Posted on 07/27/2010 12:28:31 PM PDT by pissant
AS was bold to break from the girl-power pack and discount the idea of female wisdom as a universal solvent. She was bolder still to point out the value of risk-taking (which is more male) as a necessary complement to risk aversion (more characteristically female) in a banking industry.
I might only part company with AS here: To develop such rules-based systems will require the input of intelligent females as well as intelligent males.
I don't agree that the banking system necessarily requires female—or male—input to run well. It might bump along just fine with a female percentage of .00097, as it had in the past. What is crucial is—as Miss Schlaes points out—that the business be run logically. And the only way that's possible is if it's free from interference by governmental nannies, thugs, and idiots.
Why would you ask such a silly question?
Pro-Illegal Immigration, Amnesty Shales?
LOl!
She should stick to economic matters where she has at least demonstrated some competence.
http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=newsarchive&sid=aIVznKkyw5HE
How about wait until day after tomorrow?
You have quite a way with words.
Pretty much. Too many Phil Donahue types, even in the early 1900s
Hunter?
Don’t you get tired of beating that dead horse?
BTW Great man.....no chance in He!! of ever becoming President......Sorry pal time to face reality....
Wow. Deep.
Sounds like Original Sin.
That’s OK. There are a few other conservatives that I can support.
http://www.breckbrew.com/beer/lucky_u_IPA.html
Stupid women with a *thing* for black guys got us THIS prez.
and every other guy except Barney Frank.......
You're right. We should.
The 19th Amendment was a campaign of post-WWI, goofball egalitarianism. It ain't the women's fault. And it ain't married women who pull the "female" vote toward socialism and unicorn farts. Married women vote like married men. Too many unmarried women vote to spend other people's money on themselves. Individuals vary both ways, of course.
Liberty and good governance for all is the point, right? If you're interested in an electorate with a stake in the survival of society, male property owners are a probably a better sample than most. Ditto for married men and women. Meanwhile, at this point, I'd settle for "live citizens."
Thanks! I’ll look for it on my next trip to the beer store.
It is near perfect. Let me know if you find it
------------------------------------------------------------
"I am free of all prejudices. I hate every one equally".
"Hell, I never vote for anybody, I always vote against".
"A woman drove me to drink and I didn't even have the decency to thank her".
W. C. Fields
WC Fields was the best!
Obviously you've got to be retired (or unemployed or a federal government employee) as you seem to spend every waking hour scouring the earth for anything you can find to bash Sarah Palin.
I think your hatred of Palin even exceeds your hero worship of Duncan Hunter.
You know, you're pretty boring - even for a kook.
Bachmann is actually becoming fairly well known nationally as she is on TV a lot and active with the Tea Party.
Hunter has even been forgotten in his former congressional district and the 600 watt radio stations he gives interviews to don't cover much area.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.