Posted on 05/14/2010 11:33:50 AM PDT by Nachum
"We're talking about tens of thousands of pages," says Susan Cooper, spokeswoman for the National Archives and Records Administration. "It's a massive job."
Cooper is discussing the work of processing papers from Supreme Court nominee Elena Kagan's two years, 1995 and 1996, in the Clinton White House Counsel's Office. During that time, Kagan, like any overworked staff lawyer, handled a wide variety of issues and wrote or contributed to thousands of memos, e-mails and other documents. Those papers, boxes and boxes of them, are at the Clinton Presidential Library in Little Rock, under the supervision of the archives.
(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonexaminer.com ...
bttt
In her Senior Thesis at Princeton, Elena Kagan aligns herself with ‘radicals for change’ and ‘socialists’
From David Horowitz’s
FrontPageMag.com/DiscoverTheNetworks.org
PROFILE: ELENA KAGAN
Served as President Bill Clinton’s Associate White House Counsel
Former dean of Harvard Law School
Sought to overturn the Solomon Amendment, a law that denies federal funding to any university that bars military recruiters from its campus
Believes that the military should open its ranks and barracks to homosexuals, without restriction
Was appointed U.S. Solicitor General by President Barack Obama in January 2009
As an undergraduate at Princeton, Kagan wrote a senior thesis titled
“To the Final Conflict: Socialism in New York City, 1900-1933.”
In the “Acknowledgments” section of her work, she specifically thanked her brother Marc, whose involvement in radical causes led me to explore the history of American radicalism in the hope of clarifying my own political ideas. In the body of the thesis, Kagan wrote:
“In our own times, a coherent socialist movement is nowhere to be found in the United States. Americans are more likely to speak of a golden past than of a golden future, of capitalisms glories than of socialisms greatness. Conformity overrides dissent; the desire to conserve has overwhelmed the urge to alter. Such a state of affairs cries out for explanation. Why, in a society by no means perfect, has a radical party never attained the status of a major political force? Why, in particular, did the socialist movement never become an alternative to the nations established parties?...
“Through its own internal feuding, then, the SP [Socialist Party] exhausted itself forever and further reduced labor radicalism in New York to the position of marginality and insignificance from which it has never recovered. The story is a sad but also a chastening one for those who, more than half a century after socialisms decline, still wish to change America. Radicals have often succumbed to the devastating bane of sectarianism; it is easier, after all, to fight ones fellows than it is to battle an entrenched and powerful foe. Yet if the history of Local New York shows anything, it is that American radicals cannot afford to become their own worst enemies. In unity lies their only hope.”
Lots more on Kagan here:
http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/individualProfile.asp?indid=2398
bttt
Just the idea of it being supressed is enough not to confirm her. If the Republicans want to be a part of the coverup; they will soon find out they will be out of office.
Let’s not have a replay of the Clinton years where a rapist President was impeached and did not leave office. I blame the Republicans for assisting in that coverup. Why is it right for Nixon who was impeached to leave office and not Clinton?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.