White House Misses Deadline on GOP Inquiry About Sestak Scandal, Call for Special Prosecutor Likely

CNSNews.com ^ | April 06, 2010 | Fred Lucas

[NFHale]

“...hard for me to believe someone that held the rank of Admiral would tell a bald faced lie...”

Why not? Just because he was an Admiral? He’s a diehard democrat first and foremost. It’s a way of life for them - Party before country. Whenever his lips are moving, you can bet half of it is B.S.

If they had ever been honest about what they really wanted (a socialist/communist society), we wouldn’t be in the situation we’re in now.

He clearly has no honor. If he did, he wouldn’t be a Dem.

[merry10]

Does that mean you believe the Obama administration?

[NFHale]

Nope.

They’re all dirtbags. Whatever reduces them in any capacity makes me very happy.

My comment was directed to the statement expressing doubt that because someone was once an Admiral, he wouldn’t lie.

People will lie when their butts are on the line. Doesn’t matter WHAT he/she was or did.

[Brad from Tennessee]

[“Having been asked a question that no one had ever asked me before, I answered it honestly,” Sestak told the Allentown (Pa.) Morning Call last week, “The politics of what happens after, I'm not interested in. There are other things we have to focus on.”]

Sestak is saying he will tell the whole sordid tale if put under oath.

[Cosmo]

Wesley Clarke comes to mind

[prairiebreeze]

Sestak should remember the definition of Arkancide. Maybe now it’s more aptly termed Kenyacide.

[Brad from Tennessee]

There's no doubt Sestak will require extra security if he's called before a grand jury. These special prosecutors often uncover many crimes and intrigues beyond their primary target. The White House is a can of worms that needs opening.

[nolongerademocrat]

I’m thinking we don’t need the MSM anymore.