Skip to comments.
Joe to Joe (Biden was involved in Sestak matter)
American Spectator ^
| 6/1/10
| Washington Prowler
Posted on 06/01/2010 5:43:51 AM PDT by randita
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-29 next last
Surprised, anyone?
1
posted on
06/01/2010 5:43:52 AM PDT
by
randita
To: Tribune7
Biden - the gift that just keeps on giving.
2
posted on
06/01/2010 5:44:19 AM PDT
by
randita
(Visit keyhouseraces.com for a list of vulnerable DEM and must hold GOP House seats.)
To: randita
I hope people will have a long enough memory about this to pick up today where it left off on Friday.
3
posted on
06/01/2010 5:46:12 AM PDT
by
Genoa
(Luke 12:2)
To: Owl_Eagle; brityank; Physicist; WhyisaTexasgirlinPA; GOPJ; abner; baseballmom; Mo1; Ciexyz; ...
So much for Sestak and honor.
4
posted on
06/01/2010 5:46:21 AM PDT
by
Tribune7
(It is immoral to claim the tea parties to be racist)
To: randita
Although he was Delaware’s Senator for 36 years, in 2008, you would have thought he spent his entire life in Scranton, PA.
He deserves everything he has coming. One of the most hypocriticsal liberals ever to inhabit the planet.
Democrats are corrupt, communists, hate America and are the enemies of freedom.
Any questions?
5
posted on
06/01/2010 5:48:33 AM PDT
by
exit82
(Democrats are the enemy of freedom. Sarah Palin is our Esther.)
To: randita; Admin Moderator
Sestak isn’t a Popular Keyword today. Are we moving on??
6
posted on
06/01/2010 5:51:23 AM PDT
by
Genoa
(Luke 12:2)
To: randita
I heard someone on FNC say “It’s not the crime, it’s the coverup”. Bwah!
7
posted on
06/01/2010 5:52:04 AM PDT
by
McGruff
(So how is that Hopey Changey thingy working out for ya America?)
To: Genoa
Stupid question probably, but how can you see that information?
8
posted on
06/01/2010 5:52:18 AM PDT
by
riri
To: riri
Index page, sidebar on the right.
http://www.freerepublic.com/tag/*/index
9
posted on
06/01/2010 5:54:12 AM PDT
by
Genoa
(Luke 12:2)
To: randita
I hope Slow Joe wasn’t involved. If both he and Obama are impeached and convicted, Nancy Pelosi becomes president. That would be a nightmare.
10
posted on
06/01/2010 5:55:41 AM PDT
by
keepitreal
( Don't tread on me.)
To: randita
After that, Rendell made it known that he was working behind the scenes to cut off Sestak's in-state fundraising resources from major donors to the party. Nice. [/s]
So far, though, in what I've been able to glean, the ONLY action in this whole matter that can actually be put into the *politics as usual* category. This thing stinks to high heaven ... and it's only a matter of time before Sestak proves he is the weakest link in the chain.
To: keepitreal
We wouldn't see an impeachment until January anyway, by which time I think there will be a Republican Speaker.
12
posted on
06/01/2010 5:58:13 AM PDT
by
Genoa
(Luke 12:2)
To: Genoa
True. Republican speaker. Need more coffee!
13
posted on
06/01/2010 5:58:58 AM PDT
by
keepitreal
( Don't tread on me.)
To: Genoa; riri
I have no idea how it works. Some things that ARE on it are hard to fathom.
14
posted on
06/01/2010 6:01:36 AM PDT
by
Genoa
(Luke 12:2)
To: randita
Too bad those pesky VOTERS decided who would be their candidate, not the party kingmakers....
15
posted on
06/01/2010 6:03:04 AM PDT
by
GQuagmire
( We are no longer Massholes)
To: randita
Someone should be starting a betting pool on how many times Biden and friends can change their stories. (Clearly, I assume more than once by using the plural.)
16
posted on
06/01/2010 6:04:17 AM PDT
by
pointsal
To: MozarkDawg
...wasn't there a Friday afternoon press release saying "no story here"?
Why am I dubious?
17
posted on
06/01/2010 6:06:13 AM PDT
by
pointsal
To: keepitreal
What makes you think that a little ol’ thing like impeachment will make either one of those two leave office?
18
posted on
06/01/2010 6:11:21 AM PDT
by
CAluvdubya
((I'm thinkin'...))
To: randita
What did Joe know and when did he know it?
19
posted on
06/01/2010 6:17:33 AM PDT
by
csvset
To: pointsal
...wasn't there a Friday afternoon press release saying "no story here"?Why am I dubious?
Hmm ... perhaps because Sestak was contradicting the *official story* just a few short hours after it was put out??
(I guess the lawyer-brother didn't quite get the details straight in that phone call ...)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-29 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson