Posted on 06/28/2010 5:07:11 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
Well... thanks for the confirmation ... LOL ...
There ya go ... :-)
Its like the national enquirer. Often I hear stuff on C2C that I hear about weeks later in the main stream. But, you have to take everything with a grain of salt. Ian Punit on the weekends tends to be a little less extreme.
I listen to the podcasts when i jog. It keeps me amused.
I would think that is because the stuff you were washing off was part of the topsoil that was eroded out thousands of years ago, not millions.’
I would imagine that the delta pumps out a few inches of that stuff every year. Its not bedrock, but just sedimentary crap that has not fused entirely yet.
A nuke would push it around a bit, but it wouldn’t fuse it or collapse it.
People think that everything is solid because they live on rocks.
That, and they put in a provision that were not allowed to post info from Alex Jones.
All in good fun :)
*puts tinfoil hat on* abiotic oil exists. bursting one of these bubbles could produce apocalyptic consequences. a nuke would prolly do that.
Yes it is. My question is why schools only teach that oil is fossil fuel?
But I think I know the answer - a replentishing oil supply does not fit into their view of the world. They want everyone to think we will run out of oil and must move to a “green” world.
Why is it so hard to accept the possibility of abiotic oil (besides the political consequences and enviromental dogma, of course)?
Humans have little idea what happens miles below the Earth’s crust and its quite possible that the heat/pressure are the source of basic organic chemicals. If anything, dead dinosaurs and plants starting at the surface and finding their way down to 40,000 feet below the surface is even more far-fetched.
Note also that NASA has found huge lakes of frozen propane and methane on Saturns moons. There are no dead dinosaurs there....
Yes indeed ... we have to have a little fun here ... :-)
The government has done such a good job producing idiots in our school systems. They have brainwashed them to be content with the little information they are taught and no longer teach children how to learn and that striving for knowledge is noble and should be an ongoing process through life.
I sent a few co-workers (IT folks) an article on abiotic oil a couple weeks ago and they were shocked that they had never been taught the theory. I think most had no trouble believing it and felt it made more sense.
Those EMP articles we see here on FR every few months or so.
i KNOW. i LEARNED THIS FROM A nAT gEO PRGRAM i THINK. iT IS INTERESTING THAT HEAT AND PRESSURE PLUS DEPTH WILL PRODUCE SUCH A VITAL COMPONENET
Did they teach you about the caps lock key?
Williams, a minister with no scientific or technical expertise, claims to have special insider knowledge about the oil industry based on personal contacts forged during the building of the Alaska oil pipeline three decades ago. So, with Williams’ sources and evidence withheld, how am I or anyone else supposed to refute his claims except to point out the inherent implausibility of an oil well blowout being a “planet killer?”
ping abiotic oil
As bad as this even is locally, it is not a planet killer. Not even close. There have been bigger leaks, and no one really remembers them.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.