Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Even as Obama tried to miraculously plug a hole a mile deep in the Gulf by having a press conference defending the government's slooooooooow response and by visiting the Gulf Coast to pick up tar balls and explain his administration's methodical approach to screwing things up, now comes his underwhelming explanation for why a bribe offered to Joe Sestak was not a bribe.

After months of innocently gathering all the 'facts', the White House chaps now claim they tried to bait Sestak into not running for the U.S. Senate with the irresistible lure of service on an irrelevant panel without pay and that this enticing job offer wasn't a bribe because the position is unenticing, unpaid and because ballerina dancer Rahm Emanuel used a conduit to offer the bribe.

According to the White House's just-released thorough review of itself, morally upright and ethical Bill Clinton innocently approached Sestak last year to discuss tempting "options of service" on an "advisory board" if he agreed to eschew the Senate race. Clinton: Don't run for Senate and you'll enjoy the lavish trappings of a dream job on an obscure board without compensation!

The White House's story is so unconvincing that the media are convinced it's true! According to the diligent press which hasn't been on top of this story for months, the allegation of misconduct involving a job offer to Sestak in exchange for his dropping out of the race is 'thoroughly' 'refuted' by a memo confirming a job offer to Sestak in exchange for his dropping out of the race. White House: It took us February, March, April and most of May to offer up our innocent little story. And this is not damage control. Trust us!

White House counsel Robert Bauer's memo claims nothing improper happened because no White House staff was used to make the job proposition since the proposition was made by White House staff through Bill Clinton.

Liberals insist this self-serving conclusion from a discredited 'investigation' somehow exonerates the White House because (a) the White House conducted the 'investigation' and (b) a White House bribe isn't a bribe if the White House uses an outside emissary or fixer to offer the bribe, which would only make it a criminal conspiracy. See? All innocent. Relax.

Liberals scream that this is Washington, this kind of stuff goes on all the time, relax, no big deal, grow up, man. In the next breath, libbies affirm belief in the cock-and-bull tale the White House concocted -- a volunteer position without pay on some snore-fest advisory board was all that tiny dancer Rahm dangled to buy off a Congressman seeking a U.S. Senate gig.

University of Virginia honcho Larry Sabato insists that nothing improper happened, just "garden variety politics," and that he's "too old and cynical" to be shocked by any of this totally 'proper' conduct and believes the White House's fairy tale completely. Liberal Fox News analyst Lis Wiehl says she doesn't understand why the White House took so "long in coming out with this memo from Bauer" and "I don't understand why they didn't come out with it sooner," but believes every word in it is true. Really? The memo says the White House spent two months trying to get Sestak to back out. But Sestak said in his presser he chatted with Clinton only once about Rahm's job offer and touched on it briefly at that. Even after the heads-up Sestak's brother got from the White House to get everybody to parrot Bauer's cooked-up alibi, Sestak gave the game away by going clumsily off script with that itty-bitty discrepancy. Only chatted once with Clinton about a job? Memo says June and July. Who else did you chat with about a job you're highly ineligible for? (President's Intelligence Advisory Board gigs aren't open to sitting Congressman under current rules.)

And what about the gig on USAID offered to you by Obama's deputy chief of staff Jim Messina? Oops, hold on -- that's another bribe, this one a failed effort to buy off Andrew Romanoff from a primary run against U.S. Sen. Michael Bennet. Sorry. Hard to keep all this totally 'above board' and 'proper behavior' straight.

Anyway, that's...
My Two Cents...
"JohnHuang2"

1 posted on 05/29/2010 12:51:17 AM PDT by JohnHuang2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last
To: Forgiven_Sinner; xm177e2; mercy; Wait4Truth; hole_n_one; GretchenEE; Clinton's a rapist; buffyt; ...

Saturday morning ping!


2 posted on 05/29/2010 12:51:58 AM PDT by JohnHuang2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JohnHuang2

The only problem is that in an early press interview about this, a reporter named Kane asked Sestak whether he had been offered a job by someone IN the White House. Sestak said YES>. The part about Bill Clinton has been made up in recent days to “save the Dem party.” He wasn’t IN Obama’s White House.


5 posted on 05/29/2010 12:56:38 AM PDT by browniexyz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JohnHuang2

According to another thread, the ‘volutary position’ is one Sestak isn’t even eligible to hold!


6 posted on 05/29/2010 12:58:36 AM PDT by SatinDoll (NO Foreign Nationals as our President!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JohnHuang2
...libbies affirm belief in the cock-and-bull tale the White House concocted -- a volunteer position without pay on some snore-fest advisory board was all that tiny dancer Rahm dangled to buy off a Congressman seeking a U.S. Senate gig.

I think the Tooth Fairy story is more believable.

9 posted on 05/29/2010 1:46:12 AM PDT by Yaelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JohnHuang2

On target and right between the eyes!


10 posted on 05/29/2010 1:58:23 AM PDT by Enterprise (Katrina was rough. The BP blowout is Katrina on steroids. Deal with it libs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JohnHuang2
Today, Kane threw another wrench in the works, telling National Review Online the White House originally denied there was any offer.

He recalled asking for confirmation of Sestak's statement.

"When the White House finally called back, they denied it," he told NRO. "Strategically, the White House press person I spoke with said Sestak's statement 'was not true.' So I pressed: Was anything, at all, dangled? She repeated that all she could say was that Sestak's words 'were not true.'"

Lie, lie, lie!

11 posted on 05/29/2010 1:58:28 AM PDT by TigersEye (0basma's father was a British subject. He can't be a "natural-born" citizen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JohnHuang2
The memo says the White House spent two months trying to get Sestak to back out. But Sestak said in his presser he chatted with Clinton only once about Rahm's job offer and touched on it briefly at that.

Can't get their stories straight.

13 posted on 05/29/2010 2:03:52 AM PDT by TigersEye (0basma's father was a British subject. He can't be a "natural-born" citizen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JohnHuang2

We are a Nation of Laws*.

(*unless you are a Democrat Politician)


15 posted on 05/29/2010 2:21:56 AM PDT by Kickass Conservative (Obama, proving Hillary right that it takes a Village Idiot.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JohnHuang2

For you attorneys out there...Isn’t this one of those surrogate/alter ego situations? If Emanuel is Obama’s alter ego, anything he does would be as if it’s done by Obama.


16 posted on 05/29/2010 4:04:20 AM PDT by ryderann
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JohnHuang2
Well said, JohnHuang2!
17 posted on 05/29/2010 4:16:56 AM PDT by srmorton (Deut. 30 19: "..I have set before you life and death, blessing and cursing;therefore choose life..")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JohnHuang2

bttt!!!!


20 posted on 05/29/2010 4:31:54 AM PDT by Guenevere (....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JohnHuang2

Isn’t Bob Bauer Obama’s personal attorney that sealed his school records, from an FOIA, Then was given White House counsel job just when the ACORN scandal broke.


22 posted on 05/29/2010 4:40:54 AM PDT by opentalk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JohnHuang2
Don't worry John.

The State Conrolled Media is ALL OVER this story! They will leave NO STONE unturned to find something! I heard there are over 1,000 reporters assigned to this!




Oh wait......different story.......never mind......

24 posted on 05/29/2010 4:43:26 AM PDT by SkyPilot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JohnHuang2

Excellent write up, John. I’m curious as to your rhetorical bend on the “high crimes and misdemeanors” going on in DC. We have a President who’s supposed to be leading and taking responsibility for EVERYTHING happening in our nation, yet he cherry picks his issues, those that are most politically expedient and convenient to him. Is it your opinion that the WH is using strongarm tactics through Rahm, et al. to surreptitiously push away the press from the bete noire issues while Obama acts as the “good cop,” if you will, to bring attention to those that bolster his presidency?

My take on this is that Obama is gallivanting around the country for himself while Rahm is acting as a giant shield covering his backside from attacks from the Republicans and the media. It’s downright frightening how effective one man has become in shuffling issues off into a dark dusty corner of the media market. There’s no legal accountability, no fait accompli, no responsibility for any issue that would tarnish “the One’s” reputation.

I often wonder if this is how the Left saw Rove, but at least Rove was honest.


26 posted on 05/29/2010 5:14:45 AM PDT by rarestia (It's time to water the Tree of Liberty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JohnHuang2

BTTT


28 posted on 05/29/2010 5:21:49 AM PDT by varon (Allegiance to the constitution, always. Allegiance to a political party, never.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JohnHuang2
"The White House's story is so unconvincing that the media are convinced it's true!"

YUP! Big surprise there ha? The result of the Lame Stream Media's mass consumption of the anointed ones Kool-Aid!

29 posted on 05/29/2010 5:48:13 AM PDT by dokmad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JohnHuang2
Partial Clinton time line...
Feb. 4, 2010 - conference call with House Democratic leaders to tout the passage of pay-as-you-go legislation
Feb. 5, 2010 - In Haiti as UN envoy
Feb. 11-15 2010 - Heart surgery
Feb. 11-17, 2010 (?) - conference call/meeting to coordinate a push-back to the burgeoning tea party movement (Breitbart)
Feb. 21, 2010 - Good Morning America/Major Garrett interviews
Feb. 24, 2010 - UC Berkeley Global Citizenship - speech

Any help greatly appreciated.

30 posted on 05/29/2010 6:10:41 AM PDT by philman_36 (Pride breakfasted with plenty, dined with poverty, and supped with infamy. Benjamin Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JohnHuang2

Next they will have to flood the fake news with a red herring.


31 posted on 05/29/2010 6:13:43 AM PDT by bmwcyle (NJ Governor Chris Christie for Pr sident)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JohnHuang2
Oops...
Sestak says federal job was offered to quit race
After yesterday's taping, Sestak said he recalled the White House offer coming in July, as he was preparing to formally announce his Senate candidacy in August.
Have to go back to June/July 2009.
34 posted on 05/29/2010 6:35:40 AM PDT by philman_36 (Pride breakfasted with plenty, dined with poverty, and supped with infamy. Benjamin Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: JohnHuang2
tiny dancer Rahm

Bwaahahahah!!

41 posted on 05/29/2010 7:27:52 AM PDT by Cyber Liberty (Build a man a fire; he'll be warm for a night. Set a man on fire; he'll be warm the rest of his life)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson