Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ten Questions for freshly-zotted PDS trolls
Cogitamus (a real stinker of a liberal blog that this troll failed to link to)

Posted on 07/29/2010 8:32:38 AM PDT by 4everfree2001

Edited on 07/29/2010 8:51:39 AM PDT by Admin Moderator. [history]

Ten question for lame Palin trolls:

1) Do you always roll in MSM anti-Palin propaganda like a dog on a fresh meadow muffin?

2) Is your IQ really lower than your hat size?

3) Do you think barfing up nonsense like this will get you lucky with dippy hippy chicks?

4) Did that zot leave a mark?

5-10) You ain't worth the effort to come up with a full top ten list, adios, troll-breath.

TOPICS: Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: acornpaidforthis; assclown; clownposse; gayquestion; goodquestions; goofyquestion; hunterites; iatz; ibtz; idiotposting; loserposer; moronpost; moveonorgtroll; obot; opus; palin; palinoia; paulestinians; paulistaloswer; pds; romney4romney; romneybots; sarahpalin; sionnsar; sorosstoodges; trigtruther; troll; victorkilo; vk; worstopusever; zot; zuluoscartango
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-120 next last
To: 4everfree2001

Poor arguments. I don’t see any proof that Levi slept at the Palin home and you offer no proof.

Also, women never know exactly when their child will be born.

She did well under those circumstances.

21 posted on 07/29/2010 8:44:43 AM PDT by dforest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 4everfree2001

AHA...Rahm is trolling FR again, folks!

22 posted on 07/29/2010 8:44:50 AM PDT by klb99 (I now understand why the South seceeded)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 4everfree2001

Ever heard of “trusting in God?” She should have just aborted, right?

23 posted on 07/29/2010 8:44:53 AM PDT by goodnesswins (DEMOCRATS LOSE.....America WINS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 4everfree2001; 50mm; darkwing104

Might want to keep an eye downrange on this one. But put on your welding goggles so you’re not blinded by the flash in case the ZOT hits.

BTW, my answer is (c), you’re a troll.



24 posted on 07/29/2010 8:45:10 AM PDT by Moose4 (November 2, 2010--the day that "YES WE CAN" becomes "OH NO YOU DIN'T")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 4everfree2001

There is a difference between “leaking amniotic fluid” and your water breaking.

I leaked fluid with my second and was able to function for about 3 days before giving birth

My water broke with the first, and had him about an hour later.

25 posted on 07/29/2010 8:45:25 AM PDT by justsaynomore (Eventus stultorum magister)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: 4everfree2001

Why is any of this (and I don’t accept your phrasing of these questions, especially the ones involving her daughters, by the way) anyone’s business?

Why are liberals all about privacy as far as sexual and reproductive issues are concerned, EXCEPT when Sarah Palin is involved?

26 posted on 07/29/2010 8:45:51 AM PDT by JenB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MNJohnnie

You’ve accused me of lying, please tell me specifically where I have lied or provided inaccurate information.

My rational argument is that because of the points above, Sarah Palin is irresponsible and also unelectable.

27 posted on 07/29/2010 8:45:51 AM PDT by 4everfree2001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: 4everfree2001
Grow up! I know fabulous parents who: continued working while in labor and knowing she was at 9 cm until the contractions got to two minutes apart, became pregnant a third time when she already had two autistic children, left on a church missions trip to Africa while 8 months pregnant even though her previous birth had been C-section, and many who bring newborns to the office and to church when under a week old (this category includes me). By your standards all of us are bad parents. By my standards, all of us are great parents who stay that way throughout parenthood and raise kids who are not afraid to face life. Cringing at home in fear that something might go wrong if you go out into the world is how liberals live, and it's only if I set that example for my kids that I'd consider myself a bad parent.

Even if these challenges would overwhelm you, a lot of people handle far more. Sarah Palin seems to take this in stride and still be far more capable of handling the presidency than anyone I can think of. Like you (I assume from your attack on her), I'd like to find someone even better to support for 2012 to make sure we get rid of the anti-American socialist who has taken power in our country. Like you (I assume from the lack of a better suggestion in your post), I can't find anyone more capable of executing the duties of the President of the United States in accordance with our Constitution than Governor Palin.

28 posted on 07/29/2010 8:46:32 AM PDT by Pollster1 (Natural born citizen of the USA, with the birth certificate to prove it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 4everfree2001

Has your water ever broken?

Mine did, and I didn’t actually go into labor - they had to start me on Pitocin. And I could have walked around like that for ages if I’d wanted to.

29 posted on 07/29/2010 8:46:58 AM PDT by JenB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: 4everfree2001; narses; MHGinTN; neverdem


If you were one of Sarah Palin’s (raving, hate-filled) opponents, would you (a) celebrate murdering 43 million innocents since Roe v Wade, and want to kill another 4.3 billion around the world?

Or (b) fight to save just one more innocent life?

Sarah chose (b).

30 posted on 07/29/2010 8:47:28 AM PDT by Robert A Cook PE (I can only donate monthly, but socialists' ABBCNNBCBS continue to lie every day!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: 4everfree2001

Dear Ass Clown,

You swine. You vulgar little maggot. Don’t you know that you are pathetic? You worthless bag of filth. As we say in Texas, I’ll bet you couldn’t pour piss out of a boot with instructions on the heel. You are a canker. A sore that won’t go away. I would rather kiss a lawyer than be seen with you.

You are a fiend and a coward, and you have bad breath. You are degenerate, noxious and depraved. I feel debased just for knowing you exist. I despise everything about you. You are a bloody nardless newbie twit protohominid chromosomally aberrant caricature of a coprophagic cloacal parasitic pond scum and I wish you would go away.

You’re a putrescence mass, a walking vomit. You are a spineless little worm deserving nothing but the profoundest contempt. You are a jerk, a cad, a weasel. Your life is a monument to stupidity. You are a stench, a revulsion, a big suck on a sour lemon.

You are a bleating fool, a curdled staggering mutant dwarf smeared richly with the effluvia and offal accompanying your alleged birth into this world. An insensate, blinking calf, meaningful to nobody, abandoned by the puke-drooling, giggling beasts who sired you and then killed themselves in recognition of what they had done.

I will never get over the embarrassment of belonging to the same species as you. You are a monster, an ogre, a malformity. I barf at the very thought of you. You have all the appeal of a paper cut. Lepers avoid you. You are vile, worthless, less than nothing. You are a weed, a fungus, the dregs of this earth. And did I mention you smell?

If you aren’t an idiot, you made a world-class effort at simulating one. Try to edit your writing of unnecessary material before attempting to impress us with your insight. The evidence that you are a nincompoop will still be available to readers, but they will be able to access it more rapidly.

You snail-skulled little rabbit. Would that a hawk pick you up, drive its beak into your brain, and upon finding it rancid set you loose to fly briefly before spattering the ocean rocks with the frothy pink shame of your ignoble blood. May you choke on the queasy, convulsing nausea of your own trite, foolish beliefs.

You are weary, stale, flat and unprofitable. You are grimy, squalid, nasty and profane. You are foul and disgusting. You’re a fool, an ignoramus. Monkeys look down on you. Even sheep won’t have sex with you. You are unreservedly pathetic, starved for attention, and lost in a land that reality forgot.

And what meaning do you expect your delusionally self-important statements of unknowing, inexperienced opinion to have with us? What fantasy do you hold that you would believe that your tiny-fisted tantrums would have more weight than that of a leprous desert rat, spinning rabidly in a circle, waiting for the bite of the snake?

You are a waste of flesh. You have no rhythm. You are ridiculous and obnoxious. You are the moral equivalent of a leech. You are a living emptiness, a meaningless void. You are sour and senile. You are a disease, you puerile one-handed slack-jawed drooling meatslapper.

On a good day you’re a half-wit. You remind me of drool. You are deficient in all that lends character. You have the personality of wallpaper. You are dank and filthy. You are asinine and benighted. You are the source of all unpleasantness. You spread misery and sorrow wherever you go.

I cannot believe how incredibly stupid you are. I mean rock-hard stupid. Dehydrated-rock-hard stupid. Stupid so stupid that it goes way beyond the stupid we know into a whole different dimension of stupid. You are trans-stupid stupid. Meta-stupid. Stupid collapsed on itself so far that even the neutrons have collapsed. Stupid gotten so dense that no intellect can escape. Singularity stupid. Blazing hot mid-day sun on Mercury stupid. You emit more stupid in one second than our entire galaxy emits in a year. Quasar stupid. Your writing has to be a troll. Nothing in our universe can really be this stupid. Perhaps this is some primordial fragment from the original big bang of stupid. Some pure essence of a stupid so uncontaminated by anything else as to be beyond the laws of physics that we know. I’m sorry. I can’t go on. This is an epiphany of stupid for me. After this, you may not hear from me again for a while. I don’t have enough strength left to deride your ignorant questions and half baked comments about unimportant trivia, or any of the rest of this drivel. Duh.

The only thing worse than your logic is your manners. I have snipped away most of what you wrote, because, well... it didn’t really say anything. Your attempt at constructing a creative flame was pitiful. I mean, really, stringing together a bunch of insults among a load of babbling was hardly effective... Maybe later in life, after you have learned to read, write, spell, and count, you will have more success. True, these are rudimentary skills that many of us “normal” people take for granted that everyone has an easy time of mastering. But we sometimes forget that there are “challenged” persons in this world who find these things more difficult. If I had known, that this was your case then I would have never read your post. It just wouldn’t have been “right”. Sort of like parking in a handicap space. I wish you the best of luck in the emotional, and social struggles that seem to be placing such a demand on you.

P.S.: You are hypocritical, greedy, violent, malevolent, vengeful, cowardly, deadly, mendacious, meretricious, loathsome, despicable, belligerent, opportunistic, barratrous, contemptible, criminal, fascistic, bigoted, racist, sexist, avaricious, tasteless, idiotic, brain-damaged, imbecilic, insane, arrogant, deceitful, demented, lame, self-righteous, byzantine, conspiratorial, satanic, fraudulent, libelous, bilious, splenetic, spastic, ignorant, clueless, illegitimate, harmful, destructive, dumb, evasive, double-talking, devious, revisionist, narrow, manipulative, paternalistic, fundamentalist, dogmatic, idolatrous, unethical, cultic, diseased, suppressive, controlling, restrictive, malignant, deceptive, dim, crazy, weird, dystopic, stifling, uncaring, plantigrade, grim, unsympathetic, jargon-spouting, censorious, secretive, aggressive, mind-numbing, arassive, poisonous, flagrant, self-destructive, abusive, socially-retarded, puerile, clueless, and generally Not Good.

I Hope This Helps...

31 posted on 07/29/2010 8:47:28 AM PDT by MNJohnnie (The problem with Socialism is eventually you run our of other peoples money. Lady Thatcher)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Jemian

It looks like we have a Trig Truther here.

Anybody who would post a vanity like this is certified Rubber Room.

32 posted on 07/29/2010 8:47:30 AM PDT by Clyde5445 (Gov. Sarah Palin: :"You have to sacrifice to win. That's my philosophy in 6 words.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: 4everfree2001
Sarah Palin’s behavior was selfish, immoral, and dangerous. It does not speak well of her and does not seem to predict a promising national candidacy.

You are judge and jury for Sarah Palin?

I am really sure Lord is my judge and my jury. That has been well established. I am really sure Lord is Sarah's judge ,too.

33 posted on 07/29/2010 8:48:06 AM PDT by BARLF
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: 4everfree2001

At least we know where,when and to whom Sarah was born.....more than you can say for your guy.

34 posted on 07/29/2010 8:48:33 AM PDT by klb99 (I now understand why the South seceeded)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: 4everfree2001

So, all 10 of these questions go to the heart of the liberal talking point from the 2008 election: Mothers who don’t believe in abortion should not run for public office.

I see you signed up in 2008, I would think the quality of your arguments would have improved by now.

35 posted on 07/29/2010 8:49:08 AM PDT by Cyber Liberty (Build a man a fire; he'll be warm for a night. Set a man on fire; he'll be warm the rest of his life)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JenB

I am not a liberal. This is relevant because it reflects on her judgement and her “family values,” WHICH SHE HAS MADE A MAJOR PLANK OF HER PLATFORM.

She brought her baby to the convention and held him up to the cameras. She has made him an explicit part of her platform.

36 posted on 07/29/2010 8:49:34 AM PDT by 4everfree2001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: 4everfree2001

OK, fine. Who is your candidate? Who would you support in 2012? Specifics, please.

BTW, Palin would be near, possibly at, the top of my list, because of her stands on issues. Romney? No. Huckabee? Hell no. Newt? As an idea guy, I love him, as a candidate, he’d be a disaster far worse than you think Palin would be.


37 posted on 07/29/2010 8:49:34 AM PDT by Moose4 (November 2, 2010--the day that "YES WE CAN" becomes "OH NO YOU DIN'T")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: 4everfree2001
I am sorry but your claims are manufactured lies dreamed up by Jourolist propagandist in their attempt to smear Palin during the 2008 campaign. Your claims have no base in fact.

Nice you have feelings. Your feelings are not facts and do not excuse you to make up your own "facts" to self validate your emotion based opinions.

38 posted on 07/29/2010 8:51:30 AM PDT by MNJohnnie (The problem with Socialism is eventually you run our of other peoples money. Lady Thatcher)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Clyde5445
I think the ZOT9000 is warming up.
39 posted on 07/29/2010 8:52:38 AM PDT by JPG (Sarah Spitz? No, she swallowed the Obama agenda.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: 4everfree2001

I suggest you review Matthew 7: 1-3 and then review what you posed.

Pregnant women are not uniformly fragile, in fact few are fragile. Designating a preganacy as “high risk” requires one to measure and empirically define the risk to that mother and her child.

Your questions imply a prejudgement I doubt you are qualified to render. You impugn and judge without personal knowledge.

What does that make you?

40 posted on 07/29/2010 8:52:47 AM PDT by Blueflag (Res ipsa loquitur)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-120 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794 is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson