Replies

Perhaps this court would allow them to be inside the building with a bolt-action hunting rifle but this might not be the best logistical position. "Basketball, anyone?"

So build a little thatched roof on a 2x4 frame. Shazam, not only do you have shade, but now you're inside the building. Probably get a ticket from code compliance for a non-compliant addition, but it should still be part of the building from a firearm enforcement standpoint. Just pay the ticket and take it down after the riots.

My biggest problem is whether or not the Supreme Court can catch-up with America and the issues we face today. Their decisions seem rooted in the past and with all of their deliberations, society suffers at the hands of an antiquated decision-making body.

OK, Chicago can't ban a handgun in the home, I get it, but nothing about protecting yourself outside your home, or what regulations/fees/licenses S-holes like Chicago can impose on gun owners. These issues are for a later date- if they come up at all.

Meanwhile, gangbangers, thieves, robbers, and crooked politicians continue unabated. All for want of an armed populace who could persuade said miscreants to change their ways or choose another career. Since the court will never be able to catch up, we get to live with the consequences and must act on our own. Carried by six, or judged by twelve is our only resort.