Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Sen. Inhofe: Earmarks Apart Of Congress' "Constitutional Duties"
RealClearPolitics ^ | November 15, 2010 | RealClearPolitics

Posted on 11/15/2010 2:50:13 PM PST by i88schwartz

Sen. James Inhofe (R-Okla.) spent a lengthy period of time on the Senate floor this afternoon defending earmarks. Inhofe argues it is the constitutional duty (citing Article 1, Section 9) of the Congress to appropriate earmarks.

(Excerpt) Read more at realclearpolitics.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: bribery; bribes; debt; earmarks; jamesinhofe; ok; porkulus; spending
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-43 next last

1 posted on 11/15/2010 2:50:15 PM PST by i88schwartz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: i88schwartz

Inhoff...kiss my Obama.


2 posted on 11/15/2010 2:53:09 PM PST by Da Coyote
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: i88schwartz

Apart or “A part”?...makes a difference RCP.


3 posted on 11/15/2010 2:55:25 PM PST by BobL (The whole point of being human is knowing when the party's over.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: i88schwartz

This slug is up for reelection in 2012?

Toss him.


4 posted on 11/15/2010 2:56:14 PM PST by Peter W. Kessler (Dirt is for racing... asphalt is for getting there.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Peter W. Kessler

“This slug is up for reelection in 2012?

Toss him.”

Technically he may have a point (i.e., why should Obama direct spending, and thereby have the power to ignore his state?). But TOO LATE. Mr. Inhofe should have made that point to Mr. McCain and ESPECIALLY Mr. Stevens first.

This is not the fight to pick - GIVE IT UP, at least for now. Mr. Inhofe is a top-of-the-line conservative, don’t throw it away for a few “demonstration projects”.


5 posted on 11/15/2010 2:59:55 PM PST by BobL (The whole point of being human is knowing when the party's over.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: i88schwartz

Bye Bye.


6 posted on 11/15/2010 3:01:46 PM PST by Thom Pain (November 2, 2010. Step ONE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Peter W. Kessler

For a number of years now, Senator Inhofe has been among the top three or four most conservative U. S. Senators. We Okies aren’t going to “toss him” because of this.

Who are your two Senators? Care to compare?


7 posted on 11/15/2010 3:02:48 PM PST by savedbygrace (But God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: i88schwartz

U. S. Constitution Article I Section 9
The migration or importation of such persons as any of the states now existing shall think proper to admit, shall not be prohibited by the Congress prior to the year one thousand eight hundred and eight, but a tax or duty may be imposed on such importation, not exceeding ten dollars for each person.

The privilege of the writ of habeas corpus shall not be suspended, unless when in cases of rebellion or invasion the public safety may require it.

No bill of attainder or ex post facto Law shall be passed.

No capitation, or other direct, tax shall be laid, unless in proportion to the census or enumeration herein before directed to be taken. (See Sixteenth Amendment}

No tax or duty shall be laid on articles exported from any state.

No preference shall be given by any regulation of commerce or revenue to the ports of one state over those of another: nor shall vessels bound to, or from, one state, be obliged to enter, clear or pay duties in another.

No money shall be drawn from the treasury, but in consequence of appropriations made by law; and a regular statement and account of receipts and expenditures of all public money shall be published from time to time.

No title of nobility shall be granted by the United States: and no person holding any office of profit or trust under them, shall, without the consent of the Congress, accept of any present, emolument, office, or title, of any kind whatever, from any king, prince, or foreign state.


8 posted on 11/15/2010 3:06:08 PM PST by Repeal The 17th
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: i88schwartz

Watering the Tree of Liberty from time to time is a duty as well.


9 posted on 11/15/2010 3:17:39 PM PST by Psalm 144
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: savedbygrace
We Okies aren’t going to “toss him” because of this.

Certainly not while he keeps the pork rolling in.

10 posted on 11/15/2010 3:18:25 PM PST by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: i88schwartz

How do you spell R-I-N-O whiner?


11 posted on 11/15/2010 3:19:51 PM PST by gitmogrunt (Numb nuts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BobL

Blame the poster. It’s correct at RCP.


12 posted on 11/15/2010 3:19:55 PM PST by Cyber Liberty (We conservatives will always lose elections as long as we allow the MSM to choose our candidates.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Peter W. Kessler
No one who has stood so strong for life should be called a "slug".

Don't toss Inhofe. He's also one of the strongest crusaders in Congress against Al Gore and Global Warming.

13 posted on 11/15/2010 3:20:59 PM PST by Siena Dreaming
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: gitmogrunt
Sen. Inhofe: Earmarks Apart Of Congress' "Constitutional Duties"

It's more appropriate for an elected member of Congress to determine how some money is spent rather than an unelected bureaucrat like someone in the EPA. You can vote out the member of Congress. There's nothing you can do about the EPA functionary.
14 posted on 11/15/2010 3:22:23 PM PST by aruanan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: gitmogrunt
Sen. Inhofe: Earmarks Apart Of Congress' "Constitutional Duties"

It's more appropriate for an elected member of Congress to determine how some money is spent rather than an unelected bureaucrat like someone in the EPA. You can vote out the member of Congress. There's nothing you can do about the EPA functionary.

Besides, focussing on earmarks is like someone worrying about a mosquito biting his arm when his entire lower body is being gnawed away by piranhas. There are much bigger spending targets (thousands and hundreds of thousands times bigger) to hit than earmarks.
15 posted on 11/15/2010 3:24:58 PM PST by aruanan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Cyber Liberty

“Blame the poster. It’s correct at RCP.”

It is NOW. But I have a witness that it was wrong at RCP when I posted.

Dad: Junior, did you see that RCP blew it?
Junior: Yeh. I’m trying to text my friends. Friggin parents.


16 posted on 11/15/2010 3:26:57 PM PST by BobL (The whole point of being human is knowing when the party's over.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: i88schwartz

The problem I have with pork is that they are ADDED to bills in the middle of the night and have nothing to do with the bill itself. It could be the VA appropriation, and all of a sudden 1000 earmarks are added for bridges to nowhere, studies of mosquitoes in Brazil and for the son-in-law’s “green” business.


17 posted on 11/15/2010 3:31:37 PM PST by radioone (Proud to be an enemy of Obama)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: i88schwartz

Earmarks are often used for wasteful projects, and thus they should be stopped for that reason alone regardless of their total cost.

Also, earmarks are also often used to bribe legislators to vote for other bills, and thus they should be stopped for that as well.

They are also used to keep people in power (look at Alaska) when they should get the boot.

They are bad in every way.


18 posted on 11/15/2010 3:31:40 PM PST by HwyChile
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur

If you think that’s it, then you are exceedingly misinformed.


19 posted on 11/15/2010 3:35:08 PM PST by savedbygrace (But God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: BobL

It’s hard to see your Blackberry when you’re reporting from your Mom’s basement...

(referring to RCP, not you)


20 posted on 11/15/2010 3:36:11 PM PST by Cyber Liberty (We conservatives will always lose elections as long as we allow the MSM to choose our candidates.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-43 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson