Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Police raid Gizmodo editor's home
Tech Fortune at CNN.com ^ | April 26, 2010 5:37 PM | Philip Elmer-DeWitt

Posted on 04/26/2010 4:17:17 PM PDT by Smogger

Cops break open front door and seize computers in investigation of lost iPhone prototype.

It looks like the police are taking this pretty seriously.

Armed with a search warrant, members of California's Rapid Enforcement Allied Computer Team broke into a private home Friday night and seized computers and other electronic equipment, according to a report posted Monday on Gizmodo.

The home belonged to Jason Chen, the Gizmodo editor who published photographs and videos of a top secret prototype iPhone left at a bar by a young Apple engineer. Gizmodo has admitted paying $5,000 for the device, which it turned over on request to Apple (AAPL), but only after cracking it open and publishing details about its parts and specifications.

It's not clear at this time whether Apple or the local district attorney initiated the investigation. Apple has not replied to a request for clarification.

The search warrant, signed by a San Mateo County Superior Court judge, said the equipment seized may have been used to commit a felony.

"My wife and I drove to dinner and got back at about 9:45," begins Chen's description of the event. "When I got home I noticed that the garage door was half open, and when I tried to open it, officers came out and said they had a warrant to search my house and any vehicles on the property 'in my control.' Then they made me place my hands behind my head and searched me to make sure I had no weapons or sharp objects on me."

Photocopies of the warrant and a list of the equipment seized (including one box of business cards for "suspect chen") are available here. Chen's full statement below the fold.

(Excerpt) Read more at tech.fortune.cnn.com ...


TOPICS: Front Page News; News/Current Events; Technical
KEYWORDS: apple; gizmodo; iphone
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180 ... 221 next last
To: SmokingJoe
If I drop a banknote on the street while taking something from my pocket(and I have), I know I'll never see the money again(and I don't), and whoever finds it, is probably going to keep it.

Yes, but if you dropped your $3,000 laptop on the street while taking something from your briefcase, are you seriously suggesting that you'd also never expect to see it again? Wouldn't you think that someone would have turned it in to the local police department if they were unable to find or reach you, rather than selling it to someone who would then dismantle it?

What's more, unlike $5 bills, cell phones are registered to a cellular network which is capable of identifying their general location, if not their exact GPS location.

141 posted on 04/27/2010 8:27:18 AM PDT by mvpel (Michael Pelletier)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 131 | View Replies]

To: 1rudeboy
It's not a “meme,” idiot

No?
You are the same guy that kept coming up with one idiotic analogy after another, no?

And your panties are in a twist because you can't respond to it other than to call be an “Applebot”

Naaah,
I'll leave the panty wearing to effeminate Applebots like you. Fits you to a “T”.

“”I found this gun and called S&W repeatedly, but . . . .””

There you go with one of your idiotic memes again.
Again, shooting someone at random with a gun is a crime, whether you own the gun or not. Get it?

142 posted on 04/27/2010 8:34:26 AM PDT by SmokingJoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 140 | View Replies]

To: SmokingJoe
Again, shooting someone at random with a gun is a crime, whether you own the gun or not. Get it?

Much like selling property that you do not have clear title to . . . thanks, again.

143 posted on 04/27/2010 8:36:40 AM PDT by 1rudeboy (You don't even know what a "meme" is, just admit it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 142 | View Replies]

To: mvpel
Yes, but if you dropped your $3,000 laptop on the street while taking something from your briefcase, are you seriously suggesting that you'd also never expect to see it again? Wouldn't you think that someone would have turned it in to the local police department if they were unable to find or reach you, rather than selling it to someone who would then dismantle it?

You mean that, if you call the laptop's manufacturer and some low-level functionary blows you off, the laptop doesn't magically become yours?
/retard

144 posted on 04/27/2010 8:39:37 AM PDT by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 141 | View Replies]

To: 1rudeboy
There, there . . . that is the reason you're upset, I know. Can you see me next week? We can talk about it some more. The Apple Gestapo won't bother you

You know what?
You are right. The Apple Gestapo won't bother me, cause I never use any Apple products, nor do I have any intention of ever using any Apple product ever.

So the Apple phone was stolen the moment the other guy found it on the barstool”

Nope.
The Apple phone was left behind by the Applebot. The Applebot(or his representatives) refused to take the phone back when the guy who found the phone tried to return the phone.
But hey, why should Apple worry about taking their phone back when they can always send the Gestapo to go break down doors eh? Much, much more civilized that way, I am sure. /sarc

145 posted on 04/27/2010 8:41:44 AM PDT by SmokingJoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 140 | View Replies]

To: 1rudeboy
Much like selling property that you do not have clear title

Naaaah.
Much like stealing US nuclear secrets (according to you) and selling them to Iran. Hey, bring in the FBI. /sarc

146 posted on 04/27/2010 8:48:09 AM PDT by SmokingJoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 143 | View Replies]

To: SmokingJoe

The nuclear secrets weren’t stolen. They were left on a barstool. This is precisely where you go into mental vapor-lock.


147 posted on 04/27/2010 8:52:04 AM PDT by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 146 | View Replies]

To: SmokingJoe
You are right. The Apple Gestapo won't bother me, cause I never use any Apple products, nor do I have any intention of ever using any Apple product ever.

They sure as hell are bothering you HERE! LOLOL

Man, just let it go.

148 posted on 04/27/2010 8:53:31 AM PDT by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 145 | View Replies]

To: 1rudeboy
Nuclear secrets were neither stolen, nor left in a bar. And Apple smartphone is no US nuclear secret. It's not even as good as some of the Adroid smartphones that are out already.
149 posted on 04/27/2010 8:54:55 AM PDT by SmokingJoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 147 | View Replies]

To: 1rudeboy
They sure as hell are bothering you HERE!

Yeah?
I don't see no jack booted Apple Gestapo breaking down any doors of mine. On the other hand, I am gonna be looking forward to this trial with glee, and so will Apple's rivals in the smart phone business.

150 posted on 04/27/2010 8:58:04 AM PDT by SmokingJoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 148 | View Replies]

To: SmokingJoe
And Apple smartphone is no US nuclear secret.

Keeping in mind your admission that you never use, nor have any intention of using, Apple products--if you found one on a barstool you'd understand that it does not belong to you, yes? And calling Apple Customer Care will not make it so, yes? And that is different from a nuclear blueprint how, again?

151 posted on 04/27/2010 9:01:15 AM PDT by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 149 | View Replies]

To: 1rudeboy
Keeping in mind your admission that you never use, nor have any intention of using, Apple products—if you found one on a barstool you'd understand that it does not belong to you, yes?

I have no interest whatsoever in any Apple phone, that's the point. It'd be like me seeing a stone in a bar.

And that is different from a nuclear blueprint how, again?”

Nuclear blueprints can lead to rogue countries and terrorists getting nuclear weapons and slaughtering millions. Apple smartphone “secrets” can't kill anybody. Huge difference. Next?

152 posted on 04/27/2010 9:08:40 AM PDT by SmokingJoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 151 | View Replies]

To: SmokingJoe

This is how I can tell that I’m arguing with a woman. You never finish your point. Granted, Apple’s iPhone (or whatever this thing was) cannot kill anyone (yet): is that the reason you are allowed to turn centuries of property law on its head?


153 posted on 04/27/2010 9:12:17 AM PDT by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 152 | View Replies]

To: 1rudeboy
This is how I can tell that I’m arguing with a woman

You would if you are arguing with another effeminate Applebot.
This happens to be a red blooded, Windows user. Sorry.

You never finish your point.”

You never had any point.

Granted, Apple’s iPhone (or whatever this thing was) cannot kill anyone (yet): “

Some Apple smartphone is not even on the same planet as US nuclear secrets. Foolish analogy.

is that the reason you are allowed to turn centuries of property law on its head?”

No property law has been violated. The owner left his product somewhere. The finder repeatedly tried to return it. The owner refused to accept his property back.

154 posted on 04/27/2010 9:19:42 AM PDT by SmokingJoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 153 | View Replies]

To: LibertyRocks
One of the most interesting copyright cases involved an enforcement action by IRS ~ and then a glom on by a state taxing authority who wanted a piece of the money too.

Since working my way through that case I've never doubted that copyright law is one of those things that EVERYBODY can enforce.

Congress has even enabled private parties to bring suits to recover alleged damages.

Remember, the Constitution gives Congress the authority to secure for a limited time, and boy do they, and to "help" they have allowed all and sundry to jump on board to beat down the competition.

Copyright process, as distinct from the law, is a regular old dog _____.

155 posted on 04/27/2010 2:36:44 PM PDT by muawiyah ("Git Out The Way")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: Swordmaker

Don’t know how many of the lost iPhone threads are around, but here is another one ... :-)


156 posted on 04/27/2010 2:43:43 PM PDT by Star Traveler (Remember to keep the Messiah of Israel in the One-World Government that we look forward to coming)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah

Do you seriously think that folks from Chicago say the word ignorant sounding like, “Ignant”??? Have you EVER even been to Chicago? Chicagoans do NOT speak like that... In fact, the national broadcast journalist enunciation most closely resembles the “Chicago accent”.

Besides, that was just uncalled for...


157 posted on 04/27/2010 2:56:54 PM PDT by LibertyRocks (http://libertyrocks.wordpress.com ~ Anti-Obama Gear: http://cafepress.com/NO_ObamaBiden08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies]

To: LibLieSlayer; Smogger
You were saying ...

SCREW apple, jobs and that evil bunch of granola munching commies.

Well, that may be your sentiments regarding Apple and their products and/or anything associated with them -- but this is a case that has to do with a violation of California law. It would be the same thing going on if it were a different item -- if the police and authorities were aware of it by some other means.

The thing here is the the criminal (one of them, the writer) -- actually wrote about his crime.

And it happens every time -- that a criminal gets caught by his own bragging. If he had not written about his crime... he would have never been caught...

That's why I advise "stupid criminals" -- that if you're going to commit some kind of crime -- don't write a big article about it and publish it -- or don't get on TV and broadcast to the world about the crime you just committed ... LOL ...

That's a stupid criminal for you... :-)

158 posted on 04/27/2010 2:57:35 PM PDT by Star Traveler (Remember to keep the Messiah of Israel in the One-World Government that we look forward to coming)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: 1rudeboy; Smogger
You were saying ...

and possibly tip off the suspect into destroying evidence of a crime.

Yeah... that's hilarious... LOL ...

Some people expect the police, when having a warrant to get those relevant items from some criminal -- that they're supposed to observe some kind of "business hours" and ring the doorbell and come back if no one is home ... doncha know ... :-)

159 posted on 04/27/2010 2:59:39 PM PDT by Star Traveler (Remember to keep the Messiah of Israel in the One-World Government that we look forward to coming)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah

I’m not familiar with the colloquial phrase you used at the very end of your post. Can you elaborate? Feel free to use FReepmail if you need to in order to avoid getting banned! ;)


160 posted on 04/27/2010 3:01:19 PM PDT by LibertyRocks (http://libertyrocks.wordpress.com ~ Anti-Obama Gear: http://cafepress.com/NO_ObamaBiden08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 155 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180 ... 221 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson