Sean Hannity Show,"LET FREEDOM RING!",M-F,3PM-6PM,EDT,WABCAM,June 29,2010

Sean Hannity Show ^ | June 29, 2010 | Biggirl

[Biggirl]

Welcome To The Sean Hannity Show Thread! All Posters And Lurkers Are WELCOME! The Show Thread Between EL Rushbo And TGO'S Lounge. Be The First To Post And Win A Sean Hannity Show Thread High Power Blender. Listen To Sean Do Comentary, Talk To Guests And Take Calls From YOU! :)=^..^=

Anoucement: Thursday I will post a Sean Hannity Show thread for both Thursday and Friday. Since it will most likely be a best of Monday, as the July 4th holiday is extended, NO thread will be posted. Thank-you. :)=^..^=

[Biggirl]

Good Afternoon and welcome to the "conservative witness" with Sean Hannity. :)=^..^=

[MarkLevinFan]

Yhello! Yhello! Yhello!

[Biggirl]

Giant Sean Hannity Show Thread PING LIST!:)=^..^=

Please let me know if you want either on or off the PING LIST!:)=^..^=

THANKS!:)=^..^=

[Biggirl]

Congrats to MarkLevinFan for winning the Sean Hannity Show Thread High Power Thread for June 29,2010. :)=^..^=

[MarkLevinFan]

Thank me! ;-)

[Biggirl]

I am glad ANYONE shows up on this thread. This thread DOES NOT get a lot of action time. I know it is summer, even the giants Rush and Mark, threads have been lean as of late, but Sean’s almost does not exist. Will post tomorrow for Wednesday and will do a special Thursday/Friday thread. Thanks once again for the visit MLF!:)=^..^=

[Biggirl]

“Conservative resistence”.

[hattend]

Sean, please no more Gore. Who gives a flying fig?

Put a nuke down the hole? Are you kidding me? What happens when the nuke creates cracks in the seabed and we get 2 or 3 times the leakage

F’n Clinton. Don’t you have a dress to stain at Gore’s house?

[MarkLevinFan]

I used to love this thread, but a while back it was being constantly attacked by people posting for the purpose of disrupting. I tried to fight back, but got chastised by the FR Administrator.

[Eagle of Liberty]

Two interesting definitions:

Declarationism

For the Declarationist, the essence of the creation of Men as equals is not only those "unalienable Rights" but the inseparability of equal responsibilities linked to each one of those rights.

Legal positivist

The legal positivist would assert that only the law can establish any rights and no responsibilities come with rights unless also provided by the law, usually in the form of punishment rather than duty.

[Eagle of Liberty]

Obama, FDR, the Constitution, and Rights (written Nov 4, 2008)

Earlier this year, in “The Next Great Depression,” I noted several parallels between the political economy of the early 1930s and today. Another intriguing parallel between then and now is the striking similarities between Barack Obama and Franklin Delano Roosevelt.

Furthermore, a President Obama, having expressed a preference for judges who can see things from the personal perspective of the poor, the gay, the old, of ethnic minorities, instead of administering impartial justice, would appoint federal judges and Supreme Court justices who interpret the Constitution creatively. In doing so, he might appear to be the second coming of FDR, who sought to pack the Supreme Court with justices like Chief Justice Charles Evans Hughes, whose constitutional philosophy was “the constitution means whatever the Supreme Court says it means.”

What is the import of Obama’s philosophy? How radical is it?

Obama’s philosophy of law is called “legal positivism.” It refers to using the law to build a “great society” from the top down. In reality, it is simply another term for “central planning” or “social engineering.” It is the favored ideology of those who believe that government power is primary and individual rights are expendable in the pursuit of the greater good of the collective. Many countries experimented with legal positivism in the 20th century, and those unfree societies were uniformly depressing places for the common citizen.

[Eagle of Liberty]

From the link:

Under positive law, you can be put in jail for not doing what you are ordered to do; that is, you conceivably could be deemed a criminal while sitting at home minding your own business.

[Eagle of Liberty]

The Next Great Depression (written Feb 8, 2008)

The defenders of FDR (who, though they will deny it, are also defenders of Hoover, because economic illiteracy is bipartisan and both presidents embarked on parallel paths of massive government interventions) claim that the Great Depression was caused by market failures. What nonsense! This is like blaming someone for dying if you shoot him. The tragedy of the 1930s is that markets weren’t allowed to work. First Hoover, then FDR, caused massive economic dislocations through repeated federal interventions. The Great Depression was a case of government failure (a distant cousin of the decades-long depression in the centrally planned Soviet economy), not market failure.

[Eagle of Liberty]

“Stop Spending. Stop Spending. Stop Spending. STOP SPENDING!!!”

[rightwingintelligentsia]

None of the talk show threads are what they used to be. (sigh!)

[hattend]

We’re all out looking for work. No longer sitting at a desk FReeping and looking out the window

Okay, that’s my story anyway. LOL!

[ReneeLynn]

This guy and his small nuke, and no blaming Obama and agreeing with Clinton gives me the creeps. Yeah, it’ll turn the stone to glass. What else will it do?

[ReneeLynn]

I’m tellin’ ya, it’s a little too clique-y on the Rush thread.

[hattend]

This guy saying govt and BP should have listened to him about nuking the gulf

I say, why are we listening to an investment banker about nuking the gulf?

Prayer rug my ass

[Just Lori]

{{{{{{{{{{{{{{{HATMAN}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}}