Posted on 05/10/2010 12:54:59 PM PDT by speciallybland
Whatever crazy.
Rand was endorsed by Jim DeMint, Sarah Palin, Dr. James Dobson, Steve Forbes, and Jim Bunning.
Paul wins all conservatives, church goers, gun owners, social conservatives and remains a consistent 15 points ahead of Trey (Bill Clinton/Romney Trey).
The only Republicans that Grayson has won is the pro-choice Republicans, all that sounds pretty solid to me.
I like him. BTW, he is neither and truther or a birther.
And Palin is backing Carly Fiorina, too. I couldn't care less who or what she supports anymore.
I notice you’re making snippy remarks to established FReepers.
You must be a Paulbot.
Boo-hoo.
Palin saved us from Trey Grayson, and she is trying to save us from Tom Campbell.
Christine Whitman just endorsed the front runner, and the guy that has been winning the race all along, Tom Campbell.
Tom Campbell is the guy winning the race easily, that is why Palin jumped in here at the last minute. Absentee voting started today.
During the campaign for U.S. Senate in 2000, Campbell touted his 100 percent pro-choice voting record. He opposed a ban on partial birth abortions, one of the most horrific abortion practices. (Conservatives Agonize Backing Campbell, Roll Call, August 7, 2000.)
Campbell in 1992 made abortion the center stage of his campaign. In the 1992 election, Campbells TV ad ran with the following caption: For choice, for jobs, for U.S. Senate. In another ad, he said, Im pro-choice and one of the most conservative members of Congress when it comes to spending.In a Republican debate, he described his abortion views, as good for voters looking for someone who is willing to break with the party line from time to time. (Gerry Braun, Herschensohn Wont Pledge to Back GOP Pick; Senate Opponents Renew Acrimony in Last Debate, San Diego Union Tribune, June 1, 1992.)
Herschensohn, for his part, described Campbell exactly as he is during that debate: I dont believe a Republican has to pass a litmus test, (but) I feel that Tom Campbell is so far away from the Republican umbrella that it would be easier to run against a Democrat. . .
Yeah, she’s saving us from J.D Hayworth too. What a gal.
When does she hit the campaign trail for Kokesh?
Yep...you’re definitely a Paultard. LOL
Are you just an endless supply of short whines?
Why not make an effort to sell Trey Grayson to us?
Because I don’t a damn about Trey Greyson, troll. My concern is the Pauls and their travelling truther freakshow.
LOL, you are the one trolling, with meaningless, childish, emotional outbursts.
In the Senate race between Trey Grayson and Rand Paul, you want Kentucky voters to choose the man that is widely perceived as being too liberal, Trey Grayson.
You haven’t made any case for why conservatives, gun owners, pro life voters, church goers, should all shift their support to the ex Bill Clinton supporter, currently Romney supporter, Trey Grayson.
If you want people to vote for him, then you need to sell him some.
How would you explain to pro-military conservatives Rand Paul’s support for a left-wing antiwar activist who believes the U.S. government had a hand in bringing down the World Trade Center?
I don’t know about that other race and candidates.
In the Senate race between Trey Grayson and Rand Paul, you want Kentucky voters to choose the man that is widely perceived as being too liberal, Trey Grayson.
You havent made any case for why conservatives, gun owners, pro life voters, church goers, should all shift their support to the ex Bill Clinton supporter, currently Romney supporter, Trey Grayson.
If you want people to vote for him, then you need to sell him some.
You haven’t made any case for why pro-military conservatives should support Rand Paul, in light of his support for a left-wing antiwar activist who believes the U.S. government had a hand in bringing down the World Trade Center.
If you want to make a phony claim of Rand being a truther, you will have to do better than that.
Conservative voters of Kentucky are not buying your man Trey.
Adam Kokesh is a truther. Rand Paul is supporting him.
For a nomal, sane person, that would be a non-starter for endorsing a candidate. Not so for the Paul kid. I wonder why?
Yeah, I’m going to have to go with Paul, too. We just don’t have any other choice. Grayson is a democrat in republican clothing. I just can’t vote for Trey.
Look, if you have something you want to tell us, tell us, I’m not interested in spending the next week researching to find out what you are trying to say.
Give us the full tale of your conspiracies and connections between various politicians and political races and the Kentucky Senate race.
Tell everyone why you think that Trey Grayson will make a more conservative Senator.
Why did Jim Demint, and Jim Bunning endorse Rand Paul?
You needn't spend a week researching. A moderately resourceful person could find everything they need to know about Kokesh and RandRon Paul's support for him in about five minutes (10 minutes with a dial-up connection).
Why DeMint, Bunning, Palin, Dobson et al chose to endorse him is a question for them, not me. Endorsements don't move me, facts do. And the facts are, Rand Paul supports Adam Kokesh... and that says a lot about Rand Paul and the Cult of Paul itself. They're fellow travelers with the hard, anti-America left.
But if you must have links, here's a start:
Adam Kokesh: An anti-war smear merchant in Republican clothing
9/11 Families Reject Adam Kokesh as a Serious Candidate for Congress
Adam Kokesh: An Open Statement Concerning his candidacy
INTERVIEW WITH MCCAIN HECKLER ADAM KOKESH. (Admits that Ron Paul delegate gave him a pass)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.