?


38 posted on 11/22/2010 11:26:13 PM PST by arrogantsob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Josh Painter

Rapunzel?


39 posted on 11/23/2010 12:04:55 AM PST by Vendome (Don't take life so seriously... You'll never live through it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Josh Painter

40 posted on 11/23/2010 4:50:15 AM PST by traditional1 ("Don't gotsta worry 'bout no mo'gage, don't gotsta worry 'bout no gas; Obama gonna take care o' me!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-42 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson