Posted on 10/19/2010 5:39:40 PM PDT by ConservativeStatement
Isn’t Virginia Thomas Barbara Bush’s cousin? I think she is!
After demanding Bush 41 replace Thurgood Marshall with a Black Justice, the Dems were dismayed when Bush appointed a well qualified and Conservative Black jurist.....Clarence Thomas. Led by womanizer Teddy Kennedy and former Communist Party Lawyer Metzenbaugh, the left hatched q plot to accuse AThomas of sexual harrassment to avoid the appearence of racism when opposing Thomas. The Plot backfired in both fat Teddys and commie Howard’s faces............
After enduring false testimony by Anita Hill, and presenting testimony from numerious former female co-workers as to his workplace demeanor. Justice Thomas told the Judiciary Commitee that he would no longer participate in their “electronic lynching.” In effect he dared them vote him down. They didn’t.....They couldn’t.
Thomas’s courage, on display for all to see is the most memorable example of moral fiber I have ever seen in my entire life. He is one of the unsung American heroes that have made this country great.
It wasn;t all a loss for the Dem’s. They gained a new, but phony, victim Anita Hills, along with a talking point about sexual harrassment in the workplace.....
Clarance Thomas? Salute!
It’s interesting that right after the hearings 2 out of 3 people thought Hill was lying. 1 year later after constant MSM propaganda that number had reversed and 2 out of 3 thought that Thomas was lying. If you watched her testimony it was obvious she was a liar and not a very good one at that but I guess people are easily influenced. Kind of like that old joke “who are you going to believe, me or your lying eyes?”.
Anita Hill is a creepy, angry radical. Ginny’s olive branch will be be sent to the woodchipper. When will conservatives realize that the majority of leftists are trashy people? Bob
I think the good judge’s wife may take a drink now and then...
I met Ginny Thomas some weeks ago at an event here in Jacksonville. She is a very down to earth and perceptionally honest person. Not full of herself and likes to cut up and laugh. Her attempt to give Anita (I can never get that sound of Judge Kirchner (sp) saying her name) the chance to seek forgiveness is quite possibly exactly as it appears.
For some reason she really likes Jacksonville because she is returning for a planned Tea Party election night party at the Landing.
This is strange.
Maybe Ginny had a few too many cocktails?
“I did place a call to Ms. Hill at her office extending an olive branch to her after all these years, in hopes that we could ultimately get passed (sic) what happened so long ago,” Virginia Thomas said.
“That offer still stands, I would be very happy to meet and talk with her if she would be willing to do the same. Certainly no offense was ever intended.”
http://finance.yahoo.com/news/Justice-Thomas-wife-calls-rb-3868859342.html?x=0
Yes. When Brock came out as a Democrat he pretended to retract "The Real Anita Hill," but I never heard him describe specifically what portions of the book were incorrect. I suspect the reason is that the vast majority of the book was accurate. It made a fairly convincing case against Hill.
Thomas went out of his way to help Anita Hill advance her career, and she repaid him by stabbing him in the back. Even if Hill's testimony was accurate, and there is good reason to suspect it was not, Thomas did not sexually harass her under any sane standard of sexual harassment. As a Yale-educated lawyer, Hill tried to play a victim card that she never owned.
That was a “high tech lynching”, an abomination supported by Biden, the liar, Teddy Kennedy the murdering rapist, and Metzenbaum the demented chimp! It was a sickening, freak show and they let it happen.
Hill’s story sucked, she had no verification, she told no one of the supposed traumatic events when they occurred, and in fact kept calling Judge Thomas for years afterward for mentoring. It was a broken down, weak, he-said-she-said and the scumbag Dems launched it to stop a black conservative from being put on the court. In any other world this improbable story never would have seen the light of day. Biden, the liar and plagiarist of all time, trashed Thomas savagely and he never paid the price for that crime. Biden is an amoral jackass, ‘thou shall not bear false witness’. It is difficult to take him seriously.
All the woman who worked with Thomas stood up for him and said they never witnessed one iota of this supposed harassment. As we know from Clinton and others, harassers do this to multiple victims, yet they could not find another one for Thomas. It was worse than the Bork hearings. It was as fake as a Stalinist show trial.
Yep...was thinking the same thing. Lying before Congress under oath...not a good thing and is perjury, so no way, no how she’ll apologize. To apologize would let the world know she lied. Mrs. Thomas kind of put her in a spot, didn’t she and we all see it? Strategery!
Not at all. It could easily have been some nut showing the early stages of some weird (and potentially dangerous) obsession with Thomas and/or Hill.
“It could easily have been some nut showing the early stages of some weird (and potentially dangerous) obsession with Thomas and/or Hill.”
So what? Even if it was a prank, and there’s little evidence to think it was, it wasn’t a malicious prank. And there’s non reason to think it would have grown to be malicious. Any more than any prank that’s ever been pulled on me, for instance, led me to believe I was soon to be the victim of a stalker. Except, of course, that Anita Hill is (or was) a celebrity. Which I guess means celebrities are of a seperate legal class from the rest of us, and the merest hint of danger to them deserves the attention of the authorities.
Or maybe it doesn’t, and she’s a DRAMA QUEEN who’s wasting everyone’s time (again).
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.