Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Did Hawaii have any records on Obama before 2006?
post & email ^ | April 8, 2010 | Sharon Rondeau

Posted on 04/09/2010 10:11:55 AM PDT by Red Steel

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 181-192 next last
To: jcsjcm

This sure is an interesting thread. Just wow....


101 posted on 04/09/2010 4:12:43 PM PDT by jersey117
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: butterdezillion

Ah, VDR means vital delayed birth records. I had originally thought it was vital death records and couldn’t figure out why you were needing those.

Ok, it depends what you want. But, yeah, the VCR-3b is the only one that isn’t microfilmed or dated to destroy.


102 posted on 04/09/2010 4:17:59 PM PDT by bgill (The framers of the US Constitution established an entire federal government in 18 pages.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: bgill

I think VDR might be Vital Delayed Records.

Hawaii only wants the public to see sanitized computer print-outs. And you have to wait at least 10 business days to get even a copy of that. More if they tell you they don’t understand what you’re asking for. Sigh.


103 posted on 04/09/2010 4:20:03 PM PDT by butterdezillion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: mojitojoe

Funny you should mention that...

We’re getting there.

Is anybody here able to get into the archives of the PriusChat Forums?


104 posted on 04/09/2010 4:30:31 PM PDT by butterdezillion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: Fred Nerks

You’re taking TD’s word for it
I don’t doubt the announcement exists on microfilm or microfiche. However, a couple of actual newspapers from the same date as the microfilm, papers that have been authenticated by more than one expert and that DO not show the O announcement but instead show something else, would be pretty damning, no? ;)


105 posted on 04/09/2010 4:33:06 PM PDT by mojitojoe (I don't care what you passed. you are irrelevant. I'll NEVER comply in any way. Read my lips, NEVER!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: mojitojoe

There are no paper copies anywhere, unless somebody saved it in their personal memorabilia.

But that doesn’t mean there’s no evidence of foul play.


106 posted on 04/09/2010 4:36:17 PM PDT by butterdezillion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]

To: bgill

At this point in time, I would not trust that microfilm any more than I’d trust the microfilmed newspaper announcements.
______________
You’re one of the smart ones.


107 posted on 04/09/2010 4:40:05 PM PDT by mojitojoe (I don't care what you passed. you are irrelevant. I'll NEVER comply in any way. Read my lips, NEVER!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: bgill

So do you think we should ask for VCR-3b?

How would that likely be organized? By year? Or just one big chronological list?


108 posted on 04/09/2010 4:40:39 PM PDT by butterdezillion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]

To: mojitojoe

Right.

There may be information they didn’t know they had to sanitize though. There are usually several angles of cross-examination that can be done.


109 posted on 04/09/2010 4:42:05 PM PDT by butterdezillion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies]

To: Fred Nerks

The result would be that Sr. is NOT the father and the maternity could also be in question. I have several theories based on the evidence. Some sound like tin foil hat stuff but actually the facts support them better than the story they want us to believe.


110 posted on 04/09/2010 4:47:20 PM PDT by mojitojoe (I don't care what you passed. you are irrelevant. I'll NEVER comply in any way. Read my lips, NEVER!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies]

To: mojitojoe

I’m not taking anyone’s word for anything, I only posted what was written on Atlas Shrugs and TexasDarlin at the time.

It’s simply for the record.

There appears to be some misunderstanding of how birth announcements appeared in 1961. The myth is, they were generated by information from Vital Records.

I, and several other freepers have often suggested that birth announcements are the result of personal. i.e., insertions made and paid for by relatives.


111 posted on 04/09/2010 4:47:58 PM PDT by Fred Nerks (fair dinkum!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]

To: butterdezillion

There are no paper copies anywhere
____________
BINGO! Some people save papers. Thank goodness.


112 posted on 04/09/2010 4:48:27 PM PDT by mojitojoe (I don't care what you passed. you are irrelevant. I'll NEVER comply in any way. Read my lips, NEVER!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]

To: butterdezillion
There may be information they didn’t know they had to sanitize though.

I'm hoping this is their undoing---failing to catch something that wasn't scrubbed or falsified.

113 posted on 04/09/2010 4:51:07 PM PDT by Faith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies]

To: Fred Nerks

I know, and I believe they were inserted by relatives as well. It really doesn’t matter if actual, saved, personal copies of the newspapers from that month(including that day) differ from the microfilm/microfiche, now does it?
What that would prove is that there was a concentrated effort by public officials to commit fraud upon the people of the United States of America. They need to build some more Federal prisons. I have a feeling within the next 2 years they are going to need them for these rat bastards.


114 posted on 04/09/2010 4:52:35 PM PDT by mojitojoe (I don't care what you passed. you are irrelevant. I'll NEVER comply in any way. Read my lips, NEVER!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies]

To: Faith

If you are searching, you should always do a couple of things. PLEASE do not post a link, photo etc. on FR or elsewhere until you have done a screenshot of everything. Also if you think it is really relevant, don’t post it anywhere on the internet. Get it to the relevant people that are working behind the scenes.


115 posted on 04/09/2010 4:54:48 PM PDT by mojitojoe (I don't care what you passed. you are irrelevant. I'll NEVER comply in any way. Read my lips, NEVER!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies]

To: mojitojoe

Good advice. Thanks.


116 posted on 04/09/2010 4:56:29 PM PDT by Faith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies]

To: mojitojoe
...Some sound like tin foil hat stuff but actually the facts support them better than the story they want us to believe.

Shake off what 'they' want you to believe, and what remains is not tinfoil. For example, study this website and the video's carefully:

VIDEO LINK

Although it attempts to make the case that Stanley Ann Dunham graduated from Mercer Island in 1960, it doesn't succeed, they turn the pages of what they want us to believe is the 1960 yearbook, but no where can I see an image of Stanley Ann Dunham.

If she WAS there in 1960, why not show us?

117 posted on 04/09/2010 5:01:53 PM PDT by Fred Nerks (fair dinkum!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]

To: mojitojoe

I can tell you with certainty that there was a concentrated effort by public officials and media members to commit fraud.

We’ve seen it regarding the COLB and the illegal hiding of the public records (including administrative rules) which would have prevented the fraud before America elected an ineligible president. The COLB was Obama’s first “tower” of manufactured evidence; its fraudulence has been documented.

His other “tower” of evidence was the birth announcements. That will soon fall as well, and the deception and fraud by people we were all told we should trust will be apparent.


118 posted on 04/09/2010 5:19:27 PM PDT by butterdezillion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies]

To: mojitojoe
Has anyone contacted other parents whose babies had birth announcements the same day? They would most likely have souvenir papers.
119 posted on 04/09/2010 5:20:03 PM PDT by LA Woman3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies]

To: edge919

thanks for the clarification.
and THANK Goodness for people like you willing to research and to call all their lies .

Please tell me you think we will actually get to some of the truth surrounding this POS?


120 posted on 04/09/2010 5:37:49 PM PDT by RWGinger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 181-192 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson