Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Evangelists claim Noahs Ark Found
World Net Daily ^ | April 27, 2010 | Joe Kovacs

Posted on 04/27/2010 9:29:08 AM PDT by marstegreg

This story contains much more information and additional photos than The Sun.

(Excerpt) Read more at wnd.com ...


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: antitheism; artifacts; dropthebong; fundienutcases; noahsark; religiousintolerance; religiouskookalert
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-85 next last
Comment #1 Removed by Moderator

To: marstegreg

Can some one help me post the photos from this article?


2 posted on 04/27/2010 9:30:55 AM PDT by marstegreg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marstegreg

3 posted on 04/27/2010 9:35:27 AM PDT by Dubya-M-DeesWent2SyriaStupid!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: NoObamaFightForConservatives

Thanks :)


4 posted on 04/27/2010 9:36:53 AM PDT by marstegreg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: marstegreg


5 posted on 04/27/2010 9:40:31 AM PDT by fso301
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marstegreg

Everybody should already know the ark was found in Wales. At least that’s what I think it said in a previous Sun article. /s


6 posted on 04/27/2010 9:41:30 AM PDT by Matchett-PI (Jim Wallis speaks for Christians the same way that Jesse Jackson speaks for all blacks.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: fso301

Obama is calling in a missile strike as we speak ...


7 posted on 04/27/2010 9:42:30 AM PDT by Scythian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: marstegreg

Helen Thomas: “ahh, memories...”


8 posted on 04/27/2010 9:42:52 AM PDT by reagan_fanatic (America needs Obama-care like Nancy Pelosi needs a Halloween mask)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Another comedy thread:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2501453/posts?page=50#50


9 posted on 04/27/2010 9:43:02 AM PDT by Matchett-PI (Jim Wallis speaks for Christians the same way that Jesse Jackson speaks for all blacks.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: marstegreg

Here is a link to the Sun article.

http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/news/2949640/Noahs-Ark-found-in-Turkey.html

I remember years ago this being on the net news when they found it. Now that they have evidence what will the atheists say now?


10 posted on 04/27/2010 9:43:15 AM PDT by Dubya-M-DeesWent2SyriaStupid!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Scythian

Probably. He will order it to be be demonized Saul Alinsky style; cuz crazy ‘right wingers’ are making the claim.


11 posted on 04/27/2010 9:45:50 AM PDT by Dubya-M-DeesWent2SyriaStupid!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: fso301

They found a wood structure. Remind me again how that makes it the Ark? It couldn’t possibly be an old monastery or anything else?

Look - my house is made of wood! It must be Noah’s Ark!


12 posted on 04/27/2010 9:49:11 AM PDT by bolobaby
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: NoObamaFightForConservatives

It certainly looks old. Judging by the one photo in the article where it is encased in ice, it looke like it has been there for a long, long time. Any geologists out there have an oponion based on the photos?


13 posted on 04/27/2010 9:50:24 AM PDT by marstegreg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: marstegreg

Evangelists claim (again) Noahs Ark Found


14 posted on 04/27/2010 9:53:14 AM PDT by Grunthor (Over YOUR dead body!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marstegreg
I've heard of these stories for years and you never know what may have been found until the site has been fully excavated.

Several such prior "discoveries" of hewn wood and wooden structures turned out to be assorted hut's and shrines built high in the mountains.

Even if it turns out to be a boatlike structure made of gopherwood and pitch, that doesn't mean it was Noah's ark. It may have been a shrine built on-site by some local leader.

15 posted on 04/27/2010 9:55:06 AM PDT by fso301
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fso301
Never gave it much thought before, but it would make sense that the wood would of been salvaged and used for dwellings, tools, boats, and maybe even fortifications by Noah and his decendents. You would think little of the original ship would remain intact where it came to rest.
16 posted on 04/27/2010 9:55:28 AM PDT by NavyCanDo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: bolobaby
They found a wood structure. Remind me again how that makes it the Ark?

Agreed. See my post #15.

17 posted on 04/27/2010 9:56:48 AM PDT by fso301
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: fso301

I know it’s a stretch, but I want more info before I decide.


18 posted on 04/27/2010 9:58:56 AM PDT by marstegreg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: marstegreg

So, has anyone mentioned what type of wood was used in building this structure?


19 posted on 04/27/2010 10:00:49 AM PDT by LucyJo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bolobaby

“Remind me again how that makes it the Ark? It couldn’t possibly be an old monastery or anything else?”

The article clearly states, “The group of archaeologists ruled out an established human settlement, explaining one had never been found above 11,500 feet in the vicinity.”

My guess is that they believe it’s the ark because it is said to have rested in the mountains of Ararat not your front yard.

Are they right? Who knows, but it’s much more interesting than your flip response would suggest.


20 posted on 04/27/2010 10:01:05 AM PDT by Leonard210 (Tagline? We don't need no stinkin' tagline.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: marstegreg

Carbon dating puts it at 2800 B.C. Works for me.


21 posted on 04/27/2010 10:01:06 AM PDT by Genoa (Luke 12:2)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marstegreg

More information? O.K., What about the brass plate that said, “Made by Noah’s Ark Works, Ararat”.


22 posted on 04/27/2010 10:04:34 AM PDT by count-your-change (You don't have be brilliant, not being stupid is enough.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: marstegreg

Forget the Ark, there should also be evidence of the world flood, and all the animals returning to land in one place - however many thousands of species of vertebrates...


23 posted on 04/27/2010 10:04:58 AM PDT by Egregious Philbin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LucyJo

They said some of the wood-like rocks they tested proved to be petrified wood.

I think since the wood has already become petrified, it may not be so easy to say what kind it was, but I’m only guessing.


24 posted on 04/27/2010 10:07:30 AM PDT by marstegreg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: LucyJo
So, has anyone mentioned what type of wood was used in building this structure?

I don't believe so. It may just be a whole lot of shittim.

25 posted on 04/27/2010 10:08:43 AM PDT by Ken H
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: fso301

Fair enough.... but if it’s a more-or-less single structure that’s at least a football field long, that probably qualifies.


26 posted on 04/27/2010 10:09:30 AM PDT by alancarp (Please don't tell Obama what comes after "trillion")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Leonard210

“The group of archaeologists ruled out an established human settlement, explaining one had never been found above 11,500 feet in the vicinity.”

Until today.

That statement contains the WORST logic I’ve ever heard. No Ark had ever previously been found in the vicinity EITHER. So, by their own logical constructs, it’s not an Ark either.

Do you see?


27 posted on 04/27/2010 10:10:15 AM PDT by bolobaby
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: reagan_fanatic
Helen Thomas: “ahh, memories...”

You owe me a keyboard. I'll never get the coffee out of this one.

MM (in TX)

28 posted on 04/27/2010 10:11:24 AM PDT by MississippiMan (http://gogmagogblog.wordpress.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Genoa

Except any creationist will tell you carbon dating is bunk. (Unless it supports what they want it to support - then it’s sound science.)


29 posted on 04/27/2010 10:11:58 AM PDT by bolobaby
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: marstegreg

I find it and interesting story regardless of the out come.


30 posted on 04/27/2010 10:12:50 AM PDT by Parley Baer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marstegreg

FYI I just received this...I have received this from a third party so I cannot state that this is actually from Dr. Price.

Dear Friends,
Many of you have seen the preliminary news announcement of an alleged discovery of Noah’s Ark by a Chinese expedition team and asked me for clarification. I knew this was coming and have been praying about how to respond.

I was the archaeologist with the Chinese expedition in the summer of 2008 and was given photos of what they now are reporting to be the inside of the Ark. I and my partners invested $100,000 in this expedition (described below) which they have retained, despite their promise and our requests to return it, since it was not used for the expedition. The information given below is my opinion based on what I have seen and heard (from others who claim to have been eyewitnesses or know the exact details).

To make a long story short: this is all reported to be a fake. The photos were reputed to have been taken off site near the Black Sea, but the film footage the Chinese now have was shot on location on Mt. Ararat. In the late summer of 2008 ten Kurdish workers hired by Parasut, the guide used by the Chinese, are said to have planted large wood beams taken from an old structure in the Black Sea area (where the photos were originally taken) at the Mt. Ararat site. In the winter of 2008 a Chinese climber taken by Parasut’s men to the site saw the wood, but couldn’t get inside because of the severe weather conditions. During the summer of 2009 more wood was planted inside a cave at the site. The Chinese team went in the late summer of 2009 (I was there at the time and knew about the hoax) and was shown the cave with the wood and made their film. As I said, I have the photos of the inside of the so-called Ark (that show cobwebs in the corners of rafters - something just not p! ossible in these conditions) and our Kurdish partner in Dogubabyazit (the village at the foot of Mt. Ararat) has all of the facts about the location, the men who planted the wood, and even the truck that transported it.

To my knowledge, the Chinese took no professional archaeologist or geologist who could verify or document the wood or the structure in situ (in its place of discovery). They were duped in 2006-2007 by Parasut when they were shown a similar cave with something they thought was wood. I met the Chinese when I went with a team of geologists to examine the “wood” in Dogubabyazit and to report that it was volcanic rock (called “tuff”) and not wood. Thereafter, since the Chinese were apparently able to get permits to climb in previously off-limit sites, I and two other professionals joined with the Chinese (bringing our own independent satellite data) and went with them to Mt. Ararat in 2008. During that expedition, the guide Parasut who claimed to have found the Ark, was constantly drunk and after one month sitting in a hotel waiting, the expedition never happened. It was at this time that I made contact with Dr. Richard Bright who has climbed Mt. Ararat 33 times in sea! rch of the Ark and with several others climbed the western side of Mt. Ararat with a shepherd (who had recently been discovered by Dr. Bright’s Kurdish partner) who knew the location of a piece of the Ark. Last year we had a good expedition to a higher site (the satellite site) and this summer we will excavate the shepherd’s site and have every reason to expect success.

I am sorry to have to report that this is apparently a fake (and I am sure that the Chinese do not know this, but they do not respond to my e-mails), however, we do hope soon to have the real thing.

I encourage your prayers for me and others who will have to explain this “discovery” to many others - because negative reports are never well received and motives are questioned, especially when those doing so are part of a competitive expedition. But we do not want people to reject the truth of the Bible because another Noah’s Ark report turns out to be false. We prefer to as clear upfront in our reporting as possible so Christians (and others) can make up their own minds.

I hope that this will be helpful to you at this time,

Randall Price
Archaeologist
Ark Search LLC Expedition
World of the Bible Ministries


31 posted on 04/27/2010 10:14:28 AM PDT by surfer (To err is human, to really foul things up takes a Democrat, don't expect the GOP to have the answer!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Leonard210; bolobaby
"archaeologists ruled out an established human settlement, explaining one had never been found above 11,500 feet"

How do the facts it was found above known human settlement on Mt. Ararat and not bolobaby's front yard make it the ark?


32 posted on 04/27/2010 10:15:02 AM PDT by I see my hands (_8(|)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: marstegreg

Copyright restrictions apply downthread as well.


33 posted on 04/27/2010 10:18:25 AM PDT by Admin Moderator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: marstegreg; evets
2 Peter 3:3-7
34 posted on 04/27/2010 10:18:37 AM PDT by anniegetyourgun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Admin Moderator

Copyright restrictions apply downthread as well.

I’m sorry, I thought I did everything right. Please explain so that I don’t do it again.


35 posted on 04/27/2010 10:21:50 AM PDT by marstegreg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: marstegreg

Excerpt-only content is subject to the 300-word limit. Posting the rest of the article downthread (in poster’s comment box) violates the limit. Thanks.


36 posted on 04/27/2010 10:24:50 AM PDT by Admin Moderator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: reagan_fanatic

..as she walked down the gang plank with the other hippo...


