Posted on 06/28/2010 7:07:22 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
Beck like his buddy O’Reilly has “seen” the one’s BC. He “ain’t no” conservative. He is an entertainer.
It's also obvious to their potential market. The entire operation was sold for a 1 million bucks not too long ago because nobody buys the things.
” I think that the unique political culture of America means that European-style totalitarianism would have a much tougher time gaining ground here.”
How can that be if Pelosi, Reid and Obama decide to shove it through Congress in the night of during a recess and, if it doesn’t win, “deem” it “passed”?
I appreciate what Beck does, and am so grateful that he doesn’t waste one minute on the idiotic BC issue.
“the as-yet amorphous Tea Party movement must lead with free-markets and small-government”
Excellent idea. I’m for it. But has the author (Daniel Foster?) forgotten that a Muslim Socialist sits at our controls pushing any button that suits him (arbitrarily declaring statutes out of his mouth and taking the ax to free market enterprises, large and small, one by one) - and he still has over two years of this to go. And Congress supports him and calls anybody who disagrees a “smart a__”. And the media fawn over him.
BECK is a Patriot of the highest order ,,,, he may be entertaining if you agree with him and his prespective , but if you’re a member of the regime right now you’re not laughing . Beck is the bamster’s TRANSPARENCY CZAR .
That was the Vice President I quoted at the last there, not Congress.
I agree 110%.
“Whatever you think of Theodore Roosevelt”
Beck mention FDR, not Teddy. Hello!
Mark for later reference and retrieval.
Mon.,Jun 28, 2010- A day that will live in glory. (SCOTUS ruling).
Let me state that despite my detestation of the Birchers (having once been one), it is certainly undeniable that the Hamiltonian tradition has been radicalized. The Eastern Liberal Establishment was, after all, once the Conservative Eastern Establishment, but now its foundations support the most radical ideologies and ideologues. Furthermore the loss of Hamiltonian conservatism has made conservatism a Jeffersonian monopoly. Ironically, in his day Jefferson was considered a dangerous radical.
Perhaps the Right should make an effort (however Quixotic it may appear) to appeal to the Old Hamiltinians and bring them back. They were conservative once; they could conceivably become so again. At any rate, to write them off while making appeals to the ACLU and anarchists is the height of hypocrisy.
"Socialism is Communism sold by the drink."
--P.J. O'Rourke
Sure...Plessy v. Ferguson...even though Plessy was a 7 to 1 decision, it was overturned
He was created by the secret power cabals to be unleashed as their Frankenstein monster and Manchurian Candidate to impose this agenda, even whooping up the hysteria of the fake Swine Flu pandemic for his handlers and benefactors just last year. The Frankfurt School and glad-handing secret society wackos at Harvard Law programmed this kook who is now bankrupting the country. Watch for their next attempt to impose a dangerous, experimental, population control vaccine on the public. That there is now a systematic campaign to try to deny these obvious and provable facts as the mere "theory" of fringe Mormon writers and neurotic Princeton historians shows you how panicked the globalist elite and their secret society stooges have become by the embarrassing disasters of their presidential puppet in his second year of Alinskyite cognitive dissonance and narcissistic dissociation )which have raised the eyebrows of even the most centrist psychotherapists and mainstream liberals). Make no mistake, they mean to destroy the American economy, impose Fabian Socialism, and depopulate you and several billion other human beings on this planet.
"Most of us believe socialism is what the socialists want us to believe it is - a share-the-wealth program. That is the theory. But is that how it works?... If one understands that socialism is not a share-the-wealth program, but is in reality a method to consolidate and control the wealth, then the seeming paradox of super-rich men promoting socialism becomes no paradox at all. Instead it becomes the logical, even the perfect tool of power-seeking megalomaniacs. Communism, or more accurately, socialism, is not a movement of the downtrodden masses, but of the economic elite." - Gary Allen, None Dare Call It Conspiracy
The original Jeffersonian model - a nation of practically government-free agriculturalists living in blissful isolation from the problems of the outside world - was always a backward-looking ideal.
Few Jeffersonians realize the inherent tension between this classic caricature of Jeffersonianism and the real-life Jefferson who was an excited advocate of the statist and centralizing French Revolution.
Hamilton's program: a pro-business federal government with a modern military, active engagement in international affairs and a diverse economy retains not only its appeal, but its practicality - while the Jeffersonian model is a pre-industrial idyll and the Rooseveltian model's ultimate fate has recently been illustrated in Greece.
True, but my point was that the old Hamiltonian East Coast Establishment, at some point, made a sharp left turn, outflanking its populist opponents and leaving conservatism as a Jeffersonian monopoly.
Do you think the old Hamiltonian East Coast Establishment can be appealed to or salvaged in any way?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.