Is she or isn't she? Let's ask her (Kagan and lesbianism)

American Family Association ^ | May 10, 2010 | Bryan Fischer

[mcshot]

Ah Yes I remember the threat that one’s “johnson” would be tied to a foot locker with a 10 foot rope and thrown out a second floor barracks window. No worries here but it was a chilling story.

[OafOfOffice]

I don’t think it is right to ask her if she is a lesbian. Just ask her if she is heterosexual.

Perfect!

[massmike]

read later

[Mrs. Don-o]

Elena Kagan's sexual orientiation, gay or straight, is irrelevant, as is her short hair and sometimes menacing look. What we must object to, among other things, is her barring military recruiters from Harvard because she felt that the military's "Don't ask, don't tell" policy was "a profound wrong -- a moral injustice of the first order." (Link)

If a man were nominated to the Supreme Court who was straight, a husband and father, a member of a Chjristian congregation, a Military veteran, and a good-looking and congenial guy --- but had that same attitude opposing "Don't ask/don't tell" --- I'd oppose him.

If a short-haired scowling apparently-not-heterosexual woman SUPPORTED "Don't ask/don't tell" I might well support her.

What matters is the ideology. And the most dangerous lefty-ideologues are the ones who look like us.

[Responsibility2nd]

In other words, what a person does in the privacy of their own bedroom is none of our concern?

BS. Total unadulterated BS.

Besides, who here wants a return to DA/DT?

That is unacceptable BS too.

[Nevermore]

Don't ask, don't tell - PLEASE!
The last thing we need is a homosexual martyr nominee.

[Mrs. Don-o]

There are all kinds of vices which, while we despise them, have no necessary impact on the performance of a public trust. Violations against chastity and sobriety, for instance ---quite unaggressively, privately, and off the job --- bother us inasmuch as the fate of the persons' eternal soul is concerned, but have negligable relevance to the function of a judge.

The essential virtue needed in every judge, though, is an exact and firm sense of justice. And here Kagan fails. Kagan thinks "discrimination against gays and lesbians" is inherently morally wrong and an injustice. She apparently is blind to the fact that open homosexual conduct is incompatible with military decorum and discipline, and that sexual deviants should not be put in proximity with squads of young men(or women), let alone be in a chain of command. So no, I'm not going to demand to know with whom, or in what way she satisfies whatever sexual appetite she may or may not have.

And yes, I do want to keep the whole gay agenda out of the military.