37 posted on 04/27/2010 10:25:08 AM PDT by Tulsa Ramjet ("If not now, when?" "Because it's judgment that defeats us.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv

Noah’s Ark found (?) ping.


38 posted on 04/27/2010 10:25:11 AM PDT by rdl6989 (January 20, 2013- The end of an error.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: surfer

Thanks for posting the letter, my mind would have been speculating for days!


39 posted on 04/27/2010 10:26:14 AM PDT by marstegreg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Admin Moderator

Thanks, I did not know that. I will refrain in the future. :)


40 posted on 04/27/2010 10:27:11 AM PDT by marstegreg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: bolobaby
They found a wood structure. Remind me again how that makes it the Ark? It couldn’t possibly be an old monastery or anything else? Look - my house is made of wood! It must be Noah’s Ark!

It is unlikely to be an old monastery or anything of the sort. I think general scientific consensus would be that a human would have great difficulty surviving at that altitude, and the idea that humans could have exerted the physical energy to build such a structure at such a height is considered outside the realm of possibility. (Not to mention the effort of getting wood to those heights - I don't believe trees can grow at anything near those altitudes). So they have a large wooden structure that most likely was not built on site and could not have been moved to the site by humans. That would lead one to believe it arrived at it's current placement through an unusual natural occurence (such as a flood). After that it is a leap of faith to say it is "Noah's Ark" - but it is certainly a extraordinarily unusual discovery. But unless they find a to-do list in Mrs. Noah's handwriting -smile- we are left with something extraordinarily unusual that COULD be explained by the story of The Flood. Or Martians could have dropped it there.

My money would go on The Flood explanation. -smile-

41 posted on 04/27/2010 10:27:15 AM PDT by In Maryland ("Impromptu Obamanomics is getting scarier by the day ..." - Caroline Baum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: bolobaby

>> Except any creationist will tell you carbon dating is bunk. (Unless it supports what they want it to support - then it’s sound science.) <<

All facts are bunk, but some facts are less bunk than others....


42 posted on 04/27/2010 10:27:24 AM PDT by GraceG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Grunthor

Jesus himself could come down in a cloud and warn people and they would want scientific proof and CNN would say we were all right wing whackos that created it.


43 posted on 04/27/2010 10:29:11 AM PDT by Dubya-M-DeesWent2SyriaStupid!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: bolobaby
It couldn’t possibly be an old monastery or anything else?

At a 12,000 foot altitude? On that utterly barren mountain?

I dunno. Sounds like an unlikely place to build a monastery, even if you wanted a remote location. The top of Mt. Ararat might as well be Mars.

I'd like to see some detailed drawings/photos of the layout of that structure to get a better sense of what it might have been.

44 posted on 04/27/2010 10:36:48 AM PDT by Windflier (To anger a conservative, tell him a lie. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: marstegreg

Welcome, thanks for your understanding.


45 posted on 04/27/2010 10:38:28 AM PDT by Admin Moderator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Egregious Philbin

I have seen seashells in caves up high in the Rocky mountains. I wonder how they got there.


46 posted on 04/27/2010 10:42:15 AM PDT by Clump (the tree of liberty is withering like a stricken fig tree)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: surfer
"I and my partners invested $100,000 in this expedition (described below) which they have retained, despite their promise and our requests to return it, since it was not used for the expedition."

Uh huh...

47 posted on 04/27/2010 10:43:26 AM PDT by Windflier (To anger a conservative, tell him a lie. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: bolobaby

Carbn dating is fine for objects younger than 50,000 years old. Beyond that it is crap.


48 posted on 04/27/2010 10:45:15 AM PDT by Clump (the tree of liberty is withering like a stricken fig tree)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: reagan_fanatic

Helen Thomas: “ahh, memories...”

Which animal was she? The Hippo?


49 posted on 04/27/2010 10:50:24 AM PDT by Hayzo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Clump

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geology_of_the_Rocky_Mountains


50 posted on 04/27/2010 10:51:08 AM PDT by ColdWater ("The theory of evolution really has no bearing on what I'm trying to accomplish with FR anyway. ")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-85 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson