Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

IT'S ILLEGAL TO BE ILLEGAL
boblonsberry.com ^ | 04/28/10 | Bob Lonsberry

Posted on 04/28/2010 5:52:11 AM PDT by shortstop

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-33 last
Comment #21 Removed by Moderator


22 posted on 04/28/2010 7:21:42 AM PDT by whd23
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SMARTY
ENOUGH!!!!

We the people, have allowed the importation of poverty every since the USA passed the last ever amnesty bill in 1986. Ted Kennedy's own words

Ted Kennedy on the 1986 Simpson-Mazzoli Bill, Quote: "This amnesty will give citizenship to only 1.1 to 1.3 million illegal aliens. We will secure the borders henceforth. We will never again bring forward another amnesty bill like this." End of Quote.
23 posted on 04/28/2010 7:37:34 AM PDT by Cheerio (Barack Hussein 0bama=The Complete Destruction of American Capitalism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: FrankR
Even in so-called open immigration countries such as Canada, they have reasonable controls. My brother once worked for the U.S. office of a Canadian company which wanted to transfer him to the home office in Toronto for a project which was supposed to last about eight months before they transferred him to their Japan office for his next assignment.

It took them three months to secure a visa for an eight month project, which he ended up completing in six months. They had to first prove they couldn't find a Canadian to do the job.

24 posted on 04/28/2010 8:27:41 AM PDT by Vigilanteman (Obama: Fake black man. Fake Messiah. Fake American. How many fakes can you fit in one Zer0?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: shortstop
"The law must have meaning, because when it doesn't, we are the ones who lose."

Ah, would that anything in life worked that way. In fact the law has no meaning because the Communist Party treats the law as a stick to beat the law abiding with, while all current or even just prospective Party Members can ignore it with impunity. And not just on this issue, on every issue. The Communist Party considers itself above the law, which it considers its instrument for ruling the non-members and nothing else.

And as long as half the country continues to operate that way, there is no law. Don't kid yourselves, that is where we are.

"When we ignore law, when we turn against the will of the people it represents"

Would that the people were so united and had any will to speak of. They do not. They are divided, leaderless, gullible. They give hardened Communists the benefit of every doubt and just want to get along with men who hate them and want to grind their faces into the sand.

"we turn loose a capricious tyranny that one day may come back to haunt us all."

It's loose. Wake up.

25 posted on 04/28/2010 10:11:23 AM PDT by JasonC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: shortstop; SierraWasp; tubebender; Ernest_at_the_Beach; Liz; BOBTHENAILER

My wife has been anti illegals for over a decade.

Unlike our two sons and I, who are very outspoken about this issue, she refuses to get into esoteric discussions and labeling.

She uses the word illegal to describe those who came into this country illegally and stay in it illegally.

This simple word drives the PC liberals even more insane.


26 posted on 04/28/2010 10:13:06 AM PDT by Grampa Dave (Use your $'s as weapons! Boycott Gay Frisco, since they keep Pelosi in congress.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 1_Inch_Group; 2sheep; 2Trievers; 3AngelaD; 3pools; 3rdcanyon; 4Freedom; 4ourprogeny; 7.62 x 51mm; ..

Ping!


27 posted on 04/28/2010 10:17:43 AM PDT by HiJinx (~ Illegal is a Crime, it is not a Race ~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: shortstop

Dubya, Rove, McCain, and the rest of the GOP’s No Borders Compassion Lobby couldn’t figure out what “illegal” means.


28 posted on 04/28/2010 1:59:30 PM PDT by Pelham (Obamacare, the new Final Solution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kabar

Very good and informative. I had been told this. It seems as though Obama and the Democrats along with the MSM are trying to stir up a racial confrontation and make as though it is white folks doing it. White America had better come to its senses and see we are being attacked by the Democrats. This could very well be another Waco on a bigger scale.


29 posted on 04/28/2010 2:03:56 PM PDT by RocketRoland
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: RocketRoland
LOL. It has nothing to do with race. 54% of Hispanics self-describe themselves as white. Hispanics/Latinos come in all races. And the reality is that there is no such ethnicity as Hispanic or Latino. This is all about identity politics.

Since the 1965 Immigration Act, our pro-population growth immigration policies have fueled major demographic changes in a very short period of time. In 1970, non-Hispanic whites comprised 89 percent of the population; today they are 66 percent; and by 2042, they will be 50 percent. The Democrats, under the banner of multiculturalism and diversity, have forged a political coalition that depends on individuals coalescing around racial and ethnic identities rather than the issues. The continuing and increasing flow of minority immigrants, mostly poor and uneducated, provide a natural constituency for the Democrats, which see them as their principal source of political power.

The Democrats [and some Republicans] have been successful in branding conservatives who want the rule of law enforced against illegal aliens and reduced levels of immigration as nativists, racists, and xenophobes. Citing the old saw that the United States is a nation of immigrants and using anecdotal, but by no means representational, examples of immigrants being mistreated, they deploy emotion and invective to intimidate and isolate the opposition. According to the Democrats, the Republican Party is comprised of old white men who are racists and revanchists bent on returning us to pre-Civil War days.

The irony is that immigration can be a winning issue for Republicans. Our views on immigration actually coincide with those of the majority of the American people. We need not be apologetic or defensive. Republicans must be more proactive and less reactive. They must be willing to take a principled stand on the issue even if it means polarization, being the object of demagoguery, and short-term political losses. Unless Republicans redefine the battlefield and terms of engagement, they will continue to lose the war.

The Republican strategy on immigration should be based on the core principles of the party, i.e., national security, limited government, the rule of law and the Constitution, and individual responsibility. Immigration is an issue that cuts across partisan lines. There are plenty of independents and Reagan Democrats who are affected adversely by immigration and hold far different views than the Democrat political leadership, union bosses, religious leaders, etc. Republicans need to articulate their message better to tap into those constituencies. That said, pandering and outreach to minorities don’t work. Republicans lose when they try to play identity politics against the Democrats and it just reinforces their framing of the issue. Republicans must appeal to the interests of the individual voter with a universal message regardless of race, ethnicity, or gender.

30 posted on 04/28/2010 2:27:14 PM PDT by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: shortstop

I find the timing of this law very interesting. I wonder how many illegals will be counted in the census...before they are sent back to ol’ Mexico.

Financially this could be really good for the State of Arizona.


31 posted on 04/28/2010 2:28:18 PM PDT by proudpapa (Proudpapa)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kabar
Could be encouraging. Just go through reading where the FBI Agent in charge of the investigation of the Militia in Michigan could not give facts at the bond hearing. Says the Judge is even confused. I do not know what is going on in t6his country but it isnt good.
32 posted on 04/28/2010 2:54:31 PM PDT by RocketRoland
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Liz

Liz, very well stated. One more benefit is “Voting.”
They can vote, no one checks to verify they are citizens or have the right to vote.


33 posted on 04/28/2010 6:41:31 PM PDT by Jennikins (It matters not what we want, as we are being ruled, not governed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-33 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson