Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Republican Sen. Scott Brown Won't Back Kagan
NewsMax ^ | Thursday, 05 Aug 2010 01:40 PM | Unknown

Posted on 08/05/2010 12:35:33 PM PDT by maddog55

Republican Sen. Scott Brown of Massachusetts says he'll vote against confirming Elena Kagan to be a Supreme Court justice. The first-term senator was widely regarded as a potential Republican vote for President Barack Obama's nominee, who already has the backing of five other Republicans and is assured of confirmation by the Democratic-controlled Senate. Brown announced his plans Thursday just hours before the Senate vote. Brown says in a statement that he considers Kagan brilliant, but that he can't vote for a Supreme Court nominee who doesn't have judicial or courtroom experience. Kagan has served as the Obama administration's solicitor general and has been dean of Harvard Law School. © Copyright 2010 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

(Excerpt) Read more at newsmax.com ...


TOPICS: Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: scottbrown
My guess is he's trying to make up for his vote on financial regulation knowing the Maine Rino's helped with Kagan anyway.
1 posted on 08/05/2010 12:35:33 PM PDT by maddog55
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: maddog55

Wait five minutes...something will distract him.


2 posted on 08/05/2010 12:37:27 PM PDT by DefeatCorruption
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: maddog55

Let’s hope he sticks to it. I don’t trust him an inch.


3 posted on 08/05/2010 12:39:30 PM PDT by Cicero (Marcus Tullius.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: maddog55
Martha Coakely would have sponsored her in the Senate.
4 posted on 08/05/2010 12:39:31 PM PDT by AU72
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: maddog55

5 Republicans voting a Communist on the SCOTUS. They gotta go!


5 posted on 08/05/2010 12:44:04 PM PDT by screaminsunshine (m)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DefeatCorruption

Yeah, he needs his back scratched again.


6 posted on 08/05/2010 12:44:37 PM PDT by TribalPrincess2U (demonicRATS... taxes, pain and slow death. Is this what you want?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: maddog55

This is a meaningless pander vote to the base that elected him. He probably got permission from Kerry to vote against her.


7 posted on 08/05/2010 12:45:34 PM PDT by Joe 6-pack (Que me amat, amet et canem meum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: maddog55
Nice that mr. brown (rino big time) is "standing up" for a foregone conclusion.

What a phony.

What a lib!

8 posted on 08/05/2010 12:46:24 PM PDT by Logic n' Reason ("Buzzard's gotta eat; same as worms.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: maddog55

If he sticks to this decision... he proves he is better than kennedy.

LLS


9 posted on 08/05/2010 12:47:01 PM PDT by LibLieSlayer (WOLVERINES!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Joe 6-pack

Right you are. This is a vote that means nothing. He is voting against her because he needs some street ‘cred to make up for his disastrous vote on Financial Regulation Reform.


10 posted on 08/05/2010 12:47:31 PM PDT by lone star annie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: maddog55

he playing the game, he kown they have the vote for her


11 posted on 08/05/2010 12:49:22 PM PDT by goldendays
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: maddog55

McConnell, Mitch - (R - KY) Class II
361A RUSSELL SENATE OFFICE BUILDING WASHINGTON DC 20510
(202) 224-2541
Web Form: www.mcconnell.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?p=contact

mcconnell need you tell any one that vote for her will not get a committee chairmentship next year we are now in a war for FREEDOMmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm


12 posted on 08/05/2010 12:55:14 PM PDT by goldendays
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: maddog55

Hopefully he won’t see any shiny metal before he actually votes.


13 posted on 08/05/2010 12:58:16 PM PDT by Republic of Texas (Socialism Always Fails)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: maddog55

There is no more vote trading.

If you cant do it 100% of the time, then you might as well not be there.

He decided he doesn’t want to be there.


14 posted on 08/05/2010 1:01:44 PM PDT by VanDeKoik (Iran doesnt have a 2nd admendment. Ya see how that turned out?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: maddog55

Absolutely right. The only reason he’ll change his mind is that he knows he’s covered and is trying to mitigate the hit he took on the other thing he voted for. Happens all the time. He’s a POS, he revealed himself already. I’m surprised, his being from Mass. , that he would choose to vote against Haavaad girl Kagan.


15 posted on 08/05/2010 1:06:42 PM PDT by FrdmLvr ( VIVA la SB 1070!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: maddog55

I’d rather he have voted for this and the damn extension of unemployment and held strong against that disastrous Financial Reg bill. He went sideways on the worst bill of all, and is holding strong on things where it doesn’t matter.


16 posted on 08/05/2010 1:07:02 PM PDT by ilgipper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cicero

Me either.


17 posted on 08/05/2010 1:09:21 PM PDT by trisham (Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: maddog55

While I sent money to Scott Brown’s campaign, he’s not my favorite and I don’t plan to send any again. That being said, he is far better than the “Dingbat Twins” or Mike Castle.


18 posted on 08/05/2010 1:26:18 PM PDT by bwc2221
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: trisham; Cicero; EternalVigilance; xzins; P-Marlowe

Brown waited until Kagan had already secured enough votes for confirmation before he announced this, that makes it a completely hollow gesture.


19 posted on 08/05/2010 1:33:27 PM PDT by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

He’s an empty suit.


20 posted on 08/05/2010 1:38:45 PM PDT by trisham (Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: trisham

He’s doing his best to make sure that Kerry likes him:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2564698/posts


21 posted on 08/05/2010 1:40:52 PM PDT by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: FrdmLvr

I think the way she treated the military recruiters at Harvard has something to do with it.


22 posted on 08/05/2010 1:42:22 PM PDT by Andy'smom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee
That's disgusting, I have to say.

Kerry is an arrogant fool. I happen to know that his "Do you know who I am?" is something that he actually does ask of people. Massachusetts is an extremely difficult place to be a conservative, and these two are perfect examples of why.

23 posted on 08/05/2010 1:49:09 PM PDT by trisham (Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: maddog55

Brown is an idiot for calling Kagan “brilliant”. What a moron.


24 posted on 08/05/2010 1:50:14 PM PDT by My Favorite Headache (Obama is Dangerclown The Manchild)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibLieSlayer

You’re right and he did.


25 posted on 08/05/2010 1:50:36 PM PDT by onyx (Sarah/Michele 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: maddog55

No doubt because he KNEW she was a lock to be confirmed!!!!


26 posted on 08/05/2010 2:00:26 PM PDT by Oldpuppymax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Andy'smom

The people of Mass. care about the military?


27 posted on 08/05/2010 2:20:45 PM PDT by FrdmLvr ( VIVA la SB 1070!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: maddog55

This vote is quite Romney-like. Wait until the deal is cinched, then vote against it to show he’s a conservative or whatever point he’s trying to make.

Also very Democrat- they jockey to see who gets to vote against a controversial bill when they are up for election.


28 posted on 08/05/2010 6:50:42 PM PDT by DBrow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: maddog55

A nothing votes nothing.


29 posted on 08/05/2010 6:51:13 PM PDT by bvw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: onyx

She should be hung... not confirmed. Good for Brown!

LLS


30 posted on 08/06/2010 4:20:16 AM PDT by LibLieSlayer (WOLVERINES!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson