Posted on 11/01/2010 2:04:07 PM PDT by nickcarraway
“It is relevant to the other dudes defense. Of course he wants to cast doubt on another potential suspect.”
Yes, and if the Court failed to order Condit to answer (and the objection was made properly), way to cause a mistrial.
bingo — the death of a staffer of his probably started that rumor and his ‘99 divorce.
originally one of the young turks in the ‘96 house and a Federalist coalition member, he is now more concerned that Newt was mean.
I’ll take that as a “YES”.
I recall that Condit and Levi were the headline on Fox and Friends at 7:30 AM on September 11, 2001. Obviously, they didn’t stay in the headlines that horrible day.
Is or was there a Mrs. Condit? ...she may have cared.
LLS
It is not relevant to the prosecution. But it is relevant to the defense because their job is to raise reasonable doubt. Pointing to other potential assailants who may have a motive to kill the victim. An illicit affair raises the spectre of such a motive.
Thank you.
LLS
I completely understand the law... and if the judge does not compel Condit to testify as to sex... then he agrees also.
Now nick... I never said that. I said that whether they had sex or not is not relevant IMHO... if the judge forces the testimony or jails Condit for obstruction... then I was wrong. You make it sound as if I am trying to railroad this other guy... which I am not. It is just an opinion... no more... no less.
LLS
Never a suspect? Am I missing something here? He was the focus of the police investigation early on ... his apartment was searched for evidence and he was questioned by the Washington, DC police.
See my posts where I state that if the judge compels him to testify as to sex... then I was wrong in my opinion... if the judge does not force him to testify about it... then he agrees that in this case, it is not relevant. Either way... it is just an opinion.
LLS
They’ve got NOTHING....NOTHING on the immigrant...no evidence whatsoever!! I still think it was the EVIL brother of Condit and his other brother with Condit’s approval, of course! Just my opinion.
Have not really folled this case much, but if all the prosecutor has is an alleged jailhouse confession, I would not vote guilty.
Hey... I respect your opinion.
LLS
I beg to differ. Gary was having an affair with this young lady. That is why he was being investigated. Right?
An affair is very much part of any murder investigation if TV crime shows are right. Most people are murdered by people they know. He ‘ruined’ his own life by breaking the rules. Not innocent in any way.
“there is no physical evidence linking him to the crime”
Why is this guy, the suspect, being prosecuted for then? Somebody said somebody said somebody he did it or one of those who said “I killed the Lindbergh baby”.
I agree... and she should castrate him if he did... but again... that is between Condit and his wife... if she exists.
LLS
Chandra excitedly told her aunt she was having an affair with Condit and was hoping he would leave his wife and be with her, and was dreading her internship ending and having to go back home.
Condit’s sometime paramour, the flight attendant, often saw very long, curly, dark hairs (exactly like Chandra’s) around Condit’s bedroom and also knew he was seeing a girl with that hair type.
We all know he was shtupping Chandra.
Condit DARES talk about decency, does he??? He of the wife back home and interns in his bed???
Kasich.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